<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Friday 26 July 2013 10:04 AM,
parminder wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:51F1FC73.4010709@itforchange.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Friday 26 July 2013 09:16 AM,
Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:51F1F10A.7020703@ciroap.org" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/07/13 11:31, Ang Peng Hwa
(Prof) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CB3ABCBF601D514CBC6CD9BCC99EC1F41C77693F0E@EXCHANGE31.staff.main.ntu.edu.sg"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#0F243E;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#0F243E">According
to third party sources I asked, ie not the Indonesians,
one major item that added to the cost is that the UN had
apparently asked for US$900k to fly personnel and security
equipment for the event. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Time to cut the UN apron strings.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Why sure, we can check with Google. They will be quite happy to
run the global internet policy dialogue.... It is most astounding
that after subverting and ditching the tradition of strictly
public funding for policy spaces and activities,....</blockquote>
<br>
The game has in fact begun.......Google has already offered 20k.....
now we can wait for Facebook, Microsoft and AT&T to come in
too.. Inter alia it can be very useful to wash, or rather 'persuade'
people to gloss over, their sins that we know from Snowden
disclosures...<br>
<br>
Next, the Indian parliament will fall short on budget and google
with bankroll it too (dont consider it too far fetched, the ideology
is fast catching) .... Do know the future that so many of us seem to
so enthusiastically be rooting for....<br>
<br>
And all this (public fund shortfalls) of course happens becuase in
the first place google et al do not pay their taxes.... What a good
use of the money saved in this way to bankroll policy spaces.... you
can try and steer the debates away from any possible tax avoidance
discussions, or from a discussion on the role of global Internet
companies in using personal data for various kinds of control,
political as well as economic...<br>
<br>
ICANN had more than 50 million US dollars in cash reserve, coming
from the Internet tax they collect from Internet users. This
inflow/reserve is expected to balloon with the new gtld program.. It
is this money that should be employed for funding the global IG
policy dialogue, ie is the IGF.... Rather than just using it to
build and cultivate a community of rather fanatic supporters of
ICANN...<br>
<br>
Such a proposal for using ICANN collected funds to support the IGF
was put forward in the WG on IGF Improvements by my organisation as
well as by India, and supported by developing countries. Why did
other non gov stakeholders (including civil society) and developed
countries oppose this proposal.... Can at least the civil society
members of that group who are on this list explain.... I can see why
private sector or corporate funded technical community did not want
it... can also see the agenda of US supporting developed country
constituency.... but why did civil society oppose it... If the IGF
is really their most loved child...<br>
<br>
All of them opposed UN funding for the IGF (which they will pass off
as likely to increase US control - never mind corporate control)....
but can they explain why they opposed 'committed' funding from ICANN
collected Internet taxes, say of 2 million every year... Isnt that
the right model of funding the IGF , keeping if safe from staist as
well corporate controls....<br>
<br>
To avoid such obvious models of 'public' funding for the IGF seems
to me almost a certainly deliberate strategy to ensure corporatist
control over the IGF... I am happy to hear argument against this
proposition. <br>
<br>
Can we have a discussion on this here - the appropriate model for
funding the IGF... Can various actors present their arguments for
and against the model I propose....<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:51F1FC73.4010709@itforchange.net" type="cite">and
adopting the neoliberal and anti-democratic (and fancy)
multistakeholder funding model, now that it has collapsed one is
to blame the public systems for it.... <br>
<br>
To repeat: this disaster occurred precisely because of cutting of
the apron strings that policy space should always have tied to
public funds and public systems. When Indonesian government said
last year that it was unable to fund the IGF, it should not have
been handed over to a private committee headed by a businessman.
... It should have been shifted to another country willing to host
it.... We are participating in an absolute privatisation of
governance and politics, and simply following the neolib agenda
that represents the interests of the most powerful...<br>
<br>
And this is indeed sheer 'power' - that those who are responsible
for a 'failure' can so conveniently blame others for it, and
employ their own failure to further their cause....<br>
<br>
And why should this be seen as a 'failure'. See it as an
opportunity to completely do away with pulbic funded and pulbic
systems supported public spaces... Lets go over completely to
corporate funded policy spaces and policy making.... Why make
these moves in such shifty cautious ways. So at least we will all
know what is that we are contributing to building - what kind of
society...<br>
<br>
(By the way, right now we have a full fledged experiment of this
kind - corporate run policy spaces - running in India, it shows
the pattern and the larger design of certain ideologies and
forces, and the extent to which they have been successful.)<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
(PS: This is a general response, not just to your email, Jeremy.
And please do excuse my cynical language. These anti-democratic
shifts are really disturbing.)<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:51F1F10A.7020703@ciroap.org" type="cite"> <br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<p style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black"><b>Dr Jeremy Malcolm<br>
Senior Policy Officer<br>
Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for
consumers</b><br>
Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East<br>
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia<br>
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599</p>
<!--<p style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black"><b>Your rights, our mission – download CI's Strategy 2015:</b> <a href="http://consint.info/RightsMission">http://consint.info/RightsMission</a></p>-->
<p style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black">Explore our new
Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge hub |
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone">http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone</a></p>
<p style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black">@Consumers_Int | <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.consumersinternational.org">www.consumersinternational.org</a>
| <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational">www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a></p>
<p style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#999999">Read our <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality"
target="_blank">email confidentiality notice</a>. Don't
print this email unless necessary.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>