It appears to me, as the (wo)man in the street, with perhaps a little more technical knowledge than average but with no claim at all on technical expertise, that this is not a specifically technical problem. Further, from the explanations that everyone is offering, the risk involved is a risk associated with individual human error and is a comparatively minor risk. And finally - my own personal agenda - within a global context it makes me uncomfortable that the Latin script should be allowed preferential treatment. I understand that Latin script/ascii code was where it all began. I understand that, that being the case, if the identical symbol is used in more than one script then for practical reasons the "second" script will have to defer to the first, and it seems that people already agree about that necessity. Otherwise than that I think that "the benefit of the doubt" should be exercised on the side of the non-Latin scripts.<div>
Power needs to be exercised with balance. ICANN has the power, "we" provide the balance. </div><div>Unless ICANN can demonstrate that EITHER this is a technical problem OR that it has carried out a wide survey of a couple of billion people like me and the majority claims to be confused by the two strings, then it seems to me that Bulgaria should get what it is asking for.</div>
<div>I dislike having 3 person expert panels deciding for me what confuses me :-)</div><div>Based on the knowledge I currently have I would suggest that Bulgaria be given .бг </div><div>I hope I have answered your question. Sorry to be so wordy.</div>
<div>Deirdre</div><div><br></div><div><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 November 2011 10:43, Imran Ahmed Shah <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ias_pk@yahoo.com" target="_blank">ias_pk@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Thanks Deirdre, you are right, you have given a good statement and example.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">So, are you agree that its ICANN function to resolve it?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Regards<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Imran Ahmad Shah</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt"><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Deirdre Williams<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 09, 2011 04:12 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>; Daniel Kalchev</span></p><div><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [governance] Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .?? (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?<u></u><u></u></div>
<p></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Which is what I meant by "has anyone asked us?" <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">It is probably no longer politically correct to describe an argument as "jesuitical", but prevaricating, dissembling and equivocating still work. As someone else said earlier - if there is a technical issue then it becomes ICANN's responsibility to work towards its resolution. Human error has to be left with humans.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div><div><p class="MsoNormal">The computer is dealing with a pattern of on and off - 0 and 1. That pattern must be unique otherwise the thing won't work. If I am not paying attention and click on the wrong link then that becomes my problem, as well as if I don't read the signs properly when driving and turn down the wrong road. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div><div><p class="MsoNormal">If the strings "behind" .$% and <a href="mailto:.@&" target="_blank">.@&</a> are the same, that is ICANN's (IANA's) function, that is what the institutions were set up for, and we rely on them to fix it<br>
Deirdre<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">On 9 November 2011 05:10, Daniel Kalchev <<a href="mailto:daniel@digsys.bg" target="_blank">daniel@digsys.bg</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><br><br>On 08.11.11 14:44, Adam Peake wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><br>I'm guessing (a technically ignorant guess) that for a Bulgarian IDN ccTLD, registrars should be able to recognize if the string someone was trying to register was Cyrillic or not. So, for example, anything that contained ascii could automatically be rejected. Not correct? Not eyes that recognize, but software.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal">Your guessing is correct. But... :)<br><br>It is not computers that may be confused. For computers, these are utterly different strings. In fact, for a computer, any string, no matter how 'similar' someone claims it to be, as long as it has even a single different bit - is different. period.<br>
<br>Now, about humans... I have been discussing this with a lot of people all the way since this saga began. Human brain works in such a way, that humans do not recognize individual letters, nor they care of their similarity to any other individual letter. Humans recognize words. Now, before someone jumps in to say domain names are not words (*) just hold on a bit.<br>
<br>There is this famous English saying "it all looks greek to me" (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_to_me" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_to_me</a>)<br>It says it all.<br><br>It is not only Cyrillic using users that will immediately recognize any text containing Cyrillic or ASCII as different, but also the typical America will too. They may not know that this is Cyrillic or Greek, but they will know it is not ASCII, or rather it is "strange characters". Or in our context: oh, this is one of those funny IDN domains.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">
<br>So I am guessing it would be possible to ensure no ascii string could be registered under IDN .BG, and if that were so then the chance of having a confusing string under either .BR or IDN .BG would be remote.<u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal">It is not only possible. It is certain that there will be no ASCII sub-domains under .бг<span style="color:#888888"><br><br><span>Daniel</span></span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br><br>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br><br>For all other list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br><br>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><br><br clear="all"><u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal">-- <br>“The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979<u></u><u></u></p>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>“The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979<br>
</div>