<div dir="ltr">Dear Parminder,<div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The exchange you mention, regarding the sentence "<i>recognize(s) the right of access of Member States to international telecommunication services</i>" was probably the most sadly ironic turn of events. The reality behind the appearances is rather simple: </font></div>
<div style><ul style><li style><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">on one hand, the US continues to box itself in a corner because its policy vis-à-vis Cuba forces it to reject such a simple statement, that should on the contrary be something they support wholeheartedly and be even the flag-bearer for (given their general position) </span><br>
</li><li style><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">there is on the other hand a strong dose of hypocrisy when some of the governmental proponents of this sentence systematically prevent their own citizens from accessing the Internet in a sufficiently free manner.</span></li>
</ul></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">This is a sad game that is being played in every single UN-type conference. </font><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">One of the best examples of a purely political game that has no positive impact on users. Your comment: "</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">This point above seems central to all the discussions here on what is being called as 'a new approach to Internet governance'" is therefore probably overstated. The real debate is elsewhere. </span></div>
<div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Anyway, this certainly was not the main reason why the US and other countries refused to sign the WCIT text. The text itself was less the issue than the fact that it was adopted by voting - and Iran bears a responsibility in this outcome. But there were other issues, as you well know. </font></div>
<div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">That being said, I agree with one of your previous comments: this general outcome was in no way certain and the WCIT could very well have ended in a different way. Fatigue, missteps, and procedural malfunction tilted the result in one direction, but the discussions could have led to another result. In any case, this is an outcome with no winners, rather a lose-lose-lose result given the amount of energy devoted to this.</font></div>
<div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The three years ahead of us (2013 to 2015) will provide a lot of occasions to continue these debates in various venues. I hope the main lesson form the WCIT will be that we all can do better than this theater. </font></div>
<div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Best</font></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div style>
<font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Bertrand</font></div><div style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.499999046325684px"><br>
</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:16 PM, parminder <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank">parminder@itforchange.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<font face="Verdana">Dear Bertrand/ Others<br>
<br>
<br>
</font><div class="im">
<div>On Wednesday 12 December 2012 01:43 AM,
<a href="mailto:bdelachapelle@gmail.com" target="_blank">bdelachapelle@gmail.com</a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Dear Matthias,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I agree with your thesis. </div>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Which I understand, to quote Matthias' email, is about<br>
<br>
<blockquote>"...crystallization of the application of the
international customary law norm of non-interference to other
states' Internet access. Indeed, the stability and functionality
of the Internet can by now be clearly considered to lie in the
common interest. As such, it is protected by international law.
States that violate this common obligation engage their
international responsibility."<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Now what have you all to say about the US and its allies walking out
of the WCIT on the point of refusing to sign on preambular language
that simply "recognize(s) the right of access of Member States to
international telecommunication services".<br>
<br>
This point above seems central to all the discussions here on what
is being called as 'a new approach to Internet governance'. <br>
<br>
Wonder, why the US is able to get away with such monstrosities, and
civil society choses to look the other way when they happen. Nay,
people have in fact been defending US's position of not signing the
above text on this list and other CS forums..... One wonders what is
happening!!!<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
parminder <br></font></span><div><div class="h5">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Very happy to hear about this article of yours. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My German is unfortunately probably not good enough to get
all of it, but Paul Fehlinger (copied on this mail), who is
working with me on the I&J project, is German and will
certainly help me get the best of it. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Would you have it in electronic format?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>By the way, this contributes to the documentation of cases
illustrating the non-trains boundary harm principle introduced
in the Council of Europe recommendation.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks very much for the information. We will read with great
interest.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This will.<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPad</div>
<div><br>
On 11 déc. 2012, at 19:38, "Matthias C. Kettemann" <<a href="mailto:matthias.kettemann@uni-graz.at" target="_blank">matthias.kettemann@uni-graz.at</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
Cher Bertrand, dear all, <br>
<br>
I'd even go one step further. In a article published in the
Heidelberg Journal of International Law, I argued that the
example of Egypt is not only reflective of an emerging
international principle but even indicative of the
crystallization of the application of the international
customary law norm of non-interference to other states'
Internet access. Indeed, the stability and functionality of
the Intenret can by now be clearly considered to lie in the
common interest. As such, it is protected by international
law. States that violate this common obligation engage their
international responsibility.<br>
<br>
(I'm happy to share the article on an individual basis if
you're interested (but it's in German): <i>K</i><i><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">ettemann</span></i><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">,
Das Internet als internationales Schutzgut:
Entwicklungsperspektiven des Internetvölkerrechts
anlässlich des Arabischen Frühlings [The Internet als a
Global Object of Protection: Perspectives on International
Internet Law in Light of the Arab Spring],</span><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"" lang="DE"> ZaöRV/Heidelberg Journal of Int'l Law 72 (2012),
469-482</span><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><u></u><u></u></span>
)<br>
<br>
Kind regards<br>
Matthias<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>Am 11.12.2012 18:11, schrieb
Bertrand de La Chapelle:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">Dear Nick,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Just a brief comment on the issue of "transit traffic".
This is an interesting component to explore. As I have
often said, I believe that Egypt acted in reference to an
implicit emerging international principle of "<b>non-tampering
with transit traffic</b>" when it blocked access to the
Internet during the Arab Spring but did not impact the
transit traffic serving the easter coast of Africa. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Discussing this in more detail would indeed be useful
and could probably be part of an international/global
regime. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bertrand</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:27 PM,
Nick Ashton-Hart <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nashton@ccianet.org" target="_blank">nashton@ccianet.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<div>Funny, I have been thinking of the Law of the
Sea for a few weeks as an interesting construct
for the legal protection of the open flow of data.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It is true that there's a built environment to
the Internet - but in maritime law ships are also
physical and registered with a state. However, the
space they travel through, beyond the territorial
waters limit, is open sea and by definition not
owned by anyone.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If we used this construct to protect the flow
of international data, that might be a workable
metaphor. The Law of the Sea embodied in UNCLOS
is, after all, largely simply a distillation of
internationally-understood principles about
maritime law that go back to the Roman period. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We could do much worse than an international
understanding that data, when transiting any
country between a source and destination in third
countries, was legally not actually 'in' the
territory or subject to the laws of the state it
was transiting, but subject only to an
international regime. <br>
<br>
(Bertrand: these ideas are what I was speaking of
when I told you at Baku I had an idea for your
jurisdiction project that might have potential).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>FWIW: For those who are about to remind me, I
am aware that the USG has yet to ratify UNCLOS. It
is clear that the current Administration is very
much in favour of doing so, however, as are many
members of the legislative branch).<br>
<div>-- </div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Nick Ashton-Hart</div>
<div>Geneva Representative</div>
<div>Computer & Communications Industry
Assocation (CCIA)</div>
<div>Tel: <a href="tel:%2B41%20%2822%29%20534%2099%2045" value="+41225349945" target="_blank">+41 (22)
534 99 45</a></div>
<div>Fax: : <a href="tel:%2B41%20%2822%29%20594-85-44" value="+41225948544" target="_blank">+41 (22)
594-85-44</a></div>
<div>Mobile: <a href="tel:%2B41%2079%20595%205468" value="+41795955468" target="_blank">+41 79
595 5468</a><span> </span></div>
USA DID: <a href="tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20640-5430" value="+12026405430" target="_blank">+1 (202)
640-5430</a>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div><b>Need to meet with me? Schedule the time
that suits us both here: <a href="http://meetme.so/nashton" target="_blank">http://meetme.so/nashton</a></b></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span>Sent from my one of my handheld
thingies, please excuse linguistic mangling.</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
On 7 Dec 2012, at 16:23, "Dr. Alejandro
Pisanty Baruch" <<a href="mailto:apisan@unam.mx" target="_blank">apisan@unam.mx</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div style="direction:ltr;font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New"> Jovan,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>thanks for doing a pretty innovative
thing here: discussing ideas. Further,
bringing a fresh approach and actual
expertise. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My long-standing concern for
analogies between Internet governance
and the laws of the sea is that the
Internet is much more a built
environment than the sea (not that the
sea is all natural and in fixed form
forever, immune to our contamination and
our imagintion.) </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So Internet governance refers not
only to rules etc. to live on the
existing Internet, but also has to be
useful as guidance in its expansion and
development. To abuse your analogy, it's
not only about shipping, fishing, and
mining, but also about how to actually
make the oceans of tomorrow. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That brings you to points like: you
can use Ostromian theory to understand
the tragedy of the commons in fisheries;
but can you extend it to Internet
governance? What are the limitations?
Can you address concerns from liberals
to socialists in a new framework without
actually changing the salinity or
wanting to reverse the flow of the
Humboldt current? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Any thoughts?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yours,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Alejandro Pisanty<br>
<div><br>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px">
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px"><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New"> </font></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px"><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New">! !!
!!! !!!!</font></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px"><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"></span></span><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New">NEW
PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO
DE TELÉFONO</font></span></span></div>
<p><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"></span></span> </p>
<p><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New"><a href="tel:%2B52-1-5541444475" value="+5215541444475" target="_blank">+52-1-5541444475</a>
FROM ABROAD </font></span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New"><a href="tel:%2B525541444475" value="+525541444475" target="_blank">+525541444475</a>
DESDE MÉXICO </font></span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New">SMS <a href="tel:%2B525541444475" value="+525541444475" target="_blank">+525541444475</a>
<br>
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty<br>
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000,
04510 Mexico DF Mexico<br>
<br>
Blog: <a href="http://pisanty.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://pisanty.blogspot.com</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty</a><br>
Unete al grupo UNAM en
LinkedIn, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614</a><br>
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/apisanty" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/apisanty</a><br>
---->> Unete a ISOC
Mexico, <a href="http://www.isoc.org" target="_blank">http://www.isoc.org</a><br>
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . </font></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Times New Roman">
<hr>
<div style="direction:ltr"><font color="#000000" face="Tahoma"><b>Desde:</b>
<a href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>]
en nombre de Jovan Kurbalija [<a href="mailto:jovank@diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">jovank@diplomacy.edu</a>]<br>
<b>Enviado el:</b> viernes, 07 de
diciembre de 2012 08:37<br>
<b>Hasta:</b> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>;
McTim<br>
<b>Asunto:</b> Re: [governance]
Internetistan, or the Bit Boat...
a new approach to Internet
governance!<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div>Well, we have innovation! With
the IGF in Bali, and ICANN on a
cruise ship, we may have 'beach or
floating governance'. Internet
governance could be fun!<br>
<div><br>
I like the metaphor of the ship
since it implies our common
destiny. We are all passengers of
ICANNia or ITUnia or...<b>?</b>
Metaphors are also useful to
remove our tunnel vision and make
us think more creatively. In
another metaphor, I hope that
Internetistan will resist
Absurdistan (<a href="http://diplo.smugmug.com/ILLUSTRATIONS/Posters-1/4464706_T4FW6r#%21i=1104113260&k=2GsD8hV&lb=1&s=A" target="_blank">here is the map
of this fast-growing country</a>).
<br>
<br>
But back to the current reality.
Unfortunately, the ICANN cruise
ship won't solve the problem of
internationalisation. 'Open sea'
refers only to freedom of
navigation. It does not deal with
the status of the ship. All
relations on the ship are
regulated by the national law of
the ship's flag. ICANNia has to be
registered somewhere. One solution
could be a flag of convenience
such as Liberia or Panama. What
happens on the ICANNia is
regulated by national law, with no
major differences from any other
land-based entity (company,
organisation). Yes, ICANNia can
sail in whatever direction it
wants to sail, but the decision
must be made by the captain
according to the rules of the
flag's state. Extrapolating from
the role of the captain on the
ship, the ICANNia would look like
military unit. The cruise ship
metaphor gets even more
interesting when we consider
different classes of cabins,
rescue operations, etc.<br>
<br>
These thoughts have taken me back
to Hugo Grotius's book <i>Mare
Liberum</i> that established the
"open sea" concept four centuries
ago as opposed to the idea of a <i>Mare
Nostrum</i>. <font color="#cc0000"><b> </b></font>His
relevance for our time is
sobering. If we replace 'sea' with
'Internet' we could have the next
book on the Internet. Grotius was
a very interesting personality.<font color="#cc0000"><b> </b></font>
Besides being one of the first
international lawyers, he was one
of the founders of the 'natural
law' school of thought. In
addition, he wrote a lot about
social contract (before Rousseau,
Locke, and others). As a matter of
fact, his social contract theory
could be applicable to the
Internet. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
When it comes to the concept of open
sea, Grotius had an interesting
interplay with the political masters
of his era. He believed in open
sea, but Dutch and British
authorities quickly realised the
usefulness of his doctrine. They had
the biggest fleets and had ambitions
to develop trade and colonial
empires. Grotius provided them with
the necessary doctrine or 'political
software'. However, Grotius always
argued that 'open sea' needs rules
and principles in order to be
'open'. Although it was
counter-intuitive to the leaders of
two growing maritime powers, he
managed to convince them that it was
in their best interest to 'tame'
their comparative powers and ensure
the sustainability of their empires
beyond the 17th century. Everything
else has written the history, which
proved Grotius right. We can draw
many parallels, with the necessary
caution that historical analogies
should be handled with care. <br>
<br>
While we are waiting for a new
Grotius (or Godot), we should review
how we debate Internet governance
issues. Grotius was a great scholar
who mastered the existing rules
before he started changing them. We,
on the other hand, use well-defined
and developed concepts in a relaxed
way. A few examples...<br>
<br>
As we saw, the frequently used
metaphor of the open sea does not
translate to an open Internet. In
many respects, it can lead in the
opposite direction (Internet
Nostrum). <br>
<br>
Another example is the role of
states' responsibility in the
Internet era. This is a well-defined
concept in international law. If we
want states to be responsible for
whatever is originating in their
territories (e.g. cyber-attacks,
botnets), we have to give them the
tools to ensure their responsibility
(mainly state control, regulation,
and surveillance). Most writings on
state responsibility start from the
opposite assumption, i.e. the
limited role of the state. With all
the creativity and imagination in
the world, we still cannot have it
both ways. <br>
<br>
The most topical example of the need
for evidence-based policy is the
case of the Red Cross name/emblem at
ICANN. There are very clear rules
for the protection of the Red Cross
name/emblem that were adopted some
100 years ago and have been
followed, without reservation, on
national and international levels.
ICANN was right in protecting the
Red Cross name but made the mistake
of putting it together with
organisations that do not enjoy the
same status (the International
Olympic Committee). <br>
<br>
Even if we want to change the rules
in order to adjust to
the specificities of the Internet
era (if any), we have first to
master them. I see here an important
role for academic and civil society
communities. If we had advised ICANN
to evaluate the Red Cross and IOC
submissions separately, we could
have avoided a lot of policy
confusion and wasted time. <br>
<br>
The GIGANET might consider the
evidence-based policy research as
the key theme for the next meeting?<br>
<br>
Regards, Jovan <br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 12/6/12 3:31 PM, McTim
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">All,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If domiciling ICANN in a
nation state is problematic,
perhaps ICANN could buy this
cruise ship as a HQ:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="http://cruiseship.homestead.com/Cruise-Ship.html" target="_blank">http://cruiseship.homestead.com/Cruise-Ship.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It would help solve the
problem of internationalisation,
be a permanent host for ICANN
meetings (2450 berths....saving
hotel costs for all) and
generate revenue
intersessionally. It's a 3-fer,
plus it's a snip @~ 300 million
USD!!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
McTim<br>
"A name indicates what we seek.
An address indicates where it
is. A route indicates how we get
there." Jon Postel<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div>-- <br>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><b><span>Jovan
<span>Kurbalija</span>,
PhD</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span>Director,
<span> DiploFoundation</span></span><span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span lang="FR-CH">Rue de Lausanne
56 </span><b><span lang="FR-CH">| </span></b><span lang="FR-CH">1202 Geneva</span><span lang="FR-CH"> </span><b><span lang="FR-CH">|</span></b><b><span lang="FR-CH"> </span></b><span lang="FR-CH">Switzerland</span><span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span><b><span>Tel.</span></b><span>
</span><span lang="FR-CH"><a href="tel:%2B41%20%280%29%2022%207410435" value="+41227410435" target="_blank">+41 (0)
22 7410435</a> </span><b><span lang="FR-CH">| </span></b><b><span lang="FR-CH">Mobile.</span></b></span><span lang="FR-CH"> <a href="tel:%2B41%20%280%29%20797884226" value="+41797884226" target="_blank">+41 (0)
797884226</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><b><span>Email:
</span></b><span lang="FR-CH"><a href="mailto:jovank@diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">jovank@diplomacy.edu</a></span><span> </span><span>
</span><b><span lang="FR-CH">|
</span></b><b><span lang="FR-CH">Twitter:</span></b><span lang="FR-CH">
@jovankurbalija</span><span> </span><span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d" lang="FR-CH">The latest
from Diplo:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d" lang="FR-CH"> </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/currently" target="_blank">today –
this week – this month</a>
<b><span style="color:red">l</span></b>
<a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/conferences/innovation" target="_blank">
Conference on Innovation
in Diplomacy (Malta, 19-20
November 2012)</a> <b> <span style="color:red">l</span>
</b><a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses" target="_blank">new online
courses</a></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial" lang="EN-US"></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>____________________________________________________________</span>
<div><br>
<span>You received this message as a
subscriber on the list:</span><br>
<span> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a></span><br>
<span>To be removed from the list, visit:</span><br>
<span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>For all other list information and
functions, see:</span><br>
<span> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a></span><br>
<span>To edit your profile and to find the
IGC's charter, see:</span><br>
<span> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></span><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
____________________<br>
Bertrand de La Chapelle
<div>Internet & Jurisdiction Project Director,
International Diplomatic Academy (<a href="http://www.internetjurisdiction.net" target="_blank">www.internetjurisdiction.net</a>)</div>
<div>Member, ICANN Board of Directors <br>
Tel : <a href="tel:%2B33%20%280%296%2011%2088%2033%2032" value="+33611883332" target="_blank">+33 (0)6 11 88 33 32</a><br>
<br>
"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les
hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry<br>
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting
humans")</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
Univ.-Ass. Mag. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, LL.M. (Harvard)
Institut für Völkerrecht und Internationale Beziehungen
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Universitätsstraße 15/A4, 8010 Graz, Österreich
T | <a href="tel:%2B43%20316%20380%206711" value="+433163806711" target="_blank">+43 316 380 6711</a> (Büro)
M | <a href="tel:%2B43%20676%20701%207175" value="+436767017175" target="_blank">+43 676 701 7175</a> (mobil)
F | <a href="tel:%2B43%20316%20380%209455" value="+433163809455" target="_blank">+43 316 380 9455</a>
E | <a href="mailto:matthias.kettemann@uni-graz.at" target="_blank">matthias.kettemann@uni-graz.at</a>
Blog | <a href="http://internationallawandtheinternet.blogspot.com" target="_blank">internationallawandtheinternet.blogspot.com</a>
--
Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, LL.M. (Harvard)
Institute of International Law and International Relations
University of Graz
Universitätsstraße 15/A4, 8010 Graz, Austria
T | <a href="tel:%2B43%20316%20380%206711" value="+433163806711" target="_blank">+43 316 380 6711</a> (office)
M | <a href="tel:%2B43%20676%20701%207175" value="+436767017175" target="_blank">+43 676 701 7175</a> (mobile)
F | <a href="tel:%2B43%20316%20380%209455" value="+433163809455" target="_blank">+43 316 380 9455</a>
E | <a href="mailto:matthias.kettemann@uni-graz.at" target="_blank">matthias.kettemann@uni-graz.at</a>
Blog | <a href="http://internationallawandtheinternet.blogspot.com" target="_blank">internationallawandtheinternet.blogspot.com</a></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>____________________<br>Bertrand de La Chapelle<div>Internet & Jurisdiction Project Director, International Diplomatic Academy (<a href="http://www.internetjurisdiction.net" target="_blank">www.internetjurisdiction.net</a>)</div>
<div>Member, ICANN Board of Directors <br>Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32<br><br>"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry<br>("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")</div>
<br>
</div>