<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text="#333333" bgcolor="#ffffff"><br><div><div></div><div>
<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Are IP addresses property or public resources? </div></div></blockquote><br></div></div></div><div>ARIN holds that IP address space is not property but is managed as a </div><div>public resource. </div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 7.5pt; line-height: 13.5pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; ">
<span style="font-size: 10pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);">The is also consistent</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white;"> with the Council of Europe's </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; ">Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on the
management of the Internet protocol address resources in the public
interest (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 29 September 2010</span><br>
<span style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; ">at the 1094th meeting of the Ministers'
Deputies)<a name="133e7c4fe7a3feea__ftnref1" title=""><span><span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:white">[1]</span></span></span></a> is relevant.</span>
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:7.5pt;line-height:13.5pt;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#0070c0">[Correction </span><span style="font-size:10pt"></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0); ">The is also consistent should read, "This is also consistent"</span></p>
<span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">[…]Paragraph <span style="background:white">11 of the Ministerial Text where the Committee of
Ministers, therefore, declares the following:-</span><br>
<br>
<i><span style="background:yellow">- Internet protocol address resources should
be regarded as shared<br>
<b><u>public resources</u></b> and <b><u>allocated and managed in the
public interest</u></b> by the</span><br>
entities entrusted with these tasks, taking into account the present and<br>
future needs of Internet users;</i></span>
<div><br clear="all">
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%">
<div>
<p><a name="133e7c4fe7a3feea__ftn1" title=""><span><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#0070c0"><span><span style="font-size:8pt;line-height:115%;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">[1]</span></span></span></span></a><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#0070c0"><a href="https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1678299&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=C3C3C3&BackColorIntranet=EDB021&BackColorLogged=F5D383" target="_blank"><span style="color:#0070c0">https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1678299&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=C3C3C3&BackColorIntranet=EDB021&BackColorLogged=F5D383</span></a></span><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#0070c0"></span></p>
</div></div></div><div class="im"><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Address holders may have certain rights (such as the </div>
<div>right to be the registrant of the address block, the right to transfer the </div><div>registration, etc.) but these rights intersect with additional rights to the</div><div>the same address blocks which are held by the community (such as the </div>
<div>right to visibility into the public portion of registrations). It is the registry </div><div>policies (set by the community via open and transparent processes) that </div><div>governs the intersection and application of these rights.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>This is working quite well and is more open and transparent than most governance mechanisms, in my view. </div><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div>Regarding what it is needed with respect to law enforcement, I do believe </div><div>(personally; ARIN has not considered this matter) that there could be some </div>
<div>
use for an appropriate framework for handling law enforcement requests for</div><div>transnational orders affecting the Internet. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>This is of interest as we are preparing and designing coordination mechanisms within Fiji and externally etc and is something that should be clearly mapped etc. </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div> I'll note that such a frameworkwould facilitate each country adopting its own specific laws to implement those aspects of the framework compatible with their worldview. </div>
</div></blockquote><div class="im"><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>I am much less sanguine about the prospects for a common set of global mechanisms, </div>
<div>due to the difficulty in defining any mechanisms that operate across countries.</div><div><br></div><font color="#888888"><div>/John</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></font></div></blockquote></div></div><br><br clear="all">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div><br></div>-- <br><div>Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala</div><div><br></div><div>Tweeter: @SalanietaT</div><div>Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro</div><div>Cell: <a href="tel:%2B679%20998%202851" value="+6799982851" target="_blank">+679 998 2851</a></div>
<div> </div><div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:16px"><br>
</span></font></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala</div><div><br></div><div>Tweeter: @SalanietaT</div><div>Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro</div><div>Cell: +679 998 2851</div>
<div> </div><div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:16px"><br></span></font></div><br>