<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">PS. <br>
A right position cannot rise peoples one against another.<br>
We consider also that the American people is in a great danger.<br>
Only look at education and health concerns in the US nowadays.<br>
USA cannot recover by war and domination. That's the lesson of
recent history.<br>
<br>
@+, Dom<br>
<br>
Le 29/08/12 15:22, Dominique Lacroix a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:503E1795.7070706@panamo.eu" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Sorry, a very short and rapid insight, because I'm overbooked these days.
myself I don't like a lot the geo-economied 'South'.
Because a <big><big><b>right</b></big></big> rationale for peace and development could be supported also by Northern and Western organizations. Even by American organizations and famous personnalities.
I should propose for example a Peace Group, because our concern, here in my European group, are:
- the militarization of Internet
- the strenght of quasi-monopoly positions of a group that will create great frustrations in a lot of countries
- the privatization of everything, even words, that lead to war-minded processes.
But still open to other proposals.
@+, best
--
Dominique Lacroix
Société européenne de l'Internet
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ies-france.eu">http://www.ies-france.eu</a>
+33 (0)6 63 24 39 14</pre>
<br>
<br>
Le 29/08/12 14:28, Riaz K Tayob a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:503E0B00.4080401@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Sure there is lots to a definition of a group... except that the
G77 on a daily basis at the UN in New York speaks...<br>
<br>
And claims for legitimacy in the 'Global South' also meet with
the inevitable list of collaborators... so it is not easy, but
in this case definitions can be reduced to mere platitudes...
myself I prefer the unadjectivised 'South'<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2012/08/29 01:36 PM, McTim
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxjSO9ADWt++U5uz30c8fyyGVSe=JoakBSe_QaW_A39XWg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:53 AM,
Guru गुरु <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Guru@itforchange.net" target="_blank">Guru@itforchange.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Some
mails have questioned the notion of a 'global south'...<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
or at least the notion that one person can speak for such
a diverse grouping of folk.... <br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
-- <br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
McTim<br>
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it
is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>