<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Dear Wolfgang,<div><br></div><div>You may recall that some months ago I mentioned the disconnect between the two 2015 UN reviews: WSIS and the MDGs - and that the disconnect was especially significant because the UN agencies were coordinating but all other stakeholders weren't. </div><div><br></div><div>Behind the scenes I've been talking about this with governments here in Geneva and companies and NGOs too, and there's real interest in seeing how the next 10 years of WSIS can be an opportunity for the Internet community (and ICTs generally) to be a part of the delivery of the SDGs (the likely name of the next 10 years of the MDGs is the Sustainable Development Goals). Debates about governance is all very well - but actually making a difference in the lives of people is preferable for most, I suspect, over political to-ing and fro-ing. </div><div><br></div><div>While a declaration of the kind you mention would IMHO be useful, declarations are just that - statements. There's no substitute for actual engagement:</div><div><br></div><div>1) Get connected to the existing network of NGOs active in MDG followup. You can find the homepage of those NGOs <a href="http://www.beyond2015.org/">here</a>. Needless to say, the community of NGOs working on the MDGs greatly dwarfs that working on Internet policy - but it seems to me that's an opportunity for cross-fertilization: each group would be stronger if some of the others joined it.</div><div><br></div><div>2) The meetings and documents of UNGIS should be open, not closed. If interagency cooperation between the two review processes remains closed, civil society is likely to be the biggest loser. Advocating for this is something I suspect all stakeholder groups would support. </div><div><br></div><div>The MDGs are a head-of-state-level priority. WSIS isn't. The best opportunity to make the next 10 years of WSIS a bigger priority is to ensure it is a part of the next 10 years of the MDGs.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div><div>On 19 May 2013, at 14:18, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <<a href="mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de">wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Hi everybody,<br><br>I want to kick-start a discussion how to prepare for the next phase in the WSIS 10+ process, as it was discussed at length during the recent Geneva meeting.<br><a href="http://www.itu.int/wsis/implementation/2013/forum/documents/outcomes.html">http://www.itu.int/wsis/implementation/2013/forum/documents/outcomes.html</a><br><br>The overall plan - pushed forward by the ITU - is to have a high level (ministerial) meeting in April 2014 in Sharm el Sheikh followed by an another high level event in 2015. The 2015 event has to be decided by the next UN General Assembly in December 2013. One recommendation from Geneva was to link the WSIS 10+ process in a not yet specified way to the UN Milleniums Development Goals Summit which will take place also in 2015. Janis Karklins from UNESCO proposed to do the WSIS 10+ event (WSIS III?) before the Millenium Summit to clear how ICT can help to achieve MDGs. <br><br>Furthermore a discussion has started for the "Beyond 2015 strategy" for the further development of the information society, something like WSIS++. The first push came from UNGIS, a platform of now about 30 intergovernmental organsations. UNGIS presents itself as a more technical (internal) UN body which just facilitates information exchange. However in its joint statement it has already framed how 2015+ should be discussed and it has the potential to become a policy body.<br><br>The process ahaed of us raises numerous issues, both with regard to substance as well as to procedures. And CS should start to form as quick as possible a similar structure which guided CS through the two phases of WSIS between 2002 and 2005 with a Plenary, a Bureau, a Content & Themes Group and various WGs and Caucuses. <br><br>So far the process is driven mainly by the UN organisations with ITU, UNDP and UNESCO in the drivers sead. They "consult" with stakeholders but this consultations does not really look like a full inclusion on equal footing. There is on the one hand a general commitment for multistakeholderism on all levels, on the other hand there are no procedures in place how the MS should be operationalized in the preparation of the events in 2014 and 2015 and in draftting the 2015+ strategy. UNGIS sits in closed meetings. The ministerial meetings are not open to the public. There is no - as we had in WSIS I & II - Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) with interacting buereaus of the three stakeholder groups. <br><br>My expecation is that the UNCSTD will discuss this in its June 2013 meeting and send some recommendations to the UNGA. The 2nd Committee will prepare probably a resolution which include principles and procedures for both the 2014 and 2015 events. <br><br>The 2014 event in Sharm el Sheikh is back-to-back to the ITU World Telecommunication Development Conference (WTDC) which will be prepared by a series of regional development conferences within the coming months. While there is no direct formal link between WTDC and WSIS 10+, one can expect that this process will be steered primarily by the ITU. <br><br>What civil society should do now is to draft a formal statement with the aim to clarify the procedures for the full and equal involvment of CS into the preparatory process for the two events in 2014 and 2015 as well as into the drafting of a 2015+ strategy. This statement should refer also to the CS Declaration from 2003 and reiterate basic CS values as still relevant in 2013++. <br>http://www.itu.int/wsis/documents/doc_multi.asp?lang=en?&id=1179%7C1208<br><br>Wolfgang<br><br><br>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> governance@lists.igcaucus.org<br>To be removed from the list, visit:<br> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing<br><br>For all other list information and functions, see:<br> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance<br>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br> http://www.igcaucus.org/<br><br>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>