<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Given that WSIS+10 and the MDG review both take place in 2015, shouldn't there be more interconnection between the two?<br>
<br><div>-- </div><div>Regards,</div><div> </div><div>Nick Ashton-Hart</div><div>Geneva Representative</div><div>Computer & Communications Industry Assocation (CCIA)</div><div>Tel: +41 (22) 534 99 45</div><div>Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44</div>
<div>Mobile: +41 79 595 5468<span class="Apple-style-span" style> </span></div>USA DID: +1 (202) 640-5430<div><br></div><div><b>Need to meet with me? Schedule the time that suits us both here: <a href="http://meetme.so/nashton">http://meetme.so/nashton</a></b></div>
<div><br></div><div><span style>Sent from my one of my handheld thingies, please excuse linguistic mangling.</span></div></div><div><br>On 27 Jan 2013, at 19:39, michael gurstein <<a href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com">gurstein@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>In addition to a focus on Internet Rights and Principles (R&P) for IGF-Bali,</span><br><span>there should also I believe, be a focus on WSIS +10 (upcoming in 2015) and</span><br>
<span>rather than de-emphasizing Internet Governance for Development (IG4D) it</span><br><span>should be re-oriented and revivified (if for no other reason than a natural</span><br><span>association with the LDC location of IGF-Bali) with an emphasis on the WSIS</span><br>
<span>declaration and how it might be updated in light of rapidly changing</span><br><span>circumstances. </span><br><span></span><br><span>The admittedly stale IG4D plenary sessions could be replaced by bringing to</span><br>
<span>the fore some of the emerging experiences (and new actors) in IG4D (in</span><br><span>mobiles and broadband for example) and then reflecting on the IG</span><br><span>issues/opportunities/gaps that are emerging.</span><br>
<span></span><br><span>And of course, there is a link between the R&P issue and WSIS +10 at least</span><br><span>through the WSIS Declaration's concern for an "inclusive Information</span><br><span>Society" (one of the reasons why it is so astonishing and disappointing that</span><br>
<span>the ISOC, IETF, IAB statement on standards recently noted on this list</span><br><span>omitted any mention or concern for "inclusion" as one of the principles on</span><br><span>which standards should be assessed).</span><br>
<span></span><br><span>M </span><br><span></span><br><span></span><br><span>-----Original Message-----</span><br><span>From: <a href="mailto:apeake@gmail.com">apeake@gmail.com</a> [<a href="mailto:apeake@gmail.com">mailto:apeake@gmail.com</a>] On Behalf Of Adam Peake</span><br>
<span>Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 9:27 AM</span><br><span>To: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>; Robert Guerra</span><br><span>Subject: Re: [governance] caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting</span><br>
<span></span><br><span>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Robert Guerra <<a href="mailto:rguerra@privaterra.org">rguerra@privaterra.org</a>></span><br><span>wrote:</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>Quick thoughts:</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>- Call for proposals: Should be done in an open and transparent fashion. I</span><br></blockquote><span>am of the opinion that the call should be done after the open</span><br>
<span>consultation/MAG meeting in Feb. That's been how it has been done in the</span><br><span>past, and works well.</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>Think you're wrong. The first meeting typically proposes themes for the</span><br>
<span>year. IGF website now says:</span><br><span></span><br><span>"Call for Contributions</span><br><span>Stakeholders are invited to submit written contributions taking stock of the</span><br><span>Baku 2012 IGF meeting and looking forward - suggestions on themes and</span><br>
<span>format, for the IGF 2013 meeting. Contributions should be emailed to</span><br><span><a href="mailto:igf@unog.ch">igf@unog.ch</a> before 14 February 2013."</span><br><span></span><br><span>Nothing new about this. The MAG should respond to contributions from</span><br>
<span>stakeholders. The first program paper will come soon after the Feb/March</span><br><span>meeting. It will layout themes for the year.</span><br><span></span><br><span>For the main themes, my suggestion is all five should remain as guides for</span><br>
<span>workshops, but security openness privacy, access, Internet governance for</span><br><span>development were poor in Baku and should be dropped as main sessions.</span><br><span>Taking stock and emerging issues should merge as a single session so that a</span><br>
<span>review of the week tells us which issues have 'emerged' as important and</span><br><span>provide pointers for themes for the next year (it makes little sense to have</span><br><span>emerging issues as anything other than a response to what we've learned over</span><br>
<span>the previous 3 days). Such a session might also help inform</span><br><span>recommendations/suggestions from the IGF.</span><br><span></span><br><span>Adam</span><br><span></span><br><span></span><br><span></span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>To not do so, would give the appearance that the MAG has already decided</span><br></blockquote><span>on issues/topics and is trying to impose them. That, is not acceptable.</span><br><blockquote type="cite">
<span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>- We seem to be still stuck on the same nomenclature for overall </span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>themes that were developed years ago. As I proposed at last year's IGF </span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>MAG consultations, we might want to see if the frame of "Stewardship" </span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>that is used in international relations discussions might be helpful</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>- In the proposed schedule below I don't see where issues such as Cyber</span><br></blockquote><span>Security, Openness, Surveillance, Rights & privacy would feed into. Yes,</span><br>
<span>they have been part of IGF's in the past, but they are still key issues of</span><br><span>concern for all stakeholders.</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>- If we want experiment with different formats for discussion and dialogue</span><br>
</blockquote><span>at the IGF, I would highly suggest we borrow approaches taken at other</span><br><span>highly successful meetings.</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Let's borrow from the success of a variety of informal/ad-hoc/Discussion</span><br></blockquote><span>Presentation formats (such as TED, "Davos Style" , unconfererence,</span><br><span>lightning talks, BOF's) are used successfully at other conferences such as</span><br>
<span>the IETF, Davos, Tech@State and TEDx.</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>More informal styles of engagement might prove to be a bit challenging to</span><br>
</blockquote><span>some stakeholder groups - such as governments - who aren't accustomed to</span><br><span>them. Success will require an experienced moderator/facilitator.</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Refs:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Unconference Format</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconference">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconference</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>TEDx</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span><a href="http://www.ted.com/tedx">http://www.ted.com/tedx</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>NTEN - Nonprofit Tech Conference</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span><a href="http://www.nten.org/ntc">http://www.nten.org/ntc</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Robert</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>--</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>R. Guerra</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/netfreedom">twitter.com/netfreedom</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Email: <a href="mailto:rguerra@privaterra.org">rguerra@privaterra.org</a></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>On 2013-01-27, at 6:59 AM, Adam Peake wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>I don't agree with Internet principles as the overall theme, but do </span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>agree it's a topic that needs significant focus. I think it's clear </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>after 7 IGFs that a session of 2 or 3 hours and a few scattered </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>workshops doesn't begin to scratch the surface of an issue. So how </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>could we use a day? Would more depth of discussion be more likely to </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>lead to some form of outcome?</span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Just a thought:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Structured discussion on the morning (might be a panel or a round </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>table in a plenary setting).</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Free, small group discussion middle of the day (working in small </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>ad-hoc groups to address issues and or questions identified during </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>the</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>morning)</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Back to "plenary" for shared discussion? (use moderators to manage </span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>the flow: some are getting very good at this role. For example, I </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>think Bill Drake and Jeanette Hofmann have been excellent. Better </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>than the "professionals".)</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>But just a thought, how else might a full day be used to develop a </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>useful dialogue about one topic?</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Schedule might look like:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Day 1. AM: Opening ceremony.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Day 1. PM: Critical Internet Resources (3 hours) Day 2. Enhanced </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Cooperation (2 hours sessions, work over "lunch") Day 3. Internet </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Principles (2 hours sessions, work over "lunch") Day 4. AM: Taking </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Stock and Emerging Issues (3 hours) Day 4. PM: Outcomes (1 hour). </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Closing Ceremony</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>My opinion, 3 hours is a long time and takes a good subject or it </span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>drags. Only CIR from Baku worked the 3 hours well. (IMHO etc etc)</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Adam</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:31 PM, parminder <<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a>></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><span>wrote:</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I may also remind that I had proposed that IGC supports the Internet </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Rights and Principles (IRP) Group which is likely to propose that</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>(1) Internet principles in some form be the overall theme of the </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>next IGF - Maybe something more descriptive as - 'public interest </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>principles for the Internet' or 'Shaping global principles for the</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><span>Internet'</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>(2) A round table on Internet Principles be held at the next IGF.</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>I am developing a first draft for the IRP Group, if IGC so wants I </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>can share it with IGC as well.</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>parminder</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>On Sunday 27 January 2013 04:46 PM, Adam Peake wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Hi Norbert,</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>No, sorry, no time to work on a draft. But look forward to </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>discussion and hopefully some consensus.</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Adam</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Norbert Bollow <<a href="mailto:nb@bollow.ch">nb@bollow.ch</a>> wrote:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>[with IGC Coordinator hat on]</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Adam Peake <<a href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>> wrote:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Resending email sent to the list on Jan 10. Deadline for </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>contributions is Feb 14.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Just over two weeks to agree any contribution.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Thanks for reminding us! This is urgent and imporant.</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Adam, are you willing and able to take the time to quickly produce a </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>first draft?</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Greetings,</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Norbert</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>A few comments for the February/March consultation.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Public archive of MAG mailing list needed, not been updated for a </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>year.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Workshops: too many. Cut to between 80 and 100. Make this target </span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>number known when the call for applications is published, might be </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>the first time quite a large number of proposals are rejected (might </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>think about implications of this for the IGF), people should expect </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>to be disappointed.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Minimum of 50% of MAG members must complete assessment of all </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>workshops.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Clarify rules for other sessions (open forums, dynamic coalition,</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>etc.)</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>No reason an initial call to prepare proposals can't be made before </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>the Feb meeting (more time better and the meetings a little later </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>than usual). A reminder to MAG members to ready their stakeholders.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>For workshops, keep the current themes (access, SOP </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>[security/openness/privacy], IG4D [Internet governance for </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>development], CIR [critical Internet resources], emerging issues).</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Have the MAG better define Internet Governance, how it must be </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>considered in workshop proposals (there are other spaces in WSIS </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>follow-up for non-IG issues). Use an evaluation form for workshops </span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>(at the moment don't even know if a room was empty or overflowing, </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>simple count a good idea.) However, indications are that while </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>there were too many workshops in Baku many were strong in content, </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>well received. MAG should not cut what looks like a success to </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>favor the floundering main sessions.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Merging not the always the solution, it's too easy an answer for MAG </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>in their evaluation to say merge simply because proposals have </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>similar words in the title. If merging proposed then the new </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>workshop needs support or tendency to end up with 2 workshops in the </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>same space (merge in name only).</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Overall theme for 2013: "enhanced cooperation -- meaningful </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>participation of developing countries in Internet governance".</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Main sessions. Mix up the formats, 3 hours generally too long, some </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>poorly attended in Baku and many grumbled complaints about poor </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>content, poor preparation, repeating issues from previous years, etc.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Some main sessions need better preparation (and some were good - </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>transcripts illustrate the differences, MAG needs to be aware they </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>have a role to complete, not last minute for a meeting of the IGF's</span><br></blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>importance.) Invite speakers early. Use (look for) funds to </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>support speakers.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Taking stock and emerging issues: mix the two sessions, then </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>justifies 3 hours. Probably best held on the final morning (i.e.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>emerging issues become issues the IGF thinks emerging as important </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>for the coming year(s)).</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>Final afternoon: session on outcomes (1 hour), followed by closing.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Critical Internet Resources (strong session in Baku, justifies 3 </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>hours). Keep as before.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>New theme: Enhanced Cooperation. Sessions in mixed formats over 1 </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>day, e.g. Morning expert panel session 2 hours. Follow by a long </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>break where people encouraged to join self-organizing small groups </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>to discuss a few set questions and ideas from the morning panel.</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Afternoon, 2 hour moderated session with audience only, no </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>panel/experts etc. Bring back comments from the small groups.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>New theme: Internet principles. One day, perhaps same format as </span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>suggested for enhanced cooperation. Try something different.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Development aspect of IG always overlooked and too often "governance"</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>lost as discussion focuses on IT for development. Open specific </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>public comment on design/scope of IG4D session. Bring back to the </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>May meeting to decide on topics and format.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Time to drop access and SOP as main sessions, but keep as workshops </span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>and perhaps round-tables.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Adam</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>To be removed from the list, visit:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>For all other list information and functions, see:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">
<span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>To be removed from the list, visit:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>For all other list information and functions, see:</span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></span><br>
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>To be removed from the list, visit:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>For all other list information and functions, see:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span></span><br><span></span><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br>
<span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br><span> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a></span><br><span>To be removed from the list, visit:</span><br>
<span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>For all other list information and functions, see:</span><br><span> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a></span><br>
<span>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:</span><br><span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></span><br>
</div></blockquote></body></html>