<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:07 AM, William Drake <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" target="_blank">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>></span> wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote">
<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div><snip></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>Got what wrong? I didn't say IT for Change hasn't made any proposals on IG. I said to that if there's this big global coalition of countries/peoples who are stewing over root zone signings, please indicate who they are and how you know, so I understand the basis of your claims; and that if you/they want to make this the priority battle and overcome all the various elements of resistance I noted would have to be overcome, advancing a plausible proposal that would provide assurances to those not already in agreement with you would be a logical first step. </div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>what he said.</div><div><br></div><div>I'd also like you (PJS) to reply to my concerns re: your concrete proposal, specifically, have you asked the 4 RIRs if they want to take on a root-ops role? Where would the money to do this come from?</div>
<div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div> I really don't see why that should agitate you or lead to accusations that I'm issuing untruths about your position (case unproven, BTW), putting down people who may think like you, or turning a blind eye to problems with US policy. Why not respond to what I was saying, rather than to what I wasn't? Do you want to score points against imaginary enemies, or have a conversation about what would be required to effectively promote a change in the model?</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>seemingly the former.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Cheers,<br><br>McTim<br>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br>