<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    <span class="date"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/12/join-eff-in-standing-up-against-internet-censorship">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/12/join-eff-in-standing-up-against-internet-censorship</a><br>
      <br>
      December 7th, 2010 </span>
    <div class="deeplinkspost">
      <h1><a
href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/12/join-eff-in-standing-up-against-internet-censorship">Join
          EFF in Standing up Against Internet Censorship </a></h1>
      <i class="author"><span class="cat">EFF: Join EFF in Standing up
          Against Internet Censorship <br>
          <br>
          <a href="https://www.eff.org/blog-categories/call-action">Call
            To Action</a></span> by <a
          href="https://www.eff.org/about/staff/shari-steele">Shari
          Steele</a></i>
      <div class="blogimage"> </div>
      <p>Over the past few weeks, we here at EFF have watched as
        whistleblowing website WikiLeaks has fueled an emotionally
        charged debate about the secrecy of government information and
        the people's right to know. We have welcomed this debate, and
        the fact that there have been myriad views is the embodiment of
        the freedom of expression upon which this country was founded.</p>
      <p>However, we've been greatly troubled by a recent shift in
        focus. The debate about the wisdom of releasing secret
        government documents has turned into a massive attack on the
        right of intermediaries to publish truthful information.
        Suddenly, WikiLeaks has become the Internet's scapegoat, with a
        Who's Who of American and foreign companies choosing to shun the
        site.</p>
      <p>Let's be clear — in the United States, at least, WikiLeaks has
        a fundamental right to <a
          href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17571244799664973711">publish</a>
        truthful political information. And equally important, Internet
        users have a fundamental right to <a
href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6728320798248524934&q">read</a>
        that information and voice their opinions about it. We live in a
        society that values freedom of expression and shuns censorship.
        Unfortunately, those values are only as strong as the will to
        support them — a will that seems to be dwindling now in an
        alarming way. </p>
      <p>On Friday, we <a
href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/12/amazon-and-wikileaks-first-amendment-only-strong">wrote</a>
        about Amazon's disappointing decision to yank hosting services
        from WikiLeaks after a phone call from a senator's office. Since
        then, a cascade of companies and organizations has backed away
        from WikiLeaks. A public figure called for the <a
href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Charge+Harper+aide+assassinate+Julian+Assange+comment+lawyer/3931327/story.html">assassination</a>
        of Assange. <a
href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/paypal-suspends-wikileaks-account/">PayPal</a>,
        <a
          href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20024801-503543.html">MasterCard</a>,
        and <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11938320">Visa</a>
        axed WikiLeaks’ accounts. EveryDNS.net <a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-internet-backlash-us-pressure">pulled</a>
        Wikileaks’ DNS services. Unknown sources continue to cripple
        WikiLeaks with repeated <a
          href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/11825920490868737">denial
          of service attacks</a>. Even the Library of Congress, normally
        a bastion of public access to information, is <a
href="http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/12/why-the-library-of-congress-is-blocking-wikileaks/">blocking</a>
        WikiLeaks. </p>
      <p>There has been a tremendous backlash against WikiLeaks from
        governments around the world. In the United States, lawmakers
        have rashly <a
href="http://ensign.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?ContentRecord_id=a908e152-c766-a798-abd5-07da74b197b3&FuseAction=Media.PressReleases">proposed
          a law</a> that <a
          href="http://www.lawfareblog.com/2010/12/espionage-act-amendments/">threatens</a>
        legitimate news reporting well beyond WikiLeaks. We expect to
        see similar efforts in other countries. Like it or not,
        WikiLeaks has become the emblem for one of the most important
        battles for our rights that is likely to come along in our
        lifetimes. We cannot sit this one out.</p>
      <h3><a
          href="https://www.eff.org/pages/say-no-to-online-censorship">Join
          EFF in standing up against Internet censorship</a>.</h3>
      <p> Download our <a
          href="https://www.eff.org/pages/say-no-to-online-censorship">No
          Censorship button</a> to display on your websites and social
        networking profiles. Show the world that you are committed to
        free expression and denounce censorship.</p>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>