<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Hi Bill<br>
    <br>
    No. I am not interested in recommendations. We already have
    international instruments and international human rights courts. 
    Any recommendation on this issue, at this point, will be to control
    content rather than to open it. This is a FoE case. This is how, I
    believe, is the right way and we should frame the discussion.
    Katitza<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:3EDF6E85-2E68-4BDD-B18D-B40A5AE80048@graduateinstitute.ch"
      type="cite">Hi
      <div><br>
        <div>
          <div>On Dec 12, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:</div>
          <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Hi William,<br>
              <br>
              We already have international instruments that protects
              freedom of expression. It sets precedents of what it can
              be disclosed. Why we need new rules? Can you explain me? <br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          There's a draft IGC text saying that this case shows we need a
          new framework of principles to guide global IG, which
          presumably would affect such things, so I asked why how what
          do people have in mind.  You replied you were thinking of the
          HRC.  The HRC is a deliberative body, populated by China,
          Saudi Arabia et al, that is supposed to make recommendations
          to the General Assembly.  So I assumed you meant the HRC
          should make recommendations on new principles per the draft
          IGC text.   If instead you meant that the HRC could assess
          this as a freedom of expression case in accordance with
          existing international rights instruments and make
          recommendations, ok, but the same question applies: Which of
          the HRC's member governments could we expect to argue that
          case and make recs we'd find congenial?  One would like to
          think that some would, but with <span class="Apple-style-span"
            style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre-wrap;">classified
            national security information it could be a tough sell. </span>In
          any event, a FOE majority seems unlikely, and even if one
          could be assembled, it's questionable whether HRC recs (not
          heretofore highly impactful AFAIK) would alter any behavior.
           It'd certainly be an interesting debate though, and I'd be
          happy to have it unfolding down the street from me.  Prospects
          might be better in an international court setting with
          nominally independent judges and legal experts etc, rather
          than an intergovernmental negotiation body...</div>
        <div><br>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <br>
              As Frank La Rue said: "<span data-jsid="text">"If there is
                a responsibility by leaking information it is of,
                exclusively of the person that made the leak, and not of
                the media that publish it." Frank La Rue, UN Special
                Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression <a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2010/s3089025.htm"
                  rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span>http://www.abc.net.au/worl</span><wbr><span
                    class="word_break"></span><span>dtoday/content/2010/s30890</span><wbr><span
                    class="word_break"></span>25.htm</a></span>"<br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          Sure<br>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <br>
              <span data-jsid="text">Amnesty International: "On the
                leaking of national defence information: While employees
                of a government have the right to freedom of expression,
                they also have duties as an employee, so a government
                has more scope to impose restrictions on <span
                  class="text_exposed_hide">...</span><span
                  class="text_exposed_show">its employees than it would
                  have for private individuals who receive or republish
                  information. However, Amnesty International would be
                  concerned if a government were to seek to punish a
                  person who, for reasons of conscience, released in a
                  responsible manner information that they reasonably
                  believed to be evidence of human rights violations
                  that the government was attempting to keep secret in
                  order to prevent the public learning the truth about
                  the violations." <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/wikileaks-and-freedom-expression-2010-12-09"
                    rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span>http://www.amnesty.org/en/</span><wbr><span
                      class="word_break"></span><span>news-and-updates/wikileaks</span><wbr><span
                      class="word_break"></span><span>-and-freedom-expression-20</span><wbr><span
                      class="word_break"></span>10-12-09</a></span></span><br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          By these criteria, Bradley Manning's in trouble.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000">On Dec
                12, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Michael Gurstein wrote:</font></div>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div><br>
              I think the argument here is that we (?) should get in
              soon with some sort<br>
              of suggested approach to a broad governance framework
              because the "powers<br>
              that be" will be feverishly working on their approach and
              it will emerge<br>
              very quickly and very forcefully.</div>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>Neither half of this is very clear to me but I'm certainly
          open to persuasion…</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Cheers,</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Bill</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <br>
              <blockquote
                cite="mid:91CF96AB-21E1-4CB8-9FBE-C3B70B8D8258@graduateinstitute.ch"
                type="cite">
                <pre wrap="">Hi Katitza,

On Dec 12, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:

</pre>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <pre wrap="">I am not familiar with United Nations structure but I was thinking within the Human Rights Council, to upheld International Human Rights Law on Freedom of Expression. Wikileaks is a Freedom of expression issue.  But again: I am not familiar of how those Council's work. It would be good to know more about it.
</pre>
                </blockquote>
                <pre wrap=""><a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/membership.htm">http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/membership.htm</a>

Which of those governments could we expect to adopt international rights-based principles protecting the nationally illegal disclosure of what they deem to be classified national security information?  It's doubtful there'd be one, much less a majority, in this or any other international body.

Best,

Bill





</pre>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <pre wrap="">On 12/12/10 9:10 AM, Drake William wrote:
</pre>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <pre wrap="">Hi Lee,

On Dec 12, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Lee W McKnight wrote:

</pre>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <pre wrap="">I also appreciate many IGC members and member organizations wish to comment on the WikiLeaks case for their own reasons, but personally would be - depressed - if IGC couldn't manage to comment at all, itself.
</pre>
                    </blockquote>
                    <pre wrap="">If so, then it would be helpful if you could specify the linkages to global Internet governance.  Simply asserting that Wikileaks shows we need a global framework of principles will not by itself be terribly compelling to nonbelievers.  What kinds of principles would address which aspects of the whole phenomenon?  Where would they be established, who would adopt them, how would implementation and compliance be handled, etc…?

I've added other comments on the site; didn't know <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://digress.it">digress.it</a>, handy tool, thanks Jeremy.

Cheers,

Bill


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>

For all list information and functions, see:
     <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a>

Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a>
</pre>
                  </blockquote>
                  <pre wrap="">-- 
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:katitza@eff.org">katitza@eff.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:katitza@datos-personales.org">katitza@datos-personales.org</a> (personal email)

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
   <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
   <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>

For all list information and functions, see:
   <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a>

Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a>
</pre>
                </blockquote>
                <pre wrap="">***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch">william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.williamdrake.org/">www.williamdrake.org</a>
***********************************************************


</pre>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              <br>
              <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:katitza@eff.org">katitza@eff.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:katitza@datos-personales.org">katitza@datos-personales.org</a> (personal email)

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990</pre>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div>
          <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:
            separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;
            font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight:
            normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal;
            orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
            white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
            font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span"
              style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
              font-family: Arial; font-style: normal; font-variant:
              normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;
              line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px;
              text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
              word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;">
              <div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><span
                  class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:
                  separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;
                  font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant:
                  normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;
                  line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px;
                  text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
                  word-spacing: 0px;">
                  <div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><span
                      class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:
                      separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;
                      font-size: medium; font-style: normal;
                      font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal;
                      letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal;
                      orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform:
                      none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
                      word-spacing: 0px;">
                      <div style="word-wrap: break-word;">***********************************************************<br>
                        William J. Drake<br>
                        Senior Associate<br>
                        Centre for International Governance<br>
                        Graduate Institute of International and<br>
                         Development Studies<br>
                        Geneva, Switzerland</div>
                      <div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><a
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch">william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch</a><br>
                        <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.williamdrake.org">www.williamdrake.org</a><br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="word-wrap: break-word;">***********************************************************<br>
                        <br>
                      </div>
                    </span></div>
                </span></div>
            </span></span>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:katitza@eff.org">katitza@eff.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:katitza@datos-personales.org">katitza@datos-personales.org</a> (personal email)

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990</pre>
  </body>
</html>