<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">
      <p>Le 03/12/12 15:36, Milton L Mueller a écrit :<br>
      </p>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:855077AC3D7A7147A7570370CA01ECD2289FDB@SUEX10-mbx-10.ad.syr.edu"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31,
          73, 125);">Suresh, I think the debates are related. Now it is
          not just ETNO and the old telecom incumbents who want to grab
          a share of the new wealth being generated by over the top
          internet services, it's national governments as well.  <br>
        </span></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><small><small><small><small><tt><big><big><span id="result_box"
                      class="" lang="en"><span class="hps">The wealth
                        created by</span> <span class="hps">the</span>
                      <span class="hps">Internet companies</span> <span
                        class="hps">that do</span> <span class="hps">not
                        pay taxes</span> <span class="hps">is</span> <span
                        class="hps">a catch,</span> <span class="hps">the
                        result of</span> <span class="hps">cuckoo</span>
                      <span class="hps">economy models</span><span>.</span></span></big></big></tt></small></small></small></small></p>
    <p><small><small><small><small><tt><big><big><span id="result_box"
                      class="" lang="en"><span class="hps">They do not
                        pay</span> neither <span class="hps">for</span>
                      <span class="hps"></span><span class="hps">telecom
                      </span></span></big></big></tt><tt><big><big><span
                      id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span
                        class="hps"><span id="result_box" class=""
                          lang="en"><span class="hps">infrastructures</span></span>,</span>
                      <span class="hps">nor for others</span><span>:
                        roads</span><span>, schools,</span> <span
                        class="hps">justice,</span> <span class="hps">military,
                        police</span><span class="">, customs,</span> <span
                        class="hps">safety organizations</span><span>:
                        everything</span> <span class="hps">that enable
                        firms</span><span class="hps"> to develop their</span>
                      <span class="hps">business</span> <span
                        class="hps">and do commerce</span> <span
                        class="hps">in</span> <span class="hps">peace.</span></span></big></big></tt></small></small></small></small></p>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:855077AC3D7A7147A7570370CA01ECD2289FDB@SUEX10-mbx-10.ad.syr.edu"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31,
          73, 125);">So what is new here? Governments want to tax
          whatever they can for their own (political) self-interest,
          while businesses (and most citizens) want to reduce their
          taxes as much as possible. <br>
        </span></p>
    </blockquote>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
    <p><big><big><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span
              title="Vous présumez que les citoyens pensent comme les
              entreprises.">You assume that people think like
              businesses, while</span><span title="Or les citoyens
              pensent davantage comme les politiques pour qui ils
              votent."> people feel more like who they vote for.</span></span></big></big></p>
    <p><big><big><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span
              title="Or les citoyens pensent davantage comme les
              politiques pour qui ils votent."></span><span title="Chez
              vous, je ne sais pas, mais chez nous, en France et en
              Europe, les politiques utilisent leur budget pour des
              programmes dans l'intérêt des coitoyens.">In your country,
              I don't know the case - but here in France and Europe,
              politicians are supposed to use their budgets for programs
              in the interest of the citizens. </span><span
              title="S'ils prenaient l'argent pour eux, c'est la prison
              directe.">If they took the money for them, it's jail
              directly.</span></span></big></big></p>
    <p><big><big>We can discute what are the best political programmes.
          But that's precisely what is democracy.</big></big></p>
    <p><big><big>Democracy has a cost, that must be covered by special
          contributions named taxes.<br>
        </big></big></p>
    <p><big><big>No tax, no democracy.<br>
        </big></big></p>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:855077AC3D7A7147A7570370CA01ECD2289FDB@SUEX10-mbx-10.ad.syr.edu"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31,
          73, 125);"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
      <p>
      </p>
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31,
          73, 125);">What's interesting is  how un-selfconsciously the
          Dominiques and Gursteins of the world assume that more
          taxation = always better for society. Not a shred of critical
          perspective on the governments' demands for more revenue. And
          as usual, Gurstein approaches the debate by attaching labels
          ("Reaganomics") rather than mounting a serious argument.  <br>
        </span></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><big><big>All the Dominiques and Mickaels of the world answer
          you: <br>
          the contrary of tax cut or fiscal paradise is <font
            face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">not</font></big> <small><small><small><small><small>"</small></small></small></small></small></big><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><span
                      style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><small><font
                          color="#000000"><big>"more taxation is always
                            better for society". <br>
                            And the contrary of "more tax" is not "no
                            tax at all"</big></font></small><font
                        color="#000000"><big>.</big></font></span></small></small></small></small></small></small></small></p>
    <p><small><small><small><small><span style="font-size: 11pt; color:
                rgb(31, 73, 125);"><font color="#000000"><big>All the
                    Miltons of the world know it also. <br>
                    Except you, perhaps. That's why you are a unique
                    person, my dear Milton!<br>
                    The unique one with some selfconsciousness and
                    intelligence...</big></font></span></small></small></small></small></p>
    <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><font
          color="#000000"><big>Kind regards, Dominique<br>
            <br>
          </big></font></span></p>
    <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
    <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
    <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:855077AC3D7A7147A7570370CA01ECD2289FDB@SUEX10-mbx-10.ad.syr.edu"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31,
          73, 125);"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
      <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span>
        <span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Do
          governments have some kind of right to these revenues? If so,
          what is the basis? If so, what is a reasonable rate of
          taxation? How are these revenues used? How do they benefit the
          internet users who generated them? Might be good for you all
          to contemplate the answers to some of those questions. The
          implication of your statement is that more taxation is always
          better. You don’t have to be a supply-side economist to
          understand that taxation can reach a point of diminishing
          returns and that it can destroy economic activity as well as
          help sustain social services. Please, a more intelligent
          perspective on this…
        </span></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p class="moz-signature" cols="72"><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>