<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Adam,<br>
      <br>
      It certainly does cover my concerns. I would quote to you the
      relevant passages but that would mean pratically quoting half of
      the formal objection. For example:<br>
      <br>
      "The inclusion of this deliverable, and any deliverable where
      ultimate control over user agent functionality is technically and
      legally removed from the user, will (1) exclude an entire class of
      platforms and user agents from full conformance with the HTML5
      standard and the W3C's vision of the Open Web; (2) encourage the
      reduction of the amount of content accessible to users via the
      Web; and (3) create serious future impediments to W3C's core
      mission of promoting interoperability, voluntary standards
      compliance, and access for all." - 2nd para<br>
      <br>
      "[...] We hope we can bring our experience working with standards
      groups, researchers, legislators, and users to help illuminate
      best practices for conveniently providing support for commercial
      content while still preserving user rights." - 3rd para<br>
      <br>
      "Engineering usage control on modern devices requires both
      preventing the user from controlling some of the functionality of
      her own device, and giving control over that functionality to a
      third party. Many developers view this as both technically
      problematic (users should normally have full access to the
      hardware and software of their own devices), and damaging to user
      security (with remote usage control, third parties may extract,
      delete or tamper data on the user's computer without permission;
      see, e.g. the Sony Rootkit scandal). Usage controls also provide
      an disturbing set of incentives to withhold the highest level of
      administrative control over a device from its owner, forcing
      individuals to cede power over their devices to others and eroding
      the meaning and scope of ownership." - 9th para<br>
      <br>
      Etc., etc.<br>
      <br>
      For more examples, please read :
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg">https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg</a><br>
      <br>
      Hope this helps,<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Catherine<br>
      <br>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Catherine Roy
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.catherine-roy.net">http://www.catherine-roy.net</a></pre>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 07/06/2013 1:54 AM, Adam Peake wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:0BB11D99-2C33-477D-B892-73F254344143@glocom.ac.jp"
      type="cite">Hi Catherine,
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Does the EFF statement cover your concerns?  </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Best,</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Adam</div>
      <div><br>
        <div><br>
          <div>
            <div>On Jun 7, 2013, at 2:14 AM, Catherine Roy wrote:</div>
            <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
                http-equiv="Content-Type">
              <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi,<br>
                  <br>
                  While I support this latest formulation by Adam as it
                  is simple, to the point and avoids ambiguous and
                  perhaps (for the moment) unprovable facts, I feel it
                  is lacking with regards to users' rights, which is
                  also one of the key issues at the heart of this whole
                  matter. That is, as someone on the W3C restricted
                  media mailing list mentioned, standards should be at
                  the margin of debates, and if required to take part,
                  should always, in the end, be on the side of the user.
                  Much like optimizing sites for particular browsers
                  that shut out certain users, there is a real problem
                  here with shutting out users who do  not have the
                  right software/hardware from content (in this case,
                  much of the discussions revolve around premium
                  content  but it could extend to any content that
                  applies DRM). So, while I am not a wordsmith and
                  therefore apologize for not proposing exact wording, I
                  would like to see something more clear in the
                  statement regarding users rights and sovereignty over
                  their euh, "equipment".<br>
                  <br>
                  Best regards,<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Catherine<br>
                  <br>
                  <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Catherine Roy
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.catherine-roy.net/">http://www.catherine-roy.net</a></pre>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  On 2013-06-06 04:52, Adam Peake wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote
                  cite="mid:EAAB21E8-1E80-44BE-90A4-C1282298636C@glocom.ac.jp"
                  type="cite">
                  <div>
                    <div>Hi Sala, </div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>To be honest, having to remember a url and jump
                      off to a separate site for such a small statement
                      is a pain.  In my opinion, anyway.  Perhaps you
                      can see the stats on the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a> page,

                      how many people bother to visit vs the very large
                      number who read the list?</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>A cleaned up version of a short statement:</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>The Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus
                      (IGC) endorses and supports the formal objection
                      lodged by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
                      <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg">https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg</a>></div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>We believe that the inclusion of digital rights
                      management in HTML5 has the potential to stifle
                      innovation and we object to the inclusion of
                      digital rights management (DRM) in HTML5.</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>We fully endorse the arguments raised by the
                      EFF in their statement "EFF's Formal Objection to
                      the HTML WG Draft Charter" <<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg">https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg</a>></div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>The EFF statement we're considering to support
                      is itself long and speaks for itself.  See no need
                      to add more than above.</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Adam</div>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>On Jun 6, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Salanieta T.
                    Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:</div>
                  <div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                    <blockquote type="cite">In case, people missed it.
                      The revised Statement is live at:<br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.igcaucus.org/digressit/archives/112"
                        target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/digressit/archives/112</a>
                      where you can add your comments and suggest text.<br>
                      <br>
                      Kind Regards,<br>
                      Sala<br>
                      <br>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at
                        2:50 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <span
                          dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a>></span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
                          0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                          solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear All,<br>
                          <br>
                          Further to the discussions on the mailing
                          list, I have revised the first version to the
                          one below. I have highlighted the sentence
                          still in contention and also note that there
                          are mixed reactions to the balance of the
                          protection of intellectual property rights
                          through mediums like the DRM to protect
                          innovation and challenges to threats of
                          impeded "Access". This is a very interesting
                          debate and one I believe should be thoroughly
                          explored by the IGC where we can come to some
                          common ground (if we are able to). I have not
                          had the time to read Frank La Rue's new report
                          but it would be interesting to see his report
                          of what the world is saying in relation to
                          this conflict. I am of course interested in
                          what the IGC has to say.<br>
                          <br>
                          Roland and Avri raised some very interesting
                          points that deserve discussion. As we speak,
                          the Statement will be hosted on the Statement
                          Workspace on the IGC website. I have tried to
                          capture every comment in the attached
                          document. I find that Statement Workspaces are
                          far more effective in neatly allowing people
                          to comment on each sentence etc, so my
                          apologies if the attached document is
                          inherently messy.<br>
                          <br>
                          What are your collective thoughts on what
                          Roland suggested that whilst there are many
                          battles, this is not one we should spend time
                          on? The key issues for your deliberation would
                          be:-<br>
                          <ul>
                            <li>What is the IGC's position on Digital
                              Rights Management?</li>
                            <li>What is the IGC's position on Digital
                              Rights Management in HTML 5?</li>
                          </ul>
                          <p>Thank you to all those for suggesting text
                            and new wordings and phrases. I have tried
                            to capture your views below. All the
                            mistakes are of course mine. Let us have
                            your thoughts. As soon as the Statement is
                            on the Workspace, Norbert will inform us and
                            this will allow us to track comments on the
                            revised  statement.<br>
                          </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"
                            style="text-align:justify"><b><u><span
                                  style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Revised

                                  Draft Statement on Support for EFF’s
                                  Objection</span></u></b></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"
                            style="text-align:justify"><span
                              style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">The
Civil

                              Society Internet Governance Caucus (IGC)
                              objects to the inclusion of digital rights
                              management (DRM) in HTML5. We endorse and
                              support the formal objection lodged by the
                              Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and
                              that the draft proposal from the World
                              Wide Web Consortium (W3C) could stifle Web
                              innovation and block access to content for
                              people across the planet.</span></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"
                            style="text-align:justify"><span
                              style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><br>
                            </span></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"
                            style="text-align:justify"><span
                              style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">We
believe

                              that the proposed standard by W3C is a
                              serious threat to an open and free
                              internet. <span style="background:yellow">The

                                inherent danger of the proposal would be
                                to shut out open source developers and
                                competition, destroy interoperability
                                and lock in legacy business models.</span></span></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"
                            style="text-align:justify"><span
                              style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><span
                                style="background:yellow"><br>
                              </span></span></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"
                            style="margin-top:0in;text-align:justify"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Much
                              of the developing world relies on open
                              source developers to enable OR
                              CREATE mechanisms that allow for an open
                              environment of sharing resources related
                              to agricultural practices, education,
                              health and diverse content. In such
                              regions, access to information is a
                              challenge and with serious resource
                              constraints, but it is an open and free
                              internet (and the resultant ease of
                              collaboration/sharing information) that
                              empowers communities.</span></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"
                            style="text-align:justify"><span
                              style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">For
the

                              foregoing reasons we reiterate our strong
                              objection to the support for DRM
                              technologies in HTML5, and our agreement
                              with the EFF's arguments in this regard.</span></p>
                          <br>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <br clear="all">
                      <br>
                      -- <br>
                      <div>Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala</div>
                      <div>P.O. Box 17862</div>
                      <div>Suva</div>
                      <div>Fiji</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>Twitter: @SalanietaT</div>
                      <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro">Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro</a></div>
                      <div>Tel: +679 3544828</div>
                      <div>Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851</div>
                      <div>Blog: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://salanieta.blogspot.com/"
                          target="_blank">salanieta.blogspot.com</a><br>
                      </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font color="#222222" face="arial,
                          sans-serif"><span style="line-height:16px"><br>
                          </span></font></div>
____________________________________________________________<br>
                      You received this message as a subscriber on the
                      list:<br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
                      To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
                      <br>
                      For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
                      To edit your profile and to find the IGC's
                      charter, see:<br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
                      <br>
                      Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
              </div>
____________________________________________________________<br>
              You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
              To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
              <br>
              For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
              To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
              <br>
              Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>