<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#333333">
<br>
<br>
On Monday 11 April 2011 08:43 AM, McTim wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:BANLkTinU_yxmZYxLSj4BzFkuhXjt-VKDfw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:37 AM, David Allen
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:David_Allen_AB63@post.harvard.edu"><David_Allen_AB63@post.harvard.edu></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Apr 10, 2011, at 5:23 PM, McTim wrote:</pre>
<br>
<pre wrap="">
Provenance is never precise, is it. But many (quite well) informed folks,
wrt the US comms policy process, were satisfied that the private
Google-Verizon deal set the terms for what emerged finally at the FCC.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
It was the previous multilateral negotiations that formed the basis of
the FCC proposal. It also informed the GV agreement. If you notice,
the most objected to bit of the GV (treat wireless differently) isn't
in the FCC proposal.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
It is very much in the FCC proposal, and the most criticized part of
it. parminder <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:BANLkTinU_yxmZYxLSj4BzFkuhXjt-VKDfw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
A
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">little Googling is illustrative.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I Google every day!
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>