<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi Andrea<br><div>
</div>
<br><div><div>On Jun 20, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Andrea Glorioso wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><p><br>
On Jun 19, 2012 8:45 AM, "Norbert Bollow" <<a href="mailto:nb@bollow.ch">nb@bollow.ch</a>> wrote:</p><p>> Hmm... maybe the best available course of action will be to start<br>
> with the ID based process, using it to<br>
> a) create an input document for a WGIG like multistakeholder working<br>
> group with strong governmental participation, and at the same time<br>
> b) build credibility for the proposal to initiate such a WGIG like<br>
> multistakeholder group.<br>
><br>
> Does this sound reasonable?</p><p>Yes. </p></blockquote><br></div><div>I seem to recall that at the CSTD meeting, a number of European governments spoke against launching an enhanced cooperation working group. So I'm just wondering, does the Commission have a different position on the matter, and are you encouraging civil society to spend time on this non-starter in an official capacity? Or is it just that you personally think it'd be a good thing?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div><br></div><div>Bill</div><br></body></html>