<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 25/08/12 04:53, McTim a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxjCz_5iwpkN-T4p7EkbG2pNmYypH=YkmDz2pqJzitNc=w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote>On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Dominique Lacroix <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dl@panamo.eu" target="_blank">dl@panamo.eu</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
I am not sure the RFCs are matters for a CS group.<br>
</blockquote>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>Since RFCs are written by people working for governments,
industry, CS and Internet End-Users together in a
collaborative, open, transparent manner, I would say that this
is a model of CS cooperation!</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
So let's discuss: I'd like to know what people on this list think
about the Ping software and the round-trip packet loss... ;-)<br>
<br>
It's not a critique of IETF. Every profession creates its own
language, that closes the exchange for others, or makes it difficult
to enter the matters.<br>
If you meant that everybody is able to discuss the RFCs, the
engineers expertise and time would had no value.<br>
<br>
Now, I agree with you. The organization design of several IG
components is an interesting matter for CS.<br>
And precisely, the high expertise of IT companies engineers meets
the great role they have for the society. Lawrence Lessig explained
some times ago.<br>
That's a cognitive paradoxe we have to deal with.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
@+, Dominique<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Dominique Lacroix
Société européenne de l'Internet
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ies-france.eu">http://www.ies-france.eu</a>
+33 (0)6 63 24 39 14</pre>
</body>
</html>