##  +1   ##<br>- - -<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Chaitanya Dhareshwar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chaitanyabd@gmail.com" target="_blank">chaitanyabd@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">+1<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Pranesh Prakash <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pranesh@cis-india.org" target="_blank">pranesh@cis-india.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>

</div></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">
I can't think of any good reasons against the proposed amendments, and<br>
support both Amendment 1, and Amendment 2 (both parts).<br>
<br>
Minor corrections:<br>
"term limited" -> "term-limited"<br>
"term -limited" -> "term-limited" / "limited-term"<br>
<br>
~ Pranesh<br>
<br>
Norbert Bollow [2013-01-09 23:15]:<br>
<div><div>> I support the two amendment proposals below, subject to the<br>
> noted typo corrections...<br>
><br>
> Greetings,<br>
> Norbert<br>
><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>