<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="+1">Agree, and I think that <font size="+1">Jeremy and
Joana and Wolfgang's suggestions are not mutuall<font size="+1">y
exclusive.<br>
<br>
<font size="+1">We can send a letter, and ask member<font
size="+1">-states and sector members to also raise this
issue and make sure that our letter is discussed.<br>
<br>
<font size="+1">Best<br>
<br>
<font size="+1">Anriette<br>
<br>
</font></font></font></font></font></font></font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/01/2013 12:43, "Kleinwächter,
Wolfgang" wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2DA93620FC07494C926D60C8E3C2F1A8013314B4@server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Joana and all
there is another PrepMeeting for the WTPF in February in Geneva.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.itu.int/en/wtpf-13/Pages/ieg.aspx">http://www.itu.int/en/wtpf-13/Pages/ieg.aspx</a>
It is important to raise this question in this meeting. I have no idea whether this meeting (February 6 - 8, 2013 in the ITU HQ) is open. If not we should send a letter to like minded governments and to the ITU SG before February 6 and to push for a clear response to our request for equal participation in the WTPF, independent from national governmental delegations.
Wolfgang
________________________________
Von: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a> im Auftrag von Joana Varon
Gesendet: Do 17.01.2013 04:55
An: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>; Jeremy Malcolm
Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bestbits@lists.igcaucus.org"><bestbits@lists.igcaucus.org></a>
Betreff: Re: [governance] Multistakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
Dear Jeremy and all,
Regarding your observation and the fact that a couple of civil society representatives were able to have a meeting with Mr Toure during the WCIT and managed to deliver to him our statement that reinforced some points of the best bits statement, including demands for an open participation of CS in ITU processes, isn't it the time to recall him of our "Civil Society statement on the new ITRs and the future of multi-stakeholder engagement" and try to ask for the changes he has promised to try to make during our meeting?
Please, correct me if it seams too naive, but if we go again through these alternative channels to submit our comments and so on( such as CS being part of government delegation - it's own or other "friendly" governements, or just engaging with sector members), we will just repeat the quite frustrating (lack of) participation scenery of WCIT at WTPF.
Maybe Wolfgang, Avri or other fellows that have attended WCIT could have some thoughts to add on this.
best,
joana
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</a>
executive director, association for progressive communications
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.apc.org">www.apc.org</a>
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax +27 11 726 1692</pre>
</body>
</html>