<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">
      <div class="moz-signature"> On 01/26/2013 03:58 AM, Roland Perry
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:miMQK+RcHvARFAYf@internetpolicyagency.com"
      type="cite">In message <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
        href="mailto:5102AD28.9090901@ITforChange.net"><5102AD28.9090901@ITforChange.net></a>,
      at 23:04:56 on Fri, 25 Jan 2013,
      =?UTF-8?B?R3VydSDgpJfgpYHgpLDgpYE=?= <a
        class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Guru@ITforChange.net"><Guru@ITforChange.net></a>
      writes <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">you say 'different forms of democracy', is
        plutocracy another form of democracy? <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Only if everyone in the country in question is wealthy. So Monaco,
      perhaps? <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Ronald,<br>
    then can you explain what you mean by 'different forms of democracy'
    in which the lobbying power of money varies across countries?<br>
    <br>
    Also <br>
    "The word plutocracy is almost always used as a pejorative to
    describe or warn against an undesirable condition,<sup
      id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"><a
        href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy#cite_note-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a></sup><sup
      id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"><a
        href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a></sup>
    and throughout history political thinkers such as <a
      href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Churchill"
      title="Winston Churchill">Winston Churchill</a>, 19th-century
    French <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociologist"
      title="Sociologist" class="mw-redirect">sociologist</a> and <a
      href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historian" title="Historian">historian</a>
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville"
      title="Alexis de Tocqueville">Alexis de Tocqueville</a> and
    19th-century Spanish <a
      href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchist" title="Monarchist"
      class="mw-redirect">monarchist</a> <a
      href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Donoso_Cort%C3%A9s"
      title="Juan Donoso Cortés">Juan Donoso Cortés</a> have condemned
    those they characterize as plutocrats for ignoring their <a
      href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_responsibility"
      title="Social responsibility">social responsibilities</a> to the
    poor, <u><b>using their power to serve their own purposes</b></u>
    and thereby increasing poverty and nurturing <a
      href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict" title="Class
      conflict">class conflict</a>, and corrupting their societies with
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greed" title="Greed">greed</a>
    and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism"
      title="Hedonism">hedonism</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-4"
      class="reference"><a
        href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy#cite_note-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a></sup><sup
      id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"><a
        href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy#cite_note-5"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a></sup>
    (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy</a>)<br>
    <br>
    <b>This seems to be the direction that US seems to be moving
      towards, with the vastly disproportionate influence of the monied
      in policy making.</b> This phenomenon is also true for most other
    countries including India, but with most large IT transnationals
    being head quartered in the US and with US domestic law
    unfortunately* the defacto global law, the need/scope for policy
    lobbying/corruption is much higher in the US.<br>
    <br>
    regards,<br>
    Guru<br>
    * I would think it axiomatic that global democracy will require a
    league of nations and nationalities and not any one having any
    pre-eminent position, so it is disappointing (though not surprising)
    that we get responses on the list about 'US eminent role/ US
    exceptionalism' being good or inevitable. To quote that great
    American, Abraham Lincoln "No man is good enough to govern another
    man without that other man’s consent", something many Americans on
    this list and other nationals favoring US eminence in IG, may want
    to ponder about. <br>
  </body>
</html>