<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm"><big><font face="Times New Roman,
serif"><font size="3"><big><span lang="en-US"><span
style="font-weight: normal">Hi All<br>
</span></span></big></font></font></big></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm"><big><font face="Times New Roman,
serif"><font size="3"><big><span lang="en-US"><span
style="font-weight: normal">Sorry for the delay in
posting my promised more detailed response to the
Daily Mail article
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2220692/How-India-helped-bunch-bureaucrats-custodians-Internet.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2220692/How-India-helped-bunch-bureaucrats-custodians-Internet.html</a>
. I just has to wait for the weekend to get some time
for it. <br>
</span></span></big></font></font></big></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm"><big><font face="Times New Roman,
serif"><font size="3"><big><span lang="en-US"><span
style="font-weight: normal">The referred article
builds over what has been made out by many actors,
including some on this elist, to look like (1) the
CIRP proposal was pulled out from nowhere by a set of
evil minded actors and suddenly inflicted upon the
world and (2) that CIRP is a proposal as devious as no
other, which is out to put the Internet under
governmental CONTROL. Both assertions are blatant
propaganda and can easily be disproved by facts, of
course, only to the extent facts matter in the middle
of solid, well resourced, propaganda.... <br>
<br>
I sought to address the first of these issues in this
email and the second one in my next email. I thought
it would be 7-8 points but writing alternative
history, against the dominant, 'normally' accepted and
solidly entrenched versions, I realised is not at all
an easy task. And so it is considerably longer than
7-8 points, whereby I considered it advisable to put
it as an enclosed document. <br>
</span></span></big></font></font></big></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm"><big><font face="Times New Roman,
serif"><font size="3"><big><span lang="en-US"><span
style="font-weight: normal">However, more that the
history or the process of it, I am interested in
discussing what CIRP really is, and the hypocrisy of
its major detractors as they side with the current
dominant mechanism of how the Internet is being shaped
as per the interests of the powerful. Vide the
enclosed, I have answered the questions that some had
asked me on this list. I hope they will be as willing
to answer my forthcoming questions (also asked often
earlier) on substantive aspects of efforts at
democratising global Internet policy making versus the
current mechanisms that simply add power to the
already most powerful. About that shortly....<br>
</span></span></big></font></font></big></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm"><big><font face="Times New Roman,
serif"><font size="3"><big><span lang="en-US"><span
style="font-weight: normal">parminder <br>
</span></span></big></font></font></big></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm"><big><font face="Times New Roman,
serif"><font size="3"><big><span lang="en-US"><span
style="font-weight: normal"><br>
. <br>
</span></span></big></font></font></big></p>
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="LibreOffice 3.5 (Linux)">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin: 2cm }
P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm }
A:link { so-language: zxx }
-->
</style>
</body>
</html>