<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Parminder<br>
<br>
One can put is also differently... if it is just US law then it does
have de facto global application... now if these proposals were to
be take seriously... then how would ICANN deal with the issues at
the edges... porn in Saudi, religious and political symbols in
France, sacred issues in India, etc... most international regimes
are adept (if oft inept) at dealing with diversity... do you even
see a trace of this in ICANN (although it is improving) or in the
discourse... <br>
<br>
If difference cannot be dealt with operationally in a sound way
(i.e. deal with national sentiments, cultures, approaches,
alternative conceptions of the good life, etc) then it remains an
American imposition at least at the edges (where it does tend to
count more than other issues).... And it is not just national or
individualistic diversity one is talking about... it is also policy
diversity...<br>
<br>
riaz<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2012/09/11 12:49 PM, parminder
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:504F092B.1090807@itforchange.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<font face="Verdana"><br>
<br>
<big>Hi Lee, <br>
<br>
We live in a world that is made of territorially defined and
bound jurisdictions. Plus, there is some international law/
jurisdiction, albeit rather weak. There are no doubts
exceptions, whereby territorial jurisdictions are able to, in
some way or the other, reach out to other parts of the world.
(This </big></font><font face="Verdana"><big>mostly </big></font><font
face="Verdana"><big>happens on the 'powerful gets his way'
principle, which is not to be recommended.) Admittedly, there
are more such instances in a more connected world today then
ever before, but they still are 'exceptions'. The problem is
that Milton and you are trying to propose a governance system
out of these exceptions. No, it doesn't work that way. We cant
work with exceptions, we have to work with the main system.
And the main system is broken, for which please see below...</big><br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Monday 10 September 2012 02:11 AM,
Lee W McKnight wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:77A59FC9477004489D44DE7FC6840E7B135E25@SUEX10-mbx-08.ad.syr.edu"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<style id="owaParaStyle" type="text/css"></style>
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color:
#000000;font-size: 10pt;">Hey Parminder,<br>
<br>
If Milton's signing off, I'll sign on for one more attempt.<br>
<br>
<span style="background-color: white;">My aim is not to
encourage lawsuits against the hegemon's proxy ICANN - but I
feel them coming on anyway, with the .xxx one just the tip
of the hegemon's melting iceberg. (I'm enjoying this 70s
flashback, don't get to use the word hegemon twice in one
sentence often these days : )<br>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<big>You do agree that there are many lawsuits coming ICANN's way.
Are we prepared for the outcomes of these lawsuits, which are as
inevitable. How long will the US executive be able to put
persuasive pressure on the US judiciary to not do anything that
may rock the boat. I dont think the US judiciary is that
subservient, and</big><big>, sooner or later,</big><big> it will
decisively apply the law. In an email on 27th Aug, </big><big>responding
to my specific poser,</big><big> David Conrad developed the
scenario that may follow an adverse decision in the .xxx case.
It culminated in the 'possibility' of .xxx having to be removed
from the root. Are we prepared for this eventuality. Would the
legitimacy of the system not collapse right away! (I must
mention here that David thought it wont).<br>
<br>
There could be other impacts of an adverse decision in the .xxx
case; ICANN may be directed by the court to review all its
policies and actions vis a vis whatever the court thinks needs
to be done to ensure consistent application of US's anti-trust
(or any other) law. ICANN will </big><big>immediately </big><big>*have*
to do so....<br>
</big><br>
<big>Are you/ we prepared for this very plausible scenario?
Responsible governance systems and its stakeholders do not just
sit around and wait for such a 'very probable' eventuality to
happen. What is our response/ preparation to it? Does this not
suggest that the present system of oversight of, and
jurisdiction application over, ICANN is broken? </big><br>
<big><br>
Your and Milton's response to it seems to be: it does not matter
if ICANN has to do all the above things on directions of a US
court; we will simply tell all the outraged/ protesting people
from other countries that ICANN will also respond *exactly" in
the same manner if a court from their countries (India, Ghana,
Nepa, Indonesia, Brazil etc) were to find faults with ICANN and
propose remedial measures. <i>This will be a patently untrue
statement</i>. I can assure you that no one will buy it. So, I
advice you, please be ready for some other response. </big><br>
<br>
<big>As for your and Milton's claim that if ICANN is subject to
international law, the corresponding immunities that it will get
from national jurisdiction could be a problem. Yes, it could be
a problem for USians, since at present ICANN is subject to their
national law. It is not a such problem to people of other
countries. On the other hand, it should be obvious that any
international law will be framed in a manner that takes as much
account of ICANN functions as possible.<big> </big>Even if
specific legal provisions do not exist in some aspects, the
international system is capable of delivering on basis of
principles of natural justice and other such forms of
jurisprudence. </big><br>
<br>
<big>Thanks, but we can do without US law getting imposed on the
whole world, which, to me, is what your and Milton's critique of
'any' international system/ jurisdiction is all about.</big><br>
<br>
<big>parminder</big><br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:77A59FC9477004489D44DE7FC6840E7B135E25@SUEX10-mbx-08.ad.syr.edu"
type="cite">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color:
#000000;font-size: 10pt;"><span style="background-color:
white;"> <br>
So here's my free legal counsel for you: anyone anywhere can
play.<br>
<br>
Just as there was nothing to prevent Google or Yahoo, or
earlier Compuserve being taken to court in France or Brazil,
or Germany and Italy, and senior executives threatened,
tried, sentenced and/or subject to arrest if they set foot
in those countries - meaning even if they had no staff
there, but just passed through say the Frankfurt airport, or
stopped in Rome for a vacation - so too could ICANN staff
be subject to arrest; and ICANN fined for example, should it
not obey a court order in Pakistan or India or anywhere
else. </span><span style="background-color: white;"><br>
<br>
We can review the specific circumstances in the various
cases I mentioned in passing if you want, but basically the
message is as the Internet and Internet services pervades
more deeply into all nation's daily lives, then we should
not be surprised when ICANN is, eventually, challenged in
various nation's courts. Most readily where the organization
has an establishment, meaning staff as in Brussels and
Australia. But even absent staff presence, I could roll out
100 hypothetical scenarios on how ICANN decisions could be
challenged, in Pakistani or Indian, or Brunei's, really any
nation's legal system.</span><br>
<span style="background-color: white;"><br>
Just cuz it's a non-profit with a SoCal HQ does not mean the
organization is exempt from - any - legal sanction,
anywhere.<br>
<br>
Whether the balance of power over the administration of
changes to the root zone file, and/or the creation of this
or that new gtld, should be a matter of hundreds of national
jurisdictions, or handled through some form of global
collective action, is indeed the question. But while I am
practicing law without a license here, as the saying goes in
US domestic politics, at least I am making reality based
statements. Every single thing ICANN does could be
challenged in any national court. Winning a case, and/or
explaining to a judge or jury why a case was brought, is of
course never a sure thing. But the ability in principle of
Indian courts to rule on cases in which Indian citizens,
businesses, and/or government agencies claim injury, is not
in any way impaired by the location of ICANN's HQ.<br>
<br>
ICANN, on the other hand, if established under international
public or private law, could indeed gain various immunities,
which its actions do not now enjoy. Milton's 100% right to
say careful what we wish for here, since moving to a treaty
or international convention as the source of ICANN's legal
status, could just as easily make ICANN less responsive as
more responsive to national jurisdictions, and individuals.
ANY national jurisdiction. But that is a possibility and not
a certainty, as it would depend on the specifics agreed to
by nations signing onto that hypothetical treaty.<br>
<br>
If you don't believe me, just ask any practicing
international (private) lawyer. I'm guessing her answer
would be another question: how deep are your pockets? : )
But anyone with enough money to make the challenge to for
example - any - gtld string, can follow ICANN procedures, or
they can turn to their own national courts. Although those
courts might find it annoying if they are dragged into the
middle of an arcane dispute if remedies from within the
ICANN system were not exhausted first.<br>
<br>
Unfortunately, like I said some time back, this whole
dialogue has gotten - more or less nowhere - since
apparently it is more fun to flash back to the 80s or
hegemonic 70s than try to make sense of what should be done
next, to align ICANN and other elements of Internet
governance more closely with all of the global communities
that are affected by those decisions.<br>
<br>
Since there has been no new or original suggestions made,
then we do seem to be stuck in a time warp. A domestic US
non-profit corporation, albeit one that strives mightily to
- should I say sucker, or invite? : ) - people from around
the world to do the heavy volunteer lifting to keep the
global net up and operating, is the main game in the global
Internet governance village, still.<br>
<br>
Seeing as apparently noone has a better idea, or has even
concrete suggestions on how to get from here to there, there
being a more globally equitable future, then yeah we are
stuck. Bummer. <br>
<br>
Or maybe, I repeat again, this dialogue, while at times fun,
really suggests it is time to get serious about Norbert's
enhanced cooperation task force idea to figure a way
forward. Since none of us are managing to do any better,
absent that. imho. If we are counting on the ITU to do so
in December....well I got a few virtual bridges for sale
that are more solid. Better to give the (IGF-responsive)
task force idea a shot, I suggest.<br>
<br>
Lee<br>
<br>
</span>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-size: 16px;">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div style="direction: ltr;" id="divRpF808551"><font
color="#000000" face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>]
on behalf of parminder [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, September 09, 2012 2:30 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Milton L Mueller<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [governance] Big Porn v. Big Web
Ruling Could Spell Trouble for ICANN / was Re: new gTLDs<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Thursday 06 September 2012
10:42 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings}
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
@font-face
{font-family:"Courier New \;color\:\#1F497D"}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black}
span.EmailStyle17
{font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D}
.MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in}
-->
BODY {direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;}P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-
co
lor:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollba
r-
arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}BODY {scrollbar-base-color:undefined;scrollbar-highlight-color:undefined;scrollbar-darkshadow-color:undefined;scrollbar-track-color:undefined;scrollbar-arrow-color:undefined}</style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:
rgb(31, 73, 125);">Parminder, your responses are
degenerating beyond the point where it is worth
responding.</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You are just getting desperate, Milton...<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:
rgb(31, 73, 125);">You seem to be more interested
in playing rhetorical games than in reaching
agreement or improving understanding. </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Meaning, rather than simply agreeing with your most
untenable proposition about parity of application of
jurisdiction over ICANN between US and all other 191
states. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:
rgb(31, 73, 125);">I will point out the reasons I
say these things and then suspend any further
communication with you on these issues</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:
rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<blockquote style="margin-top: 5pt; margin-bottom:
5pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span style="">[Milton
L Mueller] Any law from ANY jurisdiction
constraining or dictating ICANN’s action
would have global effect, insofar as the
global Internet relies on ICANN to
administer the DNS.</span></i></b></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Milton, In face of clear facts to the contrary,
you continue to claim that EU's, India's, Ghana's,
all of 192 government's, jurisdictions have
similar implication and impact on ICANN. I dont
think I need to labour to disprove this patently
absurd proposition. <span style="color: rgb(31,
73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Read my sentence,
which is a conditional statement and says that
if "any law from any jurisdiction" </span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">could "constrain or
dictate ICANN's action" it would have global
effect. </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Your above statement - 'If' any law from any jurisdiction
'could' constrain or dictate ICANN's action, it would have
global effect - says nothing at all other that that
'ICANN's actions have global effect', something which no
one disputes. What other meaning does this sentence carry?<br>
<br>
What is under disputation is - laws from '<b><i>which</i></b>'
jurisdiction can constraint or dictate ICANN's '<i><b>global</b></i>'
actions? You say that laws from all 192 country
jurisdictions have the 'same' (or at least similar) effect
as from US's jurisdiction of 'constraining or dictating
ICANN's <i><b>global</b></i> action'. This is what I call
as a <i><b>patently absurd proposition. </b></i><br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73,
125);"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But just to continue with the
present discussion on the .xxx case, even if the
ICM registry was * not* US based, the porn
industry majors could/ would have brought the case
against ICANN for instituting .xxx (since the
registry would of course have serviced domain name
demands from the US among others). ICANN would
still be forced to defend itself in the case, and
if it lost the case to annul or modify .xxx
agreement. <span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">I have asked you two
questions related to this that you have
steadfastly ducked: </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">1) Do you think ICANN
should be immune from antitrust? Yes or no.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Of course ICANN should be subject to all kinds of public
interest laws, as every entity should be - anti-trust, but
also others, like those aimed at preserving and deepening
public domain..... ( thus being prevented from giving off
generic names like school, kid, beauty, cloud etc as
private tlds).<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">2) What stops such a
case from being brought in the EU? ICANN has
offices in Brussels, and its "service" or
operations could be considered global, thus in
the EU. </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
First of all, you are cleverly skipping examples of India,
Ghana and Bangladesh that I used, and only employing EU's
case becuase ICANN has an office there... Your argument
can be challenged simply on this ground, what about the
other countries, especially the developing ones where
ICANN chooses not to have an office. (Equity, Milton,
equity, dont lose sight of this simple democratic value!)<br>
<br>
On the other hand, even if ICANN has a Brussels office,
this fact does not put EU's jurisdiction over ICANN
anywhere close to a similar level to US's. Apart from the
fact that, if the push comes to shove, ICANN can simply
close or shift Brussels office, offshore offices have
often claimed lack of control over and accountability for
parent bodies decisions vis a vis the jurisdictions in
which they are located. (This is well known, but if you
want examples, I can give them.)<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It does not take a political
scientist to understand that the same is not true
vis a vis the jurisdiction of any other of 192
countries. <span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">You have not made any
argument to explain why this is true. You have
merely asserted it. </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
No, I did make a clear argument using the scenario of an
.xxx related case being brought in a Bangladesh court. Pl
see my last email to which you respond. But you completely
ignored that argument. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">The US antitrust case
is in fact no different from an antitrust case
that might be brought in the EU, </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Completely wrong. For such a case brought in the EU, even
if .xxx registry was based in EU, (1) ICANN is not obliged
to defend the case (2) even if .xxx was to lose the case,
it is the registry that will have to renege from the ICANN
agreement, ICANN would have to do 'nothing'. However if
the case is lost in the US, ICANN itself has to undertake
certain actions- and also keep the judicial verdict in
mind for future actions - something which is incongruent
with ICANN's global governance status. That is the point.
<br>
<br>
On the other hand, and I said this in the previous email
as well, which you seem to read selectively, even if .xxx
registry was not in the US, the porn industry could still
have brought the case to a US court against ICANN- .xxx
agreement, which is simply not possible vis a vis any
other country jurisdiction. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">If indeed ICANN were
engaged in restraint of the domain name trade in
conjunction with a EU-based</span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">registry, the effect
would be exactly the same in both cases. ICANN's
status as a California Corp. </span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings;
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="">Ø<span
style="font: 7pt "Times New
Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">makes no difference
here. </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
see above<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:
20.25pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
snip<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:
rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"><span
style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"><span
style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">A</span>nd if
it indeed is already subject to 192 jurisdiction,
even efficiency, since you dont recognise issues
of equity and democracy<span style="color: rgb(31,
73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-right:
0in; margin-bottom: 12pt; margin-left: 20.25pt;
text-indent: -0.25in;"> <span style="font-size:
11pt; font-family: Wingdings; color: rgb(31, 73,
125);"><span style="">Ø<span style="font: 7pt
"Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">You lost me here. I am
the one in favor of democracy (e.g., election of
ICANN board), you are the one in favor of
control by states. </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I am glad to have an elected board if you can assemble the
electorate in a manner that is equitous and then ensure
fair polling. Please tell me your proposal. As for
'control by the states' I am happy to have any kind of
direct democracy not only in IG space but also all other
spaces of global governance (your view on this please).
And till we have it, instead of one country dictating to
the world, representational democracy will do (while all
efforts at national and international level should be kept
up to see that these purported 'representatives' are
indeed democratically so). Imperfect democracy and
representativity cannot be taken as an excuse for
perpetuating hegemony and one-country dictatorship. <br>
<br>
with regards<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt;
border-style: none none none solid; border-color:
-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color
-moz-use-text-color blue; -moz-border-top-colors:
none; -moz-border-right-colors: none;
-moz-border-bottom-colors: none;
-moz-border-left-colors: none; -moz-border-image:
none; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;">
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-right:
0in; margin-bottom: 12pt; margin-left: 20.25pt;
text-indent: -0.25in;"> <span style="font-size:
11pt; font-family:
"Calibri","sans-serif";
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"><br>
<br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>