<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#333333" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<font face="sans-serif">The proposed actions to me appear to be of a
technical nature (atleast the first two, other than the fund raising
option) on which i cant see why there could be such a difference of
views. Therefore rather than going through the tedious process of a
yes/ no vote, why dont we just invite objections if any, in default of
which coordinators go ahead with the planned actions. <br>
<br>
On the issue of fund raising, seeking voluntary contributions for a
corpus of $ 500 too doesnt appear to be such a big issue. Unless there
are objections raised to it, coordinators shd be able to go ahead with
this proposal too... parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
</font>On Wednesday 16 November 2011 12:39 PM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:KovenRonald@aol.com">KovenRonald@aol.com</a>
wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:ad3b6.66277ef3.3bf4bbb1@aol.com" type="cite"><font
face="arial,helvetica"><font family="SANSSERIF" size="2"
color="#000000" face="Geneva"><br>
In a message dated 11/16/11 4:48:46 AM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a> writes:<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></font>
<blockquote cite=""
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px;"
type="CITE"><font face="arial,helvetica"><font family="SANSSERIF"
size="2" color="#000000" face="Geneva"><br>
All in favour for merging the list and website say – AYE (YES)<br>
All in favour of hosting the list and website on an independent server
say –AYE (YES)<br>
All in favour for fundraising say – AYE (YES)<br>
</font></font></blockquote>
<font face="arial,helvetica"><font family="SANSSERIF" size="2"
color="#000000" face="Geneva"><br>
<br>
Aye to all three proposals.<br>
<br>
Rony Koven</font></font></blockquote>
</body>
</html>