<div>Bertrand, thank you for your clarifications. Hopefully, responsible statists will follow that lead.</div><div><br></div>Good points, Alejandro.<div>That was exactly the scope of my question. Several precedents dealt with by international courts deal with the difficulties of attributions in cases of piracy, genocide and crimes against humanity, etc. The wars in the former Yugoslavia are full of examples of groups displaying elements of government authority in their criminal/unlawful actions. It seems to me that in "cyberstuff" it might be even easier to create fog around responsibility. And what has been produced within the scope of NATO seems to reinforce traditional definitions such as the applicability of article 51 of the UN Charter for assessing legality/illegality of self-defense in case of transboundary harm caused "by one State to another State."</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div>Diego<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:apisan@unam.mx" target="_blank">apisan@unam.mx</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div style="direction:ltr;font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">
Bertrand,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>would national law be enough to prevent country A's government from looking the other way when people under its jurisdiction attacks assets in country B? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What if they mask them by obfuscation or spoof them to appear as being based in country(ies) C, D, etc.? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Plenty of literature already on all this. What in your view is the way this will evolve?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yours,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Alejandro Pisanty</div>
<div><br>
<div><br>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px">
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New">
</font></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New">!
!! !!! !!!!</font></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:13px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"></span></span><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New">NEW
PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO</font></span></span></div>
<p><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New"></font></span></span> </p>
<p><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New"><a href="tel:%2B52-1-5541444475" value="+5215541444475" target="_blank">+52-1-5541444475</a>
FROM ABROAD </font></span></span></p>
<p><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New"><a href="tel:%2B525541444475" value="+525541444475" target="_blank">+525541444475</a>
DESDE MÉXICO </font></span></span></p>
<p><span style="border-collapse:separate;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font:medium 'Times New Roman';text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="Courier New">SMS
<a href="tel:%2B525541444475" value="+525541444475" target="_blank">+525541444475</a> <br>
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty<br>
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico<br>
<br>
Blog: <a href="http://pisanty.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://pisanty.blogspot.com</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty</a><br>
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614</a><br>
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/apisanty" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/apisanty</a><br>
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, <a href="http://www.isoc.org" target="_blank">http://www.isoc.org</a><br>
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . </font></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Times New Roman">
<hr>
<div style="direction:ltr"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000"><b>Desde:</b> <a href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a> [<a href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>] en nombre de Bertrand de La Chapelle [<a href="mailto:bdelachapelle@gmail.com" target="_blank">bdelachapelle@gmail.com</a>]<br>
<b>Enviado el:</b> viernes, 07 de diciembre de 2012 10:44<br>
<b>Hasta:</b> Diego Rafael Canabarro<br>
<b>CC:</b> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>; Jovan Kurbalija; irp; McTim<br>
<b>Asunto:</b> Re: [governance] Sovereignty and the Geography of Cyberspace<br>
</font><br>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<div></div>
<div>Dear Diego,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>You wrote: </div>
<div><i>how do we deal with attribution in cases in which it is almost impossible to determine, inter alias, the existence of elements of governmental authority; the direction and control by a State. How to draw the line between State and non state action?</i><br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>You are right, this is a difficult issue. But some situations can probably be handled more easily than others and we could focus on these. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The first instance of application of this principle would, I believe, be in the course of the
<b>development of new national legislations</b>. For the moment, nothing requires to take into account potential impact outside of the frontiers. One could envisage the obligation of an impact study, a call for public comments, etc... </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As a matter of fact, during the workshop we organized in Baku on the Geography of Cyberspace, Marietje Schaake, from the European Parliament, remarked that this is what happens in her work: she receives comments from people outside of europe on draft legislation
in the EP. She said that parliamentarians now have global constituents. Likewise, she and other european parliamentarians wrote to the US congress regarding the SOPA/PIPA debate. And the international campaign against these draft legislations was an illustration
of a grassroots input in a national process because of its potential transboundary impact. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Actually, the recommendation of the Council of Europe explicitly says : </div>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px">
<div>
<p style><u><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i>1.2. Co-operation</i></font></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p style><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i>States should co-operate in good faith with each other and with relevant stakeholders at all stages of
<b>development and implementation </b>of Internet-related public policies to avoid any adverse transboundary impact on access to and use of the Internet. (emphasis added)</i></font></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A second aspect is related to <b>individual decisions</b>. The rojadirecta case is an illustration. In such situations, there are two possible avenues: one is the application of the notion of "comity" advocated by Thomas Schultz, that would require courts
in one country to take into account to a certain extent the laws of the other jurisdiction involved; another one would be the creation of specific processes to detect/document such situations and instances for dealing with them. This is a long shot, but maybe
not unrealistic. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In particular, specific regimes could be developed covering states actions towards respectively: the DNS layer operators (registries, registrars, RIRs, etc...) and the major platforms related to the applications (and content) layer. This can be part of
due process requirements. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Finally, the IGF workshop also introduced a <b>distinction between voluntary and involuntary transborder impact</b>. There are cases where the intention is clearly to extend the sovereign powers on other territories. But there are also cases of unintended
consequences, such as when the filtering of content in India applied downstream to Omanis because of the peering arrangements between operators. Such cases may be easier to handle, provided there are cooperation mechanisms in place.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bertrand</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Diego Rafael Canabarro <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:diegocanabarro@gmail.com" target="_blank">diegocanabarro@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Your text, Bertrand, which I accessed because of Everton Lucero's post on facebook (thanks, Everton!) is awesome. Your e-mail reinforced a doubt I had after reading your post:
<i>"This is why the drafting group carefully restricted this principle to the action of states themselves."</i>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'm pretty sure that you all considered the Draft Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts adopted by the International Law Commission in 2001. That's exactly my concern: how do we deal with attribution in cases in which it is
almost impossible to determine, inter alias, the existence of elements of governmental authority; the direction and control by a State. How to draw the line between State and non state action?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div>Diego Canabarro</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Bertrand de La Chapelle
<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bdelachapelle@gmail.com" target="_blank">bdelachapelle@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jovan has launched in the post below a very interesting topic that moved a bit out of McTim's initial call for buying a boat. Hence the separate thread (also shared on the IRP list). </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I have just posted a piece on CircleID on the topic of "<a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20121204_sovereignty_and_the_geography_of_cyberspace/" target="_blank">Sovereignty and the Geography of Cyberspace</a>" that touches upon some of Jovan's comments.
It follows a workshop that the <a href="http://www.internetjurisdiction.net" target="_blank">
Internet & Jurisdiction Project</a> organized at the Baku IGF. I hope you'll find it interesting. Comments welcome.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>One point I would like to highlight is that the Council of Europe in a <a href="https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1835707" target="_blank">
recommendation of its Council of Ministers</a> in September 2011, established the principle of responsibility of States for transboundary harm:</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px">
<div>
<p><u><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i>1.1. No harm</i></font></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i>1.1.1. States have the responsibility to ensure, in compliance with the standards recognised in international human rights law and with the principles of international law, that their actions do not have an adverse
transboundary impact on access to and use of the Internet.</i></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><i>1.1.2. This should include, in particular, the responsibility to ensure that their actions within their jurisdictions do not illegitimately interfere with access to content outside their territorial boundaries
or negatively impact the transboundary flow of Internet traffic.</i></font></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>During very interesting workshops in Baku, including one from the Council of europe, this principle was explored further. Jovan rightly posits that if it means a responsibility to prevent any action on their territory that would create transboundary harm,
it could be misused to justify surveillance and censorship. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is why the drafting group (Wolfgang, Rolf Weber, Michael Yakushev, Christian Singer and myself) carefully restricted this principle to the action of states themselves. Responsibility for transboundary harm should be a natural corollary of the exercise
of sovereignty. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Unrestrained exercise of sovereignty can lead to extraterritorial impact, as the rojadirecta case has shown. And this would favor the governments having major operators on their soil. Sovereignty can kill sovereignty. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is abroad discussion, but this notion - that emerged from a discussion four years ago at the first EuroDIG in Strasbourg - may be one of the new principles needed for the cross-border infrastructure that the Internet is. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bertrand</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Jovan Kurbalija <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:jovank@diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">jovank@diplomacy.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">Well, we have innovation! With the IGF in Bali, and ICANN on a cruise ship, we may have 'beach or floating governance'. Internet governance could be fun!<br>
<div><br>
I like the metaphor of the ship since it implies our common destiny. We are all passengers of ICANNia or ITUnia or...<b>?<font color="#cc0000"></font></b> Metaphors are also useful to remove our tunnel vision and make us think more creatively. In another
metaphor, I hope that Internetistan will resist Absurdistan (<a href="http://diplo.smugmug.com/ILLUSTRATIONS/Posters-1/4464706_T4FW6r#%21i=1104113260&k=2GsD8hV&lb=1&s=A" target="_blank">here is the map of this fast-growing country</a>).
<br>
<br>
But back to the current reality. Unfortunately, the ICANN cruise ship won't solve the problem of internationalisation. 'Open sea' refers only to freedom of navigation. It does not deal with the status of the ship. All relations on the ship are regulated by
the national law of the ship's flag. ICANNia has to be registered somewhere. One solution could be a flag of convenience such as Liberia or Panama. What happens on the ICANNia is regulated by national law, with no major differences from any other land-based
entity (company, organisation). Yes, ICANNia can sail in whatever direction it wants to sail, but the decision must be made by the captain according to the rules of the flag's state. Extrapolating from the role of the captain on the ship, the ICANNia would
look like military unit. The cruise ship metaphor gets even more interesting when we consider different classes of cabins, rescue operations, etc.<br>
<br>
These thoughts have taken me back to Hugo Grotius's book <i>Mare Liberum</i> that established the "open sea" concept four centuries ago as opposed to the idea of a
<i>Mare Nostrum</i>. <font color="#cc0000"><b> </b></font>His relevance for our time is sobering. If we replace 'sea' with 'Internet' we could have the next book on the Internet. Grotius was a very interesting personality.<font color="#cc0000"><b> </b></font>
Besides being one of the first international lawyers, he was one of the founders of the 'natural law' school of thought. In addition, he wrote a lot about social contract (before Rousseau, Locke, and others). As a matter of fact, his social contract theory
could be applicable to the Internet. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
When it comes to the concept of open sea, Grotius had an interesting interplay with the political masters of his era. He believed in open sea, but Dutch and British authorities quickly realised the usefulness of his doctrine. They had the biggest fleets and
had ambitions to develop trade and colonial empires. Grotius provided them with the necessary doctrine or 'political software'. However, Grotius always argued that 'open sea' needs rules and principles in order to be 'open'. Although it was counter-intuitive
to the leaders of two growing maritime powers, he managed to convince them that it was in their best interest to 'tame' their comparative powers and ensure the sustainability of their empires beyond the 17th century. Everything else has written the history,
which proved Grotius right. We can draw many parallels, with the necessary caution that historical analogies should be handled with care.
<br>
<br>
While we are waiting for a new Grotius (or Godot), we should review how we debate Internet governance issues. Grotius was a great scholar who mastered the existing rules before he started changing them. We, on the other hand, use well-defined and developed
concepts in a relaxed way. A few examples...<br>
<br>
As we saw, the frequently used metaphor of the open sea does not translate to an open Internet. In many respects, it can lead in the opposite direction (Internet Nostrum).
<br>
<br>
Another example is the role of states' responsibility in the Internet era. This is a well-defined concept in international law. If we want states to be responsible for whatever is originating in their territories (e.g. cyber-attacks, botnets), we have to
give them the tools to ensure their responsibility (mainly state control, regulation, and surveillance). Most writings on state responsibility start from the opposite assumption, i.e. the limited role of the state. With all the creativity and imagination in
the world, we still cannot have it both ways. <br>
<br>
The most topical example of the need for evidence-based policy is the case of the Red Cross name/emblem at ICANN. There are very clear rules for the protection of the Red Cross name/emblem that were adopted some 100 years ago and have been followed, without
reservation, on national and international levels. ICANN was right in protecting the Red Cross name but made the mistake of putting it together with organisations that do not enjoy the same status (the International Olympic Committee).
<br>
<br>
Even if we want to change the rules in order to adjust to the specificities of the Internet era (if any), we have first to master them. I see here an important role for academic and civil society communities. If we had advised ICANN to evaluate the Red Cross
and IOC submissions separately, we could have avoided a lot of policy confusion and wasted time.
<br>
<br>
The GIGANET might consider the evidence-based policy research as the key theme for the next meeting?<br>
<br>
Regards, Jovan <br>
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
<div>On 12/6/12 3:31 PM, McTim wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">All,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If domiciling ICANN in a nation state is problematic, perhaps ICANN could buy this cruise ship as a HQ:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="http://cruiseship.homestead.com/Cruise-Ship.html" target="_blank">http://cruiseship.homestead.com/Cruise-Ship.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It would help solve the problem of internationalisation, be a permanent host for ICANN meetings (2450 berths....saving hotel costs for all) and generate revenue intersessionally. It's a 3-fer, plus it's a snip @~ 300 million USD!!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
McTim<br>
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div>-- <br>
<div>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><b><span>Jovan <span>Kurbalija</span>, PhD<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><span>Director, <span>DiploFoundation</span></span><span><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><span lang="FR-CH">Rue de Lausanne 56 </span><b><span lang="FR-CH">|
</span></b><span lang="FR-CH">1202 Geneva</span><span lang="FR-CH"> </span><b><span lang="FR-CH">|</span></b><b><span lang="FR-CH">
</span></b><span lang="FR-CH">Switzerland</span><span><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><span><b><span>Tel.</span></b><span> </span><span lang="FR-CH"><a href="tel:%2B41%20%280%29%2022%207410435" value="+41227410435" target="_blank">+41 (0) 22 7410435</a>
</span><b><span lang="FR-CH">| </span></b><b><span lang="FR-CH">Mobile.</span></b></span><span lang="FR-CH"> <a href="tel:%2B41%20%280%29%20797884226" value="+41797884226" target="_blank">+41 (0) 797884226</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><b><span>Email: </span></b><span lang="FR-CH"><a href="mailto:jovank@diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">jovank@diplomacy.edu</a></span><span> </span><span>
</span><b><span lang="FR-CH">| </span></b><b><span lang="FR-CH">Twitter:</span></b><span lang="FR-CH"> @jovankurbalija</span><span> </span><span><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p style="text-autospace:none"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p><b><span lang="FR-CH" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(31,73,125)">The latest from Diplo:</span></b><span lang="FR-CH" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial"><a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/currently" target="_blank">today – this week – this month</a>
<b><span style="color:red">l</span></b> <a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/conferences/innovation" target="_blank">
Conference on Innovation in Diplomacy (Malta, 19-20 November 2012)</a> <b><span style="color:red">l</span>
</b><a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses" target="_blank">new online courses</a></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">
http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
____________________<br>
Bertrand de La Chapelle
<div>Internet & Jurisdiction Project Director, International Diplomatic Academy (<a href="http://www.internetjurisdiction.net" target="_blank">www.internetjurisdiction.net</a>)</div>
<div>Member, ICANN Board of Directors <br>
Tel : <a href="tel:%2B33%20%280%296%2011%2088%2033%2032" value="+33611883332" target="_blank">
+33 (0)6 11 88 33 32</a><br>
<br>
"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry<br>
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")</div>
<br>
</font></span></div>
</div>
<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">
http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
</div>
</div>
Diego R. Canabarro
<div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="vertical-align:top;text-align:left"><a href="http://lattes.cnpq.br/4980585945314597" target="_blank">http://lattes.cnpq.br/4980585945314597</a></span> </font><br>
<br>
--<br>
diego.canabarro [at] <a href="http://ufrgs.br" target="_blank">ufrgs.br</a></div>
<div>diego [at] <a href="http://pubpol.umass.edu" target="_blank">pubpol.umass.edu</a><br>
MSN: diegocanabarro [at] <a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a><br>
Skype: diegocanabarro<br>
Cell # <a href="tel:%2B55-51-9244-3425" value="+555192443425" target="_blank">+55-51-9244-3425</a> (Brasil) /
<a href="tel:%2B1-413-362-0133" value="+14133620133" target="_blank">+1-413-362-0133</a> (USA)<br>
--<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
____________________<br>
Bertrand de La Chapelle
<div>Internet & Jurisdiction Project Director, International Diplomatic Academy (<a href="http://www.internetjurisdiction.net" target="_blank">www.internetjurisdiction.net</a>)</div>
<div>Member, ICANN Board of Directors <br>
Tel : <a href="tel:%2B33%20%280%296%2011%2088%2033%2032" value="+33611883332" target="_blank">+33 (0)6 11 88 33 32</a><br>
<br>
"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry<br>
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Diego R. Canabarro<div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="vertical-align:top;text-align:left"><a href="http://lattes.cnpq.br/4980585945314597" target="_blank">http://lattes.cnpq.br/4980585945314597</a></span> </font><br>
<br>--<br>diego.canabarro [at] <a href="http://ufrgs.br" target="_blank">ufrgs.br</a></div><div>diego [at] <a href="http://pubpol.umass.edu" target="_blank">pubpol.umass.edu</a><br>MSN: diegocanabarro [at] <a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a><br>
Skype: diegocanabarro<br>Cell # +55-51-9244-3425 (Brasil) / +1-413-362-0133 (USA)<br>--<br></div><br>
</div>