<br><br>On Monday, September 17, 2012, Ivar A. M. Hartmann wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I don't believe Twitter or any other profit-seeking corporation makes an effort to protect free speech systematically when it threatens their income. Twitter's strategy of making content removals visible is a business (PR) one, not a human rights protection mechanism. <br>
How much transparency is enough transparency is indeed the key question here. This can't be answered in a simple email, but I dare say enough transparency is that which enables full scrutiny of a company or government's actions.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Like this:</div><div><br></div><div><br><a href="http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/">http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Rgds, McTim<span></span></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div>Mct<br><br><br><br><br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>Best,<br>Ivar<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Daniel Kalchev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'daniel@digsys.bg');" target="_blank">daniel@digsys.bg</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
The one about Twitter. <br>
<br>
I can understand Twitter claiming transparency, but can't believe
for a moment they are indeed transparent about it (makes no sense).<br>
<br>
If you are not 100% transparent, because that is simply not
possible, how much is "enough"?<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Daniel</font></span><div><div><br>
<br>
On 17.09.12 15:32, Ivar A. M. Hartmann wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Which of the two statements are you referring to,
Daniel?<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Daniel
Kalchev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'daniel@digsys.bg');" target="_blank">daniel@digsys.bg</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><br>
<br>
On 17.09.12 04:17, Ivar A. M. Hartmann wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
A jail full of dissidents is evidence of repression, but
where's the evidence of thousands of deleted posts and
pictures? Twitter is for the most part alone in trying to
make content removal transparent.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
Why you believe this is the case?<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
</font></span><br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'governance@lists.igcaucus.org');" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote><br><br>-- <br>Cheers,<br><br>McTim<br>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br>