<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">Parminder,<br/><br/>1. This will help you (re "not understanding really well" re IXP situation):<br/><br/>http://oecdinsights.org/2012/10/22/internet-traffic-exchange-2-billion-users-and-its-done-on-a-handshake/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=internet-traffic-exchange-2-billion-users-and-its-done-on-a-handshake<br/><br/>Includes reference to silent good work of engineers I mentioned previously. <br/><br/>2. Re traffic going out of India and back, measure, measure! Traceroute is your friend. Use the publicly available Web-based ones as well. <br/><br/>Yours,<br/><br/>Alejandro Pisanty<div>Enviado desde/Sent from BlackBerry® <br/><br/>! !! !!! !!!!<br/>NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NUMERO DE TELEFONO<br/>+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD<br/>+525541444475 DESDE MEXICO<br/>SMS +525541444475<br/> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty<br/>UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico<br/>Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com<br/>LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty<br/>Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614<br/>Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty<br/>---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org<br/>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</div><hr/><div><b>From: </b> parminder <parminder@itforchange.net>
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:52:07 +0530</div><div><b>To: </b><apisan@unam.mx></div><div><b>Cc: </b><governance@lists.igcaucus.org></div><div><b>Subject: </b>Re: [governance] Africa to launch own Internet exchange point</div><div><br/></div>
<font face="Verdana"><br>
Dear Alejandro,<br>
<br>
Thanks for your response. <br>
<br>
No, I have not been talking to the ISPs in India, and do not
understand the situation really well. However I have heard remarks
that, even after many years of setting up of India's national
Internet exchange NIXI, a very larger part of the domestic traffic
still gets routed from outside back to India.<br>
<br>
It appears to me that compulsory exchange of traffic, on open
peering basis, with zero settlement charges, would be good for an
open and competitive Internet ecology. I read that NIXI in India
has some settlement arrangement based on requester pays. Possibly,
some kind of hybrid model which takes into account 'an overall
framework' of actual cost and benefit accruing among different
sized ISPs may be possible to evolve. (Of course, any kind of
sender pays system is taboo, as it contorts the very structure of
the Internet.)<br>
<br>
I do think that some amount of public interest regulation is
required</font><font face="Verdana"> at the transport layer of the
Internet</font><font face="Verdana"> to keep the Internet as a
really open system, as was in the case with telephone traffic
exchanged at PSTNs, although the dynamics and thus the needed
remedies in the case of the Internet are different. The content/
applications layer however is a completely different ball game and
does not require similar 'public utility' kind of regulatory
attention. (There can however be issues when some application
providers becomes the monopoly provider of some basic digital
enablement or facilities. However the point of departure for the
required legal/ regulatory attention in such cases would be
different - for instance, like the current US FTC investigations
into Google's search engine practices.)<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 20 October 2012 05:41 PM,
Alejandro Pisanty wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:80433240-1350735178-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-460218140-@b26.c13.bise6.blackberry" type="cite">
Parminder,<br>
<br>
Market power and large asymmetries in traffic are indeed a serious
factor in this. Lots of good bilateral agreements between ISPs and
good engineering go far in optimizing traffic in absence of an
IXP. Forcing interconnection by law or government action seems
tempting but bites back hard; need to collect case studies for
further analysis. Are you talking to ISPs close by or do you have
a study for India?<br>
<br>
Yours,<br>
<br>
Alejandro Pisanty
<div>Enviado desde/Sent from BlackBerry® <br>
<br>
! !! !!! !!!!<br>
NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NUMERO DE TELEFONO<br>
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD<br>
+525541444475 DESDE MEXICO<br>
SMS +525541444475<br>
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty<br>
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico<br>
Blog: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pisanty.blogspot.com">http://pisanty.blogspot.com</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty">http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty</a><br>
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614">http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614</a><br>
Twitter: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/apisanty">http://twitter.com/apisanty</a><br>
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.isoc.org">http://www.isoc.org</a><br>
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</div>
<hr>
<div><b>From: </b> parminder <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net"><parminder@itforchange.net></a>
</div>
<div><b>Sender: </b>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org"><governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org></a>
</div>
<div><b>Date: </b>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:05:22 +0530</div>
<div><b>To: </b><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"><governance@lists.igcaucus.org></a></div>
<div><b>ReplyTo: </b> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"><governance@lists.igcaucus.org></a>,
parminder <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net"><parminder@itforchange.net></a>
</div>
<div><b>Subject: </b>Re: [governance] Africa to launch own
Internet exchange point</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<font face="Verdana"><br>
Isnt one (biggest?) of the reasons of failures of most public
interest IXPs is that there is no regulatory mechanism to ensure
that traffic is exchanged at given national or regional
exchanges, like there is for telephones. For which reason big
ISPs/ carriers simply refuse to exchange traffic with the
smaller ones in order to keep the market power advantage and not
allow a level playing field. Just curious to know.<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Friday 19 October 2012 11:38 PM,
Mawaki Chango wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CACTo+v-29UGxCtC+bha_oEaOYXCjP7JDc1UeEQL=+1Q+oVxpRQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Thank you, Dawit, for this clarification that helps find answers to my
questions.
Mawaki
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Dawit Bekele <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bekele@isoc.org"><bekele@isoc.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi all,
As the implementer of the African Union's African Internet Exchange System
(AXIS) project under which this workshop in Gambia is organized, I would
like to give some information on this particular workshop and the AXIS
project in general. The AXIS project is an African Union project that aims
at promoting the development of IXPs around Africa. The first phase of the
project consists of organizing IXP Best practice workshops in 30 African
countries where there is no IXP followed by technical workshops in these
same countries. The Internet Society has been selected by the African
Regional Bureau to implement this phase in a period of 2 years. I have
attached a press release concerning AXIS (sorry the website is not ready
yet).
The African Union and indeed the Internet society are conscious that setting
up an IXP is not an end by itself and there are many IXPs that never took
off from the ground. This is why the Best Practice workshops will discuss
about what works and what doesn't work based one the experiences of IXPs in
Africa ad around the world. The facilitators that we send to these workshops
have practical experience in developing IXPs and can advise the stakeholders
invited at the workshops on the way forward.
As David rightly mentioned the training is technology neutral. Every country
follows its own pace in developing the IXPs. The Internet Society and the
African Union can only advise the stakeholders on the steps to take. We
organized these workshops in four countries in the last two months: Burkina
Faso, Burundi, Senegal and Gambia. We will organize the following workshops
in the coming two months:
Namibia 23 - 25 October
Guinea 30 Oct- Nov 1
Niger 6-8 November
Benin 13-15 November
Most countries where we have organized the workshops have adopted a clear
plan to set-up an IXP within a few months and established task forces to
that effect, as in the case of the Gambia.
Finally, AXIS is not an isolated program but part of a holistic ICT
development plan for Africa (African Regional Action Plan on the Knowledge
Economy -ARAPKE). AXIS is one of the 11 flagship projects of the ARAPKE
(attached description).
Best regards,
Dawit Bekele
Director, African Regional Bureau
Internet Society
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-----Original Message-----
From: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a> [<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:governance">mailto:governance</a>-
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:request@lists.igcaucus.org">request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>] On Behalf Of Mawaki Chango
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 1:33 PM
To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>; Jean-Louis FULLSACK
Subject: Re: [governance] Africa to launch own Internet exchange point
Thanks, Jean-Louis! That was part of the reason why I was surprised an IXP
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">in
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Africa would make such headline still today, and why I was wondering about
any integrated strategy from the part of AU. Without a vision that takes
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">into
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">account elements you have outlined, it's hard to appreciate real, long
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">term
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">progress.
In your view, what are we missing right now in order to develop a
"consistent, survivable network" keeping in mind that Africa is a huge
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">place
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">where policy is mainly made through government planning, etc.?
Where does it make more sense to start from --both technically and
strategically-- in order to realize that "minimum of consistency"
which can make any subsequent efforts more efficient? I think any long
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">term
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">advocacy effort in Africa should itself be led by a vision of this kind,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">where
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">policy goals are well informed by technology capabilities and best
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">practices,
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">and then try to win over policy-makers to it.
A whole other challenge is, of course, to get policy-makers and any
incumbent stakeholders to embrace the notion (and reality) of creative
destruction, which has never been a given in any place at any era.
Here I can only think of CS using a range of strategies and tactics and
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">sharing
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">information globally in order to help shape the events and try to shift
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">the
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">power dynamics.
Best,
Mawaki
otherwise Africa Internet Policy coordinator at APC, the one and only
Association for Progressive Communications :)
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Jean-Louis FULLSACK
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jlfullsack@orange.fr"><jlfullsack@orange.fr></a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Dear members of the list
The basic issue in Africa isn't the lack of IXPs, since there are
around thirty ones. Of course this number is to be extended and
spatial distribution is to be improved, and the Gambia IXP is a step
in this direction.
But there is a lack of appropriate networks at the national, regional
and continental level. In most cases there are a more or less
continuous series of optical fiber or microwave routes but not a
consistent, survivable network. This strongly limits the very
functions of the IXPs i.e. switching, routing and thereby maintaining
IP traffic that is exchanged in specific spaces (country, sub-region,
part of African continent) in their respective limits, saving high
costs of transiting through out-of-Africa Internet nodes and
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">consequently
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">bandwidth waste on international routes.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Finally, there are severe power issues in most countries that limit
seriously the availability of both the IXPs and the interconnecting
network(s).
Of course, some progress has been done for improving this situation
but the
(expensive) efforts lack a minimum of consistency and therefore take
too much time for being efficient. Reponsibility for this
mismanagement is mainly the neoliberal ruling that promotes hard
competition instead of genuine networking, but also the African Union
and the ITU, despite the n°1 and 2 of which are Africans.
Best regards
Jean-Louis Fullsack
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Message du 18/10/12 21:10
De : "David Conrad"
A : <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [governance] Africa to launch own Internet exchange point
Hi Norbert,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Norbert Klein wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I thought it was also interesting that this effort of ISOC is
reported here by Xinhua via the China Daily. Maybe an indication
that the internationally experienced and active hardware supplier
Huawei will help the Banjul efforts, and whoever will by trained
with the experience of ISOC when new IXP will be set up in more
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">places
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">in Africa.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">My understanding is that the training (done by folks from ISOC
partnering with AfriNIC and other Africa-based organizations is
technology neutral. I'm told by one of the folks involved in Gambia
that they expect the IXP to be set up in 6 months or so. As far as I
know, there hasn't been any decision on hardware in the IXP.
Regards,
-drc
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">__________________________________________________________
__
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
To be removed from the list, visit:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a>
For all other list information and functions, see:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a>
Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">__________________________________________________________
__
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
To be removed from the list, visit:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a>
For all other list information and functions, see:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a>
Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>