<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>Hi Guru</div><div><br></div><div>On Aug 30, 2012, at 4:48 AM, Guru गुरु wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Wednesday 29 August 2012 06:52 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Guru<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">"Non-aligned" meant "not aligned with the US/capitalist world nor the Soviet/communist world.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Can you tell me what these countries are "not aligned" with today?<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">--MM<br></blockquote>in my mail:<br><br>and in our 'unipolar' world, </div></blockquote><div><br></div>We must live on different planets. Mine's not even multipolar, it's heteropolar. Power is varyingly dispersed in different policy spaces across a growing range of actors, state and non-state.</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>groups like NAM, G77,<br>IBSA have a role in resisting western (gov + corporate) hegemony... in<br>the efforts to establish a more just world…<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Given that NAM's members include all Reporters Without Borders' Enemies of the Internet and almost all of its Countries Under Surveillance <a href="http://en.rsf.org/beset-by-online-surveillance-and-12-03-2012,42061.html">http://en.rsf.org/beset-by-online-surveillance-and-12-03-2012,42061.html</a> (including India) it will certainly be an interesting development if it begins to play a leading role in efforts to establish a more just world with respect to the issues that are nominally the focus of this list. Issuing a declaration incanting the Peoples Daily of China editorial would not be evidence of movement in that direction.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div><br></div><div>Bill<br><div><br></div></div><br></body></html>