<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16440"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN class=678171217-04022012><FONT color=#0000ff
face=Arial>Thanks for this Marilla but I'm a bit unsure as to the status
of what you have quoted below and what role if any the IGC can or should play
in this.</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN class=678171217-04022012><FONT color=#0000ff
face=Arial>A</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial>s i was going through
the points and thinking of responses/positions a few things jumped out at
me... </FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN class=678171217-04022012><FONT color=#0000ff
face=Arial> the sheer complexity of the issues that are
being addressed. While many of them are part of the on-going discourse in a
variety of academic disciplines and within the broader CS community to a
considerable degree the Internet "changes everything" :) that is, the
Internet/ICTs changes the nature and impact of a lot of traditional governance
issues/approaches/strategies. I don't know that those have been very
well-worked out partly because ICTs are such a work in progress (mGov anyone?)
but issues like "transparency", and organization and governance of a CS
"caucus" need very much to be thought through in our current if evolving
environment.</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN class=678171217-04022012>
<FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial>the significane of what is being discussed and
to a degree "decided" upon here. To some extent (it's hard to know the
degree) these discussions/developments around IG and the IGF are providing a
model for broader developments in governance in an Internet era. This gives
discussions on these issues a significance rather beyond the immediate
planning/staging of the IGC or IGF.</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012>What this tells me, and particularly from a CS
perspective is that we as CS in the context of the IGC need to step back a bit
and enter into a more deliberate process of reflection and positon development
on these very important issues. </SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012>I'm wondering if funds couldn't be found to stage an
online/offline event to discuss these issues and to help to formulate a CS
position on these. (Note that the OECD counterpart to the IGC has now obtained
limited but useful funding from Soros/OSI.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012>Best,</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012>Mike</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=678171217-04022012> </SPAN>-----Original
Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org
[mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Marilia
Maciel<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 03, 2012 4:42 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
governance@lists.igcaucus.org; Anriette Esterhuysen<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[governance] MAG Selection [URGENT]<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<P class=MsoNormal></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Congratulations to the tentative list of
nominees. Thanks to NomCom for performing this important task and thanks in
advance for the report they are producing. </FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">As you know, one of the topics that are
being discussed in the WG on IGF improvements is precisely the process for
nominating MAG members and the role of MAG. MAG will have an even more
fundamental role in a strengthened IGF and the next group of selected MAG
members will be invited to find concrete mechanisms to give shape to some of
the suggestions for improvement that will come out of the WG. That is to say
that, in my view, the next group of MAG members will be appointed in a crucial
moment. </FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">It is very important that they are
supported by the community and that they are able to reverberate this support
and legitimacy. The selection process is important on this regard, as it puts
in place an important cornerstone. This is why this process needs to be
documented and that the parameters for selection need to be made
clear.</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT></SPAN> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The WG has been discussing parameters for
the selection of MAG and also some of the responsibilities of MAG members. I
reproduce below a compilation (rough text) of points raised by the WG about
the MAG, not only as a contribution for the report of the NomCom (if some of
these topics could be covered in their report, it would be great, as we would
be walking the talk), but also for discussion. From this thread I am sure that
this topic is a concern of the community, and it would be great to have
feedback about what is being discussed in the WG about it. The report will
probably be structured with broad agreements as "headlines", further detailed
on more specific proposals.</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Marília</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><BR></FONT></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><B>B.II – MAG</B></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Broad agreement on the need to rotate
MAG members regularly, keep MAG meetings transparent </B></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Broad agreement on the openness and
transparency of MAG meetings</B></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- The MAG should open its meeting to
observers and make its proceedings available in the form of a live text
streaming. This verbatim record is available on the IGF Web site. This
proceeding is recommended for future meetings in order to enhance the openness
and transparency of its work. </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Rotation of the MAG members, with one
third rotated every year, should be preserved, with a three-year limit to each
member’s term in order to provide opportunities to all interested participants
and to ensure fair representation</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Broad agreement that the constitution of
the MAG should be done in a transparent and documented fashion</FONT></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Broad agreement on the transparency of
the self-management by each stakeholder group</B></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- In light of transparency, stakeholder
groups should publicise their selection process and should identify the
process that works best for their own culture and methods of
engagement</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Selection of any stakeholder group may
not be confined to be mediated through any one particular body.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- The selection would be based on proposed
candidate lists made by the three non-governmental stakeholder groups. The
stakeholder groups are encouraged to nominate a sufficiently large slate of
candidates to provide some flexibility in selection of MAG members and are
asked to ensure appropriate gender balance </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- One possibility mentioned by the MAG
group itself last November: </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> - A form of 'triage'
that would be used to ensure appropriate geographical balance among MAG
members. This 'triage' could be carried out by a trusted group of former
non-governmental MAG members, perhaps including some MAG members who are being
rotated out. This trusted group would work in active consultation with the
respective stakeholder groups. </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The recommendation would then be submitted
to the Secretary-General for approval. One proposal was that the list of all
MAG nominees to be submitted to the Secretary-General should be published on
the IGF website. </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Another selection process was mentioned
capturing the essence of the NomCom idea, or we better call it "selection
committee" to avoid confusion with existing systems in other
organizations.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> - The selection
Committee members, appointed by the IGF Chair, should be drawn fairly from
representatives of stakeholders across the different regions and
constituencies.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Preferably, the Selection Committee would
include experts with wide-ranging knowledge of Internet governance, previous
experience of program preparation and strong links to various stakeholder
groups.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">This Selection Committee would select
candidates for the MAG ensuring balanced representation of geographical
distribution, gender and the wide range of stakeholders. The final selection
of candidates should be submitted to the UN Secretary-General for final
approval.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Open and transparent selection process and
working process</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Broad agreement that the MAG needs a
clear Terms of Reference. </B></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Requirements for MAG members:</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Potential stakeholder representatives
should represent groups’ or constituencies’ interest and not private
interests.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Selected members should
present:</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Proven ability to work as a team member
</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Active participation in the IGF process
</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Extensive linkages within one's own
stakeholder group and, if possible, to other stakeholder groups </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Experience and expertise in Internet
governance issues</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Responsibilities of MAG
members:</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Attend three meetings in Geneva per
year; Participate in the yearly global meeting;</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Participate in inter-sessional
work; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Make outreach to wider community,
including national and regional IGF type initiatives and bring other networks
into the MAG; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Bring in comments from the
community; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Explain recommendations to the
community. </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Willingness to commit to work and
follow through </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Responsibilities of the MAG as a
whole:</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- guidelines on actual tour of duty
(length of service, rotations, performance criteria such as
removal/replacement of MAG members that do not participate)</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Develop the detailed programme including
the identification of issues of concern; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Selecting workshops and other meetings;
</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Defining how best to plan and organize
the meetings; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Organizing main sessions and where
necessary participate in dedicated thematic working groups; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Establishing linkages between workshops
and main sessions;</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Facilitating the organization of
workshops; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Coordinating panels and supporting
panellists, moderators and speakers at the annual meeting; </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Liaising with their respective
communities;</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">-Publishing reports. </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Additional outreach with other
organizations and in conjunction with secretariat</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Miscellaneous: </FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Giving idea of MAG selection process,
keep it a dynamic committee.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Consider the role of the MAG in the
context of an evolving IGF and in the context of IGF improvements and the
recommendations for IGF improvements.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Consider relationships between the MAG
and secretariat--roles and responsibilities</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Consider the role of the MAG in context
of IGF no longer being just a single event but rather having evolved into a
process.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Consider mechanisms to enable the MAG to
be more efficient.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">- Importance of open consultations and
role of MAG as facilitator and listener of what happens in consultations,
important input into the process</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT class=Apple-style-span
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </P><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen
<SPAN dir=ltr><<A
href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex"
class=gmail_quote>Dear Parminder and all<BR>
<DIV class=im><BR>On 02/02/12 02:31, parminder wrote:<BR>> Congrats to
all the nominees. A very good list.<BR><BR></DIV>Yes.. congrats to all.<BR>
<DIV class=im>><BR>> However, independent of the results produced
which I welcome and<BR>> support, I strongly agree with the sentiment of
Avri's questions below.<BR><BR></DIV>Yes, so do I.<BR>
<DIV class=im><BR>> Representativity is the central issue of democracy,
and its processes<BR>> must be taken very very seriously, even if
sometimes just forthe<BR>> process's sake. I may be wrong, but I seem not
to have seen the kind of<BR>> openness (proactive and not just formal),
transparency, out-reach effort<BR>> etc that is required for the
nomination/ election activity. Things like:<BR>> we need to make repeated
calls for nomination, encourage people to<BR>> nominate themselves and
others, pulbicize the process and perhaps the<BR>> list of nomcom members
as well, make active out reach to various CS<BR>> entities inviting
nomination, keeping the list posted of all<BR>> developments,
......<BR>><BR>> For instance, APC I am sure will forward its own
slate of names to the<BR>> IGF secretariat. They should have been invited
to submit their nominees<BR>> for IGC nomcom's consideration as well (and
this has happened in the<BR>> past).<BR><BR></DIV>Parminder, we actually
did submit our list of names to the IGC nomcom as<BR>we think the IGC
selection is an important one. We are not sure that<BR>the IGC nomcom
considered our list as did not receive any acknowledgement.<BR><BR>One
person on our list is in the IGC list: Bill Drake, and we are happy<BR>to
see this. Bill has worked very hard with the MAG as a 'non-MAG'<BR>member
from the beginning, and has been a strong advocate for<BR>development issues
and CS interests, so I really hope he does make the MAG.<BR><BR>The other
people on our list were (as Bill posted).<BR><BR>Carlos Afonso
(Brazil)<BR>Magaly Pazello (Brazil)<BR>Shahzad Ahmad (Pakistan)<BR>Anriette
Esterhuysen (South Africa)<BR>David Souter (United Kingdom /IISD)<BR><BR>We
will send these directly to the secretariat as well.<BR><BR>Anriette<BR>
<DIV>
<DIV class=h5><BR><BR><BR>Enriching our catchment of potential candidates
and thus the<BR>> final list in this way greatly enhances IGC's
legitimacy. And in the<BR>> civil society space legitimacy building and
losing is a very live and<BR>> dynamic process. Every single act adds or
takes away from it. At times,<BR>> like for the WG on IGF improvements,
IGC has been considered the single<BR>> point of CS contact and
representivity. We need to work hard to live up<BR>> to such a high
responsibility, as mentioned by Avri. And I am really not<BR>> sure if we
did in this case, though I am happy to be corrected.<BR>><BR>> It is
important to note that in the WG on IGF improvements we have been<BR>>
seeking higher transparency, focussed and active out reach effort,
broad<BR>> basing the pool of candidates etc for MAG selection, and we
need to<BR>> practise what we preach.<BR>><BR>> Among many other
things, I also could not understand the meaning and use<BR>> of having
candidates submit their information in the 'required' format<BR>> after
the list of nominees is published. Isnt the required information<BR>>
supposed to be submitted precisely to aid the evaluation of
nominees?<BR>><BR>> There a few other points I will like to make, but
a little later...<BR>> parminder<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> On
Wednesday 01 February 2012 09:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote:<BR>>>
Hi,<BR>>><BR>>> Good names all.<BR>>><BR>>>
But,<BR>>><BR>>> What process was used?<BR>>> Was there a
public call for nominations? Did I miss seeing that?<BR>>> Where are
their statements? Did I miss seeing that? Are they posted on the
web site anywhere?<BR>>> Is there a reason for each of these
selections in terms of IGC expectations? Did I miss seeing that? Are
they posted somewhere?<BR>>><BR>>> In the past we have gotten a
Nomcom chair outlining everything in detail. Did I miss
that?<BR>>><BR>>> The IGC's claim to represent Civil Society in
Ig is tenuous at best<BR>>> The lack of any information (or did I miss
it?) on this selection risks that even
further.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> avri<BR>>><BR>>> On
1 Feb 2012, at 08:06, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
wrote:<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>> Dear
All,<BR>>>><BR>>>> The Names that were submitted to the
Coordinators by the NomCom are as follows:<BR>>>> •
Lillian Nalwoga (Ms.) - Uganda<BR>>>> • Izumi
AIZU (Mr) - Japan<BR>>>> • Michael Gurstein
(Mr) - Canada<BR>>>> • Robert Guerra (Mr) -
Canadian & European (Spain)<BR>>>> • Bill Drake
(Mr) - North American (Lives in Geneva)<BR>>>> •
Fatima Cambronero (Ms) - Argentina<BR>>>> • Fouad
Bajwa (Mr) (current MAG member) -
Pakistan<BR>>>><BR>>>> However, these nominees were
advised that failure to send their information in via the required
template would mean that their names would not be
sent.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Kind Regards<BR></DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=im>>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Salanieta T.
Tamanikaiwaimaro <<A
href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</A>>
<mailto:<A
href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</A>>
wrote:<BR>>>> Dear All,<BR>>>><BR>>>> We thank
the NOMCOM for selecting MAG candidates.<BR>>>><BR>>>> In
the interest of transparency, NOMCOM wrote to advise that they had completed
selection of the MAG. We have yet to receive the information in the required
format and an email was sent out to the potential candidates to submit their
information in the template shown within the email. Potential candidates
were advised that failing to have the information submitted in required
format could mean that their names would not be put forward. They have been
given 12 hours to respond to enable this information to be
sent.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Submission of names were to be sent on
the 31st January 2012.<BR>>>><BR>>>> --<BR>>>>
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala<BR>>>><BR>>>> Tweeter:
@SalanietaT<BR>>>> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro<BR>>>>
Cell: <A href="tel:%2B679%20998%202851" value="+6799982851">+679 998
2851</A><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>
--<BR>>>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka
Sala<BR>>>><BR>>>> Tweeter: @SalanietaT<BR>>>>
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro<BR>>>> Cell: <A
href="tel:%2B679%20998%202851" value="+6799982851">+679 998
2851</A><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>
____________________________________________________________<BR>>>>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR></DIV>>>>
<A
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</A>
<mailto:<A
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</A>><BR>
<DIV class=HOEnZb>
<DIV class=h5>>>> To be removed from the list,
visit:<BR>>>> <A
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target=_blank>http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</A><BR>>>><BR>>>>
For all other list information and functions, see:<BR>>>> <A
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target=_blank>http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</A><BR>>>>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<BR>>>>
<A href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
target=_blank>http://www.igcaucus.org/</A><BR>>>><BR>>>>
Translate this email: <A href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target=_blank>http://translate.google.com/translate_t</A><BR>>>><BR>>><BR><BR></DIV></DIV><SPAN
class=HOEnZb><FONT
color=#888888>--<BR>------------------------------------------------------<BR>anriette
esterhuysen <A
href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</A><BR>executive director,
association for progressive communications<BR><A href="http://www.apc.org"
target=_blank>www.apc.org</A><BR>po box 29755, melville 2109<BR>south
africa<BR>tel/fax <A href="tel:%2B27%2011%20726%201692"
value="+27117261692">+27 11 726
1692</A><BR><BR></FONT></SPAN><BR>____________________________________________________________<BR>You
received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR> <A
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</A><BR>To
be removed from the list, visit:<BR> <A
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target=_blank>http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</A><BR><BR>For all other
list information and functions, see:<BR> <A
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target=_blank>http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</A><BR>To edit your
profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<BR> <A
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
target=_blank>http://www.igcaucus.org/</A><BR><BR>Translate this email: <A
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target=_blank>http://translate.google.com/translate_t</A><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR
clear=all>
<DIV><BR></DIV>-- <BR>Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade<BR>FGV Direito
Rio<BR><BR>Center for Technology and Society<BR>Getulio Vargas
Foundation<BR>Rio de Janeiro - Brazil<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>