Sorry I missed ccing the igc list in previous mail.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Louis Pouzin (well)</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pouzin@well.com">pouzin@well.com</a>></span><br>
Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 15:17<br>Subject: [governance] On the MAG thematic working groups<br>To: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <<a href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br>Hi Sala,<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="gmail_quote"><br>I'd be interested in a sub-theme within managing critical internet resources:<br><br><b>Multiple name spaces in internet</b><br> - diversity of language scripts<br>
- regional spaces<br>
- brand names management<br> - diversisty of jurisdictions<br> - directory structures<br> - name collisions<br> - scopes<br> - inter-operability<br> - (more)<br><br>Worth a workshop with a half dozen stakeholders.<br><br>
Cheers<br>- - -<div class="im"><div><br>On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 20:03, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com" target="_blank">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Thanks Fouad and Katitza.<br><br>I would suggest that various people from the IGC volunteer to steer discussions within IGC on the following:<br><ol><li>Internet Governance for Development</li><li>Emerging Issues</li><li>
Managing Critical Internet Resources</li><li>Security, Openness and Privacy</li><li>Access and Diversity</li><div><li>Taking Stock and the Way Forward</li></div></ol>One option is to initiate 6 separate threads within the Governance mailing list which are subject specific. People can find their respective flows and take the initiative to raise certain issues. <br>
<br> It will also be good to draw from issues raised in the past IGFs which have yet to be resolved. The appropriate findings from the work of the Dynamic Coalition on Mapping Internet Governance should be considered by the various sub groups. People have the liberty to raise issues that they feel should be covered and canvassed. It will also be good to consolidate all the views and hear minority views and feed this into a central document. <br>
<br>Current MAG members can then raise these issues for us as a list after consensus is reached on the various themes.<br><br><u><b>Suggested Time Frame</b></u><br><br>20th February, 2012 - initiate consultation with IGC and invite feedback and consultations<br>
<br>24th February, 2012 - consolidate positions and perspectives and put to the list for 48 hour period of consensus<br>26th February, 2012 - finalise and put the list for final comments<br>27th February, 2012 - send to current MAG members to take our positions to the MAG Groups<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br> </div></div></div></div>
</div><br>
</div><br>