<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Nobody stops you or anyone else from discussing these</div><div><br></div><div>Do try to back rhetoric and ideology with facts though.<br><br>--srs (iPad)</div><div><br>On 22-Mar-2013, at 12:39, parminder <<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<font face="Verdana">Beware Riaz, you are stepping into another
prohibited space of "do not discuss"<br>
<br>
Do not discuss "US gov role in ICANN"<br>
<br>
Do not discuss "google, facebook etc"<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana">Do
not discuss "technical community"<br>
</font></font></font><br>
<font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana">Do not discuss "issues
of accountability and transparency of MS processes" <br>
<br>
</font></font></font><font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana">Do not discuss</font>. "ICANN's processes"<br>
<br>
</font><font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana"><font face="Verdana">Do not discuss</font></font> "OECD's global
Internet policy making activities"<br>
<br>
Dont you have something to say about a developing country
government, UN or ITU.... <br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Friday 22 March 2013 12:25 PM,
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:8B36D3B3-E8A1-4369-8528-D92772A75AC9@hserus.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">What jurisdictional issues? In practice - where do you see USG actively interfering in ICANN affairs, except in broad concerns over governance where DOC / NTIA do set direction at times?
And do you see civil society and industry barred from an ICANN meet, ever?
--srs (iPad)
On 22-Mar-2013, at 3:34, Riaz K Tayob <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:riaz.tayob@gmail.com"><riaz.tayob@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Intergovernmental hegemony. Not quite for me.
Formal equality is one thing, but too equalising given the current jurisdiction issues with ICANN etc.
On 2013/03/21 10:54 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
Seems like until it happens we really do't know what it will be.
It could turn out to be a island of multistakeholder cooperation in a sea of inter-governmental hegemony.
avri
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</font></font></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br><span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br><span> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a></span><br><span>To be removed from the list, visit:</span><br><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>For all other list information and functions, see:</span><br><span> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a></span><br><span>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:</span><br><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>