<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
[Only question is does the FBI have jurisdiction over ICANN, etc...
it seems like waging an illegal war (after 'collateral damage'
killed half a million Iraqi children!) is OK, but simply mobilising
peacefully against it is a problem... what use rights if they are
not there when Americans specifically need them? At least ACLU and
other institutions safeguard the constitution as best they can... ]<br>
<h1 class="entry-title">Anti-War News Site Sues FBI For Spying On –
and Targeting – It for Political Reasons</h1>
<div class="entry-meta"> <span class="meta-prep meta-prep-author">Posted
on</span> <a
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/05/anti-war-site-sues-fbi-for-spying-and-targeting-it-without-cause.html"
title="4:12 am" rel="bookmark"><span class="entry-date">May 22,
2013</span></a> <span class="meta-sep">by</span> <span
class="author vcard"><a class="url fn n"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/author/washingtonsblog"
title="View all posts by WashingtonsBlog">WashingtonsBlog</a></span>
</div>
<h3 style="color: #000099;">Antiwar v. FBI</h3>
<p>We’ve pointed out that there’s a much <a title="Permalink to The
Bigger Story Behind the AP Spying Scandal"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/05/the-bigger-story-behind-the-ap-spying-scandal.html"
rel="bookmark">bigger story behind the AP and Fox spying scandal</a>.</p>
<p>As we’ve reported for years, the government treats folks who
speak out against war as <a title="potential terrorists"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">potential
terrorists</a>.</p>
<p>We <a title="noted"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">noted</a>
in 2011:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Anti-war websites like AntiWar.com are <a title="listed on
various terrorist watchlists"
href="http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/08/21/antiwar-com-vs-the-fbi/"
target="_blank">listed on various terrorist watchlists</a>:
see <a title="number 16 here"
href="http://wearechangeoklahoma.org/images/Extremisim.jpg"
target="_blank">number 16 here</a>, and <a title="number 37
here"
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20020916055305/http://www.adl.org/mwd/m1.asp"
target="_blank">number 37 here</a>.</p>
<p>AntiWar’s sin? It is (according to the watchlists):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>An unusual site, essentially an isolationist
right-wing/libertarian site consciously designed to appeal to
anti-war activists from the left as well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The <a title="irony, of course"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/a-majority-of-americans-including-both-ows-and-the-tea-party-agree-on-the-most-important-issues-we-just-dont-realize-it.html">irony,
of course</a>, is [that] Americans want to <a title="put a
stop to perpetual warfare:"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/09/polls-americans-want-our-liberties-restored-our-troops-brought-home-and-the-federal-reserve-reined-in.html">put
a stop to perpetual warfare …</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Today, Antiwar.com – with the help of the ACLU – <a
target="_blank" title="filed suit"
href="http://original.antiwar.com/vlahos/2013/05/21/antiwar-com-sues-fbi-after-secret-surveillance/">filed
suit</a> against the FBI:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Antiwar.com is taking the FBI to court.</p>
<p>The website’s founder and managing editor Eric Garris, along
with longtime editorial director Justin Raimondo, filed a
lawsuit in federal court today, demanding the release of records
they believe the FBI is keeping on them and the 17-year-old
online magazine.</p>
<p>Antiwar.com says this is one more example of post-9/11
government overreach, and a stark reminder that the First
Amendment has been treated as little more than a speed bump on
the road to a government surveillance state. The lawsuit is
particularly timely, considering recent scandals in which the
Department of Justice <a target="_blank" title="secretly seized
months of journalists’ phone records"
href="http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/05/14/doj-snooping-on-journalists-a-witch-hunt-to-enforce-obama-demand-for-total-secrecy/">secretly
seized months of journalists’ phone records</a> at the
Associated Press, and did the same and more <a target="_blank"
title="to a FOX News reporter"
href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-rare-peek-into-a-justice-department-leak-probe/2013/05/19/0bc473de-be5e-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_print.html">to
a FOX News reporter</a>, while the <a target="_blank"
title="IRS is acknowledging it singled out conservative
groups"
href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/12/irs-targeted-groups-that-criticized-the-government-ig-report-says/">IRS
is acknowledging it singled out conservative groups</a> that
criticize the government for extra scrutiny.</p>
<p>Suddenly, the press is <a target="_blank" title="more aware
than ever"
href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/05/associated-press-phone-records-spying-journalists">more
aware than ever</a> that the state has the ability to secretly
monitor its activities, heretofore thought of as
constitutionally protected from government interference and
intimidation.</p>
<p>“<strong>Freedom of the press is a cornerstone of our
democracy, whether it’s AP or Antiwar.com</strong>,” said
Julia Harumi Mass, staff attorney for the <strong>American
Civil Liberties Union</strong> of Northern California, which
is representing Antiwar.com in the case. “<strong>FBI
surveillance of news organizations interferes with
journalists’ ability to do their jobs as watchdogs that hold
the government accountable</strong>.”</p>
<p>The suit was filed on Tuesday at the United States District
Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.
Both Garris and Raimondo live and work in the San Francisco Bay
area.</p>
<p>According to the suit, the ACLU has made several futile
attempts to obtain the FBI files since a reader alerted Garris
and Raimondo to <a target="_blank" title="this lengthy FBI
memo"
href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/62394765/Related-article-at-http-tinyurl-com-FBI-Dancing-Israelis-Dancing-Israelis-FBI-document-Section-6-1138796-001-303A-NK-105536-Section-6">this
lengthy FBI memo</a> in 2011. The details in question begin at
page 62 of the heavily redacted 94-page document. It’s clear
from these documents, the suit alleges, that the FBI has files
on Garris and Raimondo, and at one point the FBI agent writing
the April 30, 2004 memo on Antiwar.com recommends further
monitoring of the website in the form of opening a “preliminary
investigation …to determine if [redaction] are engaging in, or
have engaged in, activities which constitute a threat to
national security.”</p>
<p>“On one hand <strong>it seemed almost funny that we would be
considered a threat to national security, but it’s very scary,
because what we are engaging in is free speech, and free
speech by ordinary citizens and journalists is now being
considered a threat to national security and they don’t have
to prove it because the government has the ability to suppress
information and not disclose any of their activities</strong>
– as witnessed with what is going on now at the AP and other
things,” said Garris.</p>
<p>“<strong>The government’s attitude is they want to know all,
but they want the public to know as little as possible</strong>.”</p>
<p><strong>In response, the ACLU began filing requests in December
2011 under the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) for any records the FBI was currently holding on
Antiwar.com</strong>, <a target="_blank" title="which
describes itself" href="http://www.antiwar.com/who.php">which
describes itself</a> as a Libertarian-inspired project of the
Randolph Bourne Institute. It was clear from reading the memo
that Antiwar.com came under the radar in part for its mission,
which is characterized as publishing a <strong>non-interventionist</strong>
“online magazine and research tool designed to keep the American
people and the world informed about the overseas plans of the
American government.” [Full disclosure, this writer is a regular
contributor].</p>
<blockquote>
<p>While openly acknowledging that we have an agenda, the
editors take seriously our purely journalistic mission, which
is to get past the media filters and reveal the truth about
America’s foreign policy. Citing a wide variety of sources
without fear or favor, and presenting our own views in the
regular columns of various contributors, we clearly
differentiate between fact and opinion, and let our readers
know which is which.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The website was also targeted, according to the FBI memo, for
links it published to counter-terrorism watch lists (which were
already in the public domain), and for the people who were
visiting Antiwar.com and/or talking it up at rallies. The FBI
noted at least two of Raimondo’s columns and wondered openly,
“who are (Antiwar.com’s) contributors and what are the funds
utilized for?” This, after acknowledging there was <strong>no
evidence of any crime being plotted or committed</strong>.</p>
<p>“<strong>This illustrates the troubling, continuing efforts of
the federal government to monitor protected speech activity
without evidence or even allegation of criminal activity</strong>,”
said Mass, who explained that there are specific prohibitions
against such surveillance and record-keeping in the <a
target="_blank" title="1974 Privacy Act [5 U.S.C 552a(e)(7)]"
href="https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/filenode/FBI_guidelines/domestic_investigations_and_operations_guide_part5.pdf">1974
Privacy Act [5 U.S.C 552a(e)(7)]</a>.</p>
<p>After Raimondo <a target="_blank" title="wrote about the FBI
memo in August 2011"
href="http://www.emptywheel.net/2011/08/22/fbi-conducts-threat-assessment-on-antiwar-com-journalists-for-linking-to-publicly-available-document/">wrote
about the FBI memo in August 2011</a>, which at the time,
independent journalist Marcy Wheeler at EmptyWheel.net deemed <a
target="_blank" title="a “troubling story,”"
href="http://www.emptywheel.net/2011/08/22/fbi-conducts-threat-assessment-on-antiwar-com-journalists-for-linking-to-publicly-available-document/">a
“troubling story,”</a> Antiwar.com started losing donors, and
according to the lawsuit, it was big time.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In October 2011, <strong>one of Antiwar.com’s major donors
withdrew his financial support from Antiwar.com out of
concern that the FBI would monitor him</strong> if he
continued to provide, as he wished to do, financial support to
Antiwar.com. Since then, three significant donors have also
withdrawn financial support, citing their fear that FBI
interest in Antiwar.com would lead to surveillance of the
donors as a reason for withdrawing financial support. As a
result, Antiwar.com has lost about $75,000 per year since 2011
in otherwise expected contributions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Reached over the weekend, Wheeler, who routinely investigates
and reports on the impact of post-9/11 government surveillance
on civil liberties for <a target="_blank"
title="EmptyWheel.net" href="http://www.emptywheel.net">EmptyWheel.net</a>,
voiced her concern about the apparent FBI surveillance of
Antiwar.com and its far-reaching implications.</p>
<p>“It’s likely (the) FBI is hiding one or another things: Bush
era <strong>investigations into the peace community</strong>
that were improper to start with, and/or the degree to which
First Amendment activities have become one reason to investigate
completely innocent activity,” she said.</p>
<p>After a series of FOIA requests, amended requests and empty
responses, Garris and Raimondo have “received no agency
determination setting forth whether Defendant FBI intends to
produce records or any basis for withholding them,” since the
last request dated May 24, 2012. Taking it to court, Mass said,
is the next step.</p>
<p>“Our clients are entitled to obtain records the FBI has
gathered about them and their online magazine,” she said. “This
is especially important because the FBI’s surveillance has
impacted our clients’ ability to maintain support for their
website and has impacted their editorial choices– exactly the
type of harm the First Amendment is supposed to protect
against.”</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>[One of the reasons that the FBI was investigating the
non-interventionist website is because] an article that listed
Antiwar.com as a reference was handed out in 2002 at a “peaceful
protest” at a British air base in the U.K.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>“There are several unanswered questions regarding <a
target="_blank" title="www.antiwar.com,”"
class="smarterwiki-linkify"
href="http://www.antiwar.com,%E2%80%9D">www.antiwar.com,”</a>
reads the FBI memo. “It describes itself as a non-profit group
that survives on generous contributions from its readers. Who
are these contributors and what are the funds used for?”</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>The unidentified agent writing the memo concludes, “it is
recommended that ECAU (Electronic Communications Analysis Unit)
further monitor the postings on the website … it is recommended
that a PI (preliminary investigation) is opened to determine if
[line redacted] have engaged in, or are engaging in, activities
which constitute a threat to national security on behalf of a
foreign power.”</p>
<p>This is the decisive point of the memo as it pertains to
Antiwar.com: that Garris and Raimondo and Antiwar.com, for
writing about a particularly sensitive subject and for linking
to information that is already circulating around the Internet,
may be a “threat to national security on behalf of a foreign
power,” and therefore subject to secret surveillance. <strong>That
would make any journalist, who say, linked a story to
documents published by Wikileaks, <a target="_blank"
title="which is currently under federal investigation"
href="http://leaksource.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/department-of-justice-spokesman-for-eastern-district-of-virginia-confirms-grand-jury-investigation-into-wikileaks-ongoing/">which
is currently under federal investigation</a>, suspect too,
surmised the plaintiffs</strong>.</p>
<p>“<strong>This sort of government activity is so chilling
because it puts the fear of government at a higher level, and
among the news media</strong>,” said Garris, noting the
negative effect that federal leak investigations are already
having on the free press. “<strong>Once the people aren’t able
to get information, the government can, potentially, have
unlimited power</strong>.”</p>
<p>According to Mass, the ACLU is filing a separate,
administrative request to the FBI to find and further expunge
any files it may have on Garris and Raimondo.</p>
<p>“The government,” concluded Mass, “cannot keep records about
people’s exercise of free speech unless it is related to a
criminal investigation.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The government is <a title="spying"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/americans-the-most-spied-on-people-in-world-history.html">spying</a>
<a title="on"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/top-nsa-spying-chief-if-you-ever-get-on-their-enemies-list-like-petraeus-did-then-you-can-be-drawn-into-that-surveillance.html">on</a>
<a title="every"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/03/all-u-s-intelligence-agencies-including-cia-and-nsa-to-spy-on-americans-finances.html">every</a>
<a title="American"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/05/irs-will-spy-on-our-shopping-records-travel-social-interactions-health-records-and-files-from-other-government-investigators.html">American</a>
… and <a title="treating peaceful protesters as potential
terrorists"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/peaceful-protest-treated-as-terrorism-by-the-fbi.html">treating
peaceful protesters as potential terrorists</a>.</p>
<p>As we noted in March, <a title="the Constitution is on the
ropes"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/02/constitution.html">the
Constitution is on the ropes</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The <a title="threat of being labeled a terrorist"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/the-fbi-drowning-in-counter-terrorism-money-power-and-other-resources-will-apply-the-term-terrorism-to-any-group-it-dislikes-and-wants-to-control-and-suppress.html">threat
of being labeled a terrorist for exercising our First
Amendment rights</a> certainly violates the First Amendment.
The government is <a title="using laws to crush dissent"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">using
laws to crush dissent</a>, and it’s gotten so bad that even <a
title="U.S. Supreme Court justices are saying "
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/2-u-s-supreme-court-justices-and-numerous-other-top-government-officials-warn-of-dictatorship.html">U.S.
Supreme Court justices are saying </a>that we are descending
into tyranny.</p>
<p>For example, the following actions may get an American citizen
living on U.S. soil labeled as a “suspected terrorist” today:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Being young"
href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/insider-threat/"
target="_blank">Being young</a> (if you live near a battle
zone, you are <a title="fair game"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/06/u-s-labels-all-young-men-in-battle-zones-as-militants-and-american-soil-is-now-considered-a-battle-zone.html">fair
game</a>; and <a title="see this"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/no-child-left-behind.html">see
this</a>)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Using social media"
href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/insider-threat/"
target="_blank">Using social media</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Reporting or doing journalism"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/in-america-journalists-are-considered-terrorists.html">Reporting
or doing journalism</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Speaking out against government policies"
href="http://www.counterpunch.org/cohn09302006.html"
target="_blank">Speaking out against government policies</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Protesting anything"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">Protesting
anything</a> (such as participating in the <a
title="“Occupy” movement"
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/nyregion/occupy-movement-was-investigated-by-fbi-counterterrorism-agents-records-show.html?_r=0"
target="_blank">“Occupy” movement</a>)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Questioning war"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">Questioning
war</a> (even though <a title="war reduces our national
security"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/four-stories-this-week-prove-that-the-war-on-terror-is-a-farce.html">war
reduces our national security</a>; and see <a title="this"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/nobel-prize-winning-economist-war-is-widely-thought-to-be-linked-to-economic-good-times-nonsense.html">this</a>)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Criticizing the government’s targeting of innocent
civilians with drones"
href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/top_official_drone_critics_are_al_qaeda_enablers/singleton/"
target="_blank">Criticizing the government’s targeting of
innocent civilians with drones</a> (although killing
innocent civilians with drones is one of the main things which
<a title="increases terrorism"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/01/nice-work-creating-new-terrorists-you.html">increases
terrorism</a>. And see <a title="this"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/10/why-were-losing-the-war-on-terror.html">this</a>)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Asking questions about pollution"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">Asking
questions about pollution</a> (even at a <a title="public
Congressional hearing"
href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/02/02/documentary-filmmaker-josh-fox-arrested-at-fracking-hearing"
target="_blank">public Congressional hearing</a>?)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Paying cash at an Internet cafe"
href="http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2012/02/06/fbi-enlists-internet-cafe-owners-to-spy-on-customers-2/"
target="_blank">Paying cash at an Internet cafe</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Asking questions about Wall Street shenanigans"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">Asking
questions about Wall Street shenanigans</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Holding gold"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">Holding
gold</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Creating alternative currencies"
href="http://www.nysun.com/editorials/a-unique-form-of-terrorism/87269/"
target="_blank">Creating alternative currencies</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="stocking up on more than 7 days of food"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXKfEsgLLRU&feature=related"
target="_blank">Stocking up on more than 7 days of food</a>
(even though all <a title="Mormons are taught to stockpile
food"
href="http://jenny-evans.suite101.com/why-do-mormons-store-food-a284336"
target="_blank">Mormons are taught to stockpile food</a>,
and most <a title="Hawaiians store up on extra food"
href="http://whatreallyhappened.com/node/156535"
target="_blank">Hawaiians store up on extra food</a>)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Having bumper stickers saying things like “Know
Your Rights Or Lose Them”"
href="http://www.infowars.com/doj-funded-training-manual-lists-bumper-stickers-as-terrorism/"
target="_blank">Having bumper stickers saying things like
“Know Your Rights Or Lose Them”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="investigates factory farming"
href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/environment/la-me-gs-fbi-tracking-animal-videotapers-as-terrorists-20111229,0,5919114.story"
target="_blank">Investigating factory farming</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Infringing a copyright"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/ter%C2%B7ror%C2%B7ist-noun-anyone-who-disagrees-with-the-government-2.html">Infringing
a copyright</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Taking pictures or videos"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2008/09/in-a-fascist-state-cameras-equal-terrorism.html">Taking
pictures or videos</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Talking to police officers"
href="http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/"
target="_blank">Talking to police officers</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Wearing a hoodie"
href="http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/"
target="_blank">Wearing a hoodie</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Driving a van"
href="http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/"
target="_blank">Driving a van</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Writing on a piece of paper"
href="http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/"
target="_blank">Writing on a piece of paper</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>(<a title="Not having a Facebook account"
href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2184658/Is-joining-Facebook-sign-youre-psychopath-Some-employers-psychologists-say-suspicious.html"
target="_blank">Not having a Facebook account</a> may soon
be added)</li>
</ul>
<p>And holding the following beliefs may also be considered
grounds for suspected terrorism:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Being frustrated with “mainstream ideologies”"
href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/insider-threat/"
target="_blank">Being frustrated with “mainstream
ideologies”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Liking online privacy"
href="http://publicintelligence.net/do-you-like-online-privacy-you-may-be-a-terrorist/"
target="_blank">Valuing online privacy</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Supporting Ron Paul or being a libertarian"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/in-modern-america-liking-peace-is-considered-terrorism.html">Supporting
Ron Paul or being a libertarian</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Liking <a title="the Founding Fathers"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oP1Ke70Mi8"
target="_blank">the Founding Fathers</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Being a <a title="Christian"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oP1Ke70Mi8"
target="_blank">Christian</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Being <a title="anti-tax, anti-regulation or for the gold
standard"
href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/us-usa-fbi-extremists-idUSTRE81600V20120207"
target="_blank">anti-tax, anti-regulation or for the gold
standard</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Being <a title="“reverent of individual liberty”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“reverent
of individual liberty”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Being <a title="“anti-nuclear”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“anti-nuclear”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“Believe in conspiracy theories”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“Believe
in conspiracy theories”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“A belief that one’s personal and/or national “way
of life” is under attack”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“A
belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is
under attack”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“Impose strict religious tenets or laws on society
(fundamentalists)”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“Impose
strict religious tenets or laws on society
(fundamentalists)”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“Insert religion into the political sphere”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“Insert
religion into the political sphere”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“Those who seek to politicize religion”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“Those
who seek to politicize religion”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“Supported political movements for autonomy”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“Supported
political movements for autonomy”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Being <a title="“anti-abortion”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“anti-abortion”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Being <a title="“anti-Catholic”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“anti-Catholic”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Being <a title="“anti-global”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“anti-global”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“Suspicious of centralized federal authority”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“Suspicious
of centralized federal authority”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“Fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal
and international in orientation)”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“Fiercely
nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in
orientation)”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="“A belief in the need to be prepared for an attack
either by participating in … survivalism”"
href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/government-uses-anti-terror-laws-to-crush-dissent-and-help-big-business.html">“A
belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by
participating in … survivalism”</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Opposing genetically engineered food"
href="http://www.infowars.com/doj-funded-training-manual-lists-bumper-stickers-as-terrorism/"
target="_blank">Opposing genetically engineered food</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Opposing surveillance"
href="http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-white-americans-as-most-likely-terrorists/"
target="_blank">Opposing surveillance</a></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>