<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Sorry, I'll just disable the blasted digital signature for good.<br>
<br>
On 01/06/12 17:11, Norbert Bollow wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20120601091105.7A2501F5A@quill.bollow.ch"
type="cite">My vision for Enhanced Cooperation is to put both
areas together, jointly, under a single institutional "Enhanced
Cooperation Task Force" framework, modeled to some extent on the
IETF, and a single set of process principles that are designed to
operate as closely as possible to what Daniel Kalchev calls "the
'common sense' law that every human being on this planet knows
unconditionally". The output of this "Enhanced Cooperation Task
Force" would be Request For Action (RFA) documents, which
analogously to RFCs would not have direct legal force, but they'd
be informative and persuasive and maybe eventually any government
that doesn't follow the recommendations of the RFAs without giving
really good reasons for choosing differently will get voted out of
office quickly. </blockquote>
<br>
Really interesting and audacious. Back in 1997 ISOC formed an
Internet Societal Task Force (ISTF) that was intended as a
counterpart to the IETF and the IRTF, but dealing with public policy
issues. It never took off due to lack of involvement by governments
and was eventually superseded by WSIS the following year. Actually
when I commenced my doctoral studies on Internet governance my
intention was also to propose an IETF-like body for public policy
issues, though what I eventually proposed bore more less resemblance
to the IETF. Others (including Avri) made similar proposals that
the IGF should adopt an IETF-like model: see <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.intgovforum.org/contributions/IETF-as-model.pdf">http://www.intgovforum.org/contributions/IETF-as-model.pdf</a>.<br>
<br>
So whilst I would have opposed this if the CSTD had recommended to
form its on working group on EC, since they didn't, I would support
us forming one anyway, and inviting governments to participate in
it. I foresee that they will ignore the invitation because the
group hasn't been formed by the UN, but let's do it anyway and see
how much traction the group can get without them.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<p style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="color:black">Dr
Jeremy Malcolm<br>
Senior Policy Officer</span></b><br>
<span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black">Consumers
International</span><br>
<span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:gray">Kuala Lumpur Office for
Asia-Pacific and the Middle East<br>
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia<br>
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599</span></p>
<!--<p><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:darkred"><b>Consumers in the Information Society</b></span><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#999999"> Register now at <a href="http://A2Knetwork.org/infosoc2012">A2Knetwork.org/infosoc2012</a></p>-->
<p><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#999999">Follow <a
href="http://twitter.com/Consumers_Int">@ConsumersInt</a><!-- and <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/search/wcrd2012">#WCRD2012</a>--></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#999999">Like us at <a
href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational">www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#999999">Read our <a
href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality"
target="_blank"> email confidentiality notice</a>. Don't
print this email unless necessary.</span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>