<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    Hopefully we are done with the inquest into figurative and other
    meanings of 'walkout', though we all know it was never really about
    it. Before I come to what it really is or was about, let me too
    indulge a bit on the meaning and context of 'walking out'.....<br>
    <br>
    1. When countries declare their disassociation from a ongoing treaty
    etc process, it is very often called out as a walkout. Walking out
    of trade talks, climate negotiations, doha round of WTO.... Such is
    a regular use of the phrase.<br>
    <br>
    2. WCIT was an event with the sole objective of negotiating a
    treaty. Declaring the intention not to sign the treaty as the
    process is still on is called as walking out on or of the
    process..... That is what the US did, and that is a walkout. (By the
    way, the head of US delegation was reported to use the term 'waking
    out of WCIT' is a figurative manner mid way during the conference.
    Although he later denied he said what was attibuted to him, the
    concerned reporter, I think from CommDay, later confirmed that he
    had indeed said so.)<br>
    <br>
    3. Being from a poor Southern background, I am forced to take the
    cover of what an American said. Well, a regular columnist of the New
    York Times,  Eric Pfanner wrote that US "refused to sign the
    document and <b>left in a huff</b>"... Did anyone see the US
    huffing.. Were the members of the US delegation huffing or the whole
    country.... Those on the ground can please let me know. I am really
    very eager. Avri, Adam, McTim, Rony..... any one of you know the
    'facts' in this case....<br>
    <br>
    4. I knew the vulnerabilities of a poor Southie writing what would
    get forwarded to the mighty in the IG space... I knew that the
    wolves are out there..... and so, I actually quoted Eric Pfanner in
    my article. And it was from his expression that I built the 'walking
    out' thing..... Hope, a day will come when we from the post-colonial
    South would not need to do such kinds of things to earn legitimacy
    for simple facts that otherwise are there for anyone to see..... I
    must have read 40-50 articles and statements and postings before I
    wrote what I wrote, because, as I said, I knew the wolves will come
    pouncing. And they did come in any case, if for nothing else, to
    interrogate the use of English language by me....<br>
    <br>
    5. I am sure Terry Kramer himself must have read the NYT article...
    I did not see him or anyone else issue angry disclaimers for factual
    inaccuracy which they definitely would have if there indeed would
    have been one (I mean about 'leaving in a huff'). So, this is a case
    of the above mentioned wolves being more loyal then the emperor.
    Very worrying tendency for civil society indeed. <br>
    <br>
    6. And of course, all of you too read the referred NYT article,
    which was forwarded by me with the subject like 'NYT expresses
    surprise at US <b>walkout</b>'.<br>
    <br>
    7. There continues to be many articles in the Northern press using
    the term 'US walkout' for what happened, most of them though
    agreeing with what the US did, which is not the point here. It is
    just about the use of that term and the kind of vicious reaction
    that it attracted.<br>
    <br>
    The vicious reaction was of course to forcefully shut up anyone who
    but dare give a view or analysis which does not meekly accept the
    dominant discourse on the subject - which, in my view is guided and
    led by the global political an economic elites, who unfortunately
    have been able to build a very loyal following in what is being
    called as civil society. As said, I see this as a very disturbing
    trend. Therefore the issue is beyond just the uncivility of the
    response, it is about what and who do they represent to become so
    vicious just on reading an opinion piece that says that US walked
    out of the treaty process, and may have made a diplomatic blunder in
    doing so. <br>
    <br>
    parminder <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 22 December 2012 09:28 AM,
      Tracey Naughton wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:4DDC5AF2-5051-4A05-A098-6D653C4869A6@traceynaughton.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div>Arguing about English is an excluding distraction not
        conducive to the basis of multi-stakeholder dialogue. Sad to see
        on a CS list. The article was an opinion piece.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>That said, as someone who remains very interested in the post
        WSIS goings on, I have appreciated the diversity of opinions
        that have emerged to assist me with understanding what actually
        happened at WCIT, so thanks for your enthusiastic discussions.<br>
        <br>
        Tracey Naughton
        <div>
          <div>Australia</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><br>
        On 22 Dec 2012, at 12:22 PM, "michael gurstein" <<a
          moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com">gurstein@gmail.com</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <div>
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
          medium)">
        <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Helvetica;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Helvetica;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
tt
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        font-family:"Courier New";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:8.0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.hoenzb
        {mso-style-name:hoenzb;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:"Consolas","serif";}
span.BalloonTextChar
        {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle23
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">All
              of this phony outrage is a bit much…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Being
              outraged about a zillion dollar corporation not wanting to
              pay its fair share of taxes… that's something to be
              outraged about…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Being
              outraged at countries in the North turning their backs on
              agreements to extend broadband access to countries in the
              South… that's something to be outraged about…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Being
              outraged at countries not willing to sign agreements
              re-interating already agreed to commitments in the area of
              Human Rights… that's something to be outraged about…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">But
              whether the US walked out, tromped out, slid out, or flew
              out of the meeting on gossamer wings (after refusing to
              sign an agreement accepted by 2/3rds of the countries
              attending) … that seems to me to be a matter of the utmost
              triviality … of interest, dare I say, only to those who
              don't have anything more substantial to argue against…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">M<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
              [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>]
              <b>On Behalf Of </b>Koven Ronald<br>
              <b>Sent:</b> Friday, December 21, 2012 4:27 PM<br>
              <b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>;
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:lehto.paul@gmail.com">lehto.paul@gmail.com</a>;
              <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a><br>
              <b>Cc:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com">gurstein@gmail.com</a><br>
              <b>Subject:</b> Re: [governance] A false consensus is
              broken<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">What
              the devil is a "figurative walkout" ? There was
              misrepresentation or factual error. Period. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">No
                reputable media outlet would or should accept that. A
                correction would be in order.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">Orwellian
                language is not in order.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">If
                we can't count on basic intellectual honesty, there is
                no sense in these discussions. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">Bests,
                  Rony Koven<o:p></o:p></span></p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
                    <br>
                    <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">-----Original
                      Message-----<br>
                      From: Paul Lehto <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:lehto.paul@gmail.com">lehto.paul@gmail.com</a>><br>
                      To: governance <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>>;
                      Avri Doria <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>><br>
                      Cc: michael gurstein <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com">gurstein@gmail.com</a>><br>
                      Sent: Fri, Dec 21, 2012 9:02 pm<br>
                      Subject: Re: [governance] A false consensus is
                      broken<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  <div
                    id="AOLMsgPart_2_2a10f422-fe87-4930-9d40-52e6c7058ec7">
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
                        But what is truly at issue is not a "fact" like
                        whether someone physically locomoted using their
                        legs in order to leave a meeting.  "Walked out"
                        has both literal and figurative meaning, and
                        Parminder - as was obvious to me at least -
                        intended the phrase in a figurative way.   This
                        should be especially obvious because it was a
                        country (having no legs) that walked out, not a
                        specific person. <br>
                        <br>
                        Since it appears some have appointed themselves
                        inquisitors and made a charge of inaccuracy
                        against Parminder, I assert my neutrality (not
                        even sure why people are so hot on this), and <b>appoint
                          myself judge and dismiss this claim, </b>on
                        the grounds that "walked out" has clearly
                        figurative meaning and the actual facts, even as
                        alleged by the inquisitors, fit without the
                        broad meaning of "walked out". :) <br>
                        <br>
                        The key word in Michael's question was
                        "pre-occupation."  Why the <u>pre-occupation</u>
                        with this? It appears that question is unlikely
                        to be answered. And I won't rule on it either,
                        since I don't have enough facts before me to do
                        so.  :) <br>
                        <br>
                        Paul Lehto, J.D.<br>
                        <br>
                        PS  If anyone has a problem with me being the
                        self-appointed judge here, then they should have
                        a very similar problem with those who have
                        accused and also called this an open and shut
                        case of "you can't have your own facts" - which
                        is just judgment in a different form, and a
                        self-appointed judgment at that.  In order to
                        reach my "judgment" I've looked at the facts in
                        the light most favorable to the accused, given
                        the rights of free expression at stake.  <br>
                        <br>
                        All we really have here is what could be a
                        valuable discussion about the extent to which
                        there was or wasn't a <i>figurative</i> walk
                        out, and that could be enlightening given the
                        personal observations of some on the list but
                        which devolved into something more <i>ad
                          hominem</i> in the nature of a game of gotcha.<br>
                        <br>
                        <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">On
                          Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Avri Doria <<a
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>>
                          wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"
                          style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
                            <br>
                            <br>
                            On 21 Dec 2012, at 10:13, michael gurstein
                            wrote:<br>
                            <br>
                            > Or Parminder used/quoted colourful
                            journalistic language in a journalistic
                            medium...<br>
                            ><br>
                            > Anyway, why this pre-occupation with
                            one perhaps infelicitous turn of
                            (journalistic/diplomatic?) phrase ... Is
                            this the US Congress/Fox News where a fairly
                            comprehensible mispeak can lead to a total
                            "gothcha" pre-occupation (the Benghazi
                            "discussions") for purely political purposes
                            to the exclusion of substantive debate...<br>
                            <br>
                            <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                      </div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">It
                          is simple:<br>
                          <br>
                          Because you are not permitted to have your own
                          facts.<br>
                        </span><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#888888"><br>
                          <span class="hoenzb">avri</span><br>
                          <br>
                          <br>
                        </span><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
                          You received this message as a subscriber on
                          the list:<br>
                               <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
                          To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
                               <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
                            target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
                          <br>
                          For all other list information and functions,
                          see:<br>
                               <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
                            target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
                          To edit your profile and to find the IGC's
                          charter, see:<br>
                               <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
                            target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
                          <br>
                          Translate this email: <a
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
                            target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    </div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
                        <br clear="all">
                        <br>
                        -- <br>
                        Paul R Lehto, J.D.<br>
                        P.O. Box 1 <br>
                        Ishpeming, MI  49849 <br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:lehto.paul@gmail.com">lehto.paul@gmail.com</a><br>
                        906-204-4965 (cell)<br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div
                    id="AOLMsgPart_3_2a10f422-fe87-4930-9d40-52e6c7058ec7">
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">____________________________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">     <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">To be removed from the list, visit:<o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">     <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">For all other list information and functions, see:<o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">     <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">     <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></tt></pre>
                    <pre style="background:white"><tt><span style="color:black">Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><o:p></o:p></span></tt></pre>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br>
        <span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br>
        <span>     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a></span><br>
        <span>To be removed from the list, visit:</span><br>
        <span>     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a></span><br>
        <span></span><br>
        <span>For all other list information and functions, see:</span><br>
        <span>     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a></span><br>
        <span>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:</span><br>
        <span>     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a></span><br>
        <span></span><br>
        <span>Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></span><br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>