<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#333333">
<br>
<br>
On Friday 26 August 2011 05:05 PM, McTim wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxhDXddECZrwJzc0j_cUS8N8V1uK4j8Vja9XoWNAuHx7RA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 8/26/11, Paul Lehto <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:lehto.paul@gmail.com"><lehto.paul@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
The fundamental question, thus, is: Who's in Charge?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
The fundamental answer (at least for the last 4 decades is "no one,
and everyone").
I'm happy for that to continue. Do we as a Caucus really want to
advocate that every state, every municipality can regulate the
Internet globally?
</pre>
</blockquote>
The option is US alone regulates (along with some allied-interest
countries), or as you say every state/ municipality is able to do
it, or there is a more democratically decided global (loose and
broad) framework of agreed norms and principles, giving enough
flexibilities, but perhaps over some predictable calibrated set of
options, to states/ municipalities etc. <br>
<br>
I choose the third option, you cha tell me which one do you choose.<br>
<br>
Parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>