<span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">Dear Raúl and colleagues:</span><br><br><span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">Please find my comments below:</span><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Raul Echeberria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raul@lacnic.net">raul@lacnic.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><br><div><div>El 22/09/2011, a las 00:19, Jeremy Malcolm escribió:</div><div class="im">
<br><blockquote type="cite">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 22/09/11 01:11, Miguel Alcaine wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">I would like to make a distinction between EC and EC
in the context of the WSIS outcomes. If one read the famous
paragraphs on EC, it is found that EC in the Tunis Agenda refers
only to Governments. <br>
<br>
While I would had liked to have EC spelled to all actors in the
WSIS outcome documents; it is not. </blockquote>
<br>
This is so only if you restrict your view to paragraph 69, but you
can't look just at that paragraph outside of its context. There are
about ten paragraphs on EC (though they are intermixed with the
paragraphs about the IGF, lending weight to the argument that the
IGF is an integral part of EC rather than a separate channel of
reform). Most of these do leave room for a multi-stakeholder
interpretation, eg. paragraph 71:<br>
<br>
"The process towards enhanced cooperation, to be started by the UN
Secretary-General, involving all relevant organizations by the end
of the first quarter of 2006, will involve all stakeholders in their
respective roles, will proceed as quickly as possible consistent
with legal process, and will be responsive to innovation."<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div>Good points Jeremy: </div><div><br></div><div>The paragraph 71 also says: </div><div><br>
</div><div>"Relevant organizations should commence a process towards enhanced
cooperation involving all stakeholders, proceeding as quickly as
possible and responsive to innovation. The same relevant organizations
shall be requested to provide annual performance reports."</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><div><div><br></div><div>What shows clearly that EC was not mentioned in the documents neither as a governmental process nor as a single process. Is the multiplicity of different changes that have to be processed at every level, including changes in the way in which governments and intergovernmental organizations work. </div>
<div><br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">This is also a good point and a very interesting one. Interpreting the paragraph, one might say that an organization, who feels itself relevant in the IG realm, should also commence a process towards enhanced cooperation.</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">
<br style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">Nevertheless, all actors should insist on having all included not only in the process of EC but also in the expected results of EC.</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">
<br style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">Best,</span><br style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);"><br style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">Miguel</span><br>
<br><b><span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">Disclaimer</span></b><br style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);"><span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 255);">My ideas are those of my own and does not represent any position of my employer or any other institution</span><br>
<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><div><div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div>Raúl </div><div class="im"><div><br></div><div><br></div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
One can easily argue that paragraph 69 is directed to governments in
relation to CIRs, and that the involvement of other stakeholders in
CIR management is already a given and not controversial. Thus there
was no need to mention the other stakeholders in that particular
paragraph.<br>
<br>
<div>-- <br><p style="margin-bottom:12pt"><b><span style="color:black">Dr
Jeremy Malcolm<br>
Project Coordinator</span></b><br>
<span style="font-size:9pt;color:black">Consumers
International</span><br>
<span style="font-size:9pt;color:gray">Kuala Lumpur Office
for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East<br>
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia<br>
Tel: <a href="tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599" value="+60377261599" target="_blank">+60 3 7726 1599</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9pt;color:rgb(31, 73, 125)">Consumers
International (CI) is the world federation of consumer groups
that, working together with its members, serves as the only
independent and authoritative global voice for consumers. With
over 220 member organisations in 115 countries, we are
building a powerful international movement to help protect and
empower consumers everywhere.</span><span style="font-size:9pt;color:navy"><br>
<u><a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/" target="_blank">www.consumersinternational.org</a></u><br>
<u><a href="http://twitter.com/Consumers_Int" target="_blank">Twitter
@ConsumersInt</a></u><br>
</span><br>
<span style="font-size:8pt;color:rgb(153, 153, 153)">Read
our <a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality" target="_blank">
email confidentiality notice</a>. Don't print this email
unless necessary.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div><br><div>
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Raul </div><div>Twitter @raulecheberria</div></div>
</div>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br>