<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#333333" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<font face="sans-serif">if this is about giving 48 hours for the
consensus call, I dont see why we cant do it.... We can submit the
statement after 48 hours. I am very hopeful that the CSTD secretariat
will accommodate such a request </font>form the IGC. parminder <br>
<br>
On Friday 19 November 2010 06:27 PM, McTim wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTinGKqJY=LVfumFexkFnDD0wYOYBws=QoLDDOPX4@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">i agree with bill on all points. Rgds, mctim
On 11/19/10, William Drake <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch"><william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:45 PM, parminder wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">What I cant understand is the position of those who both oppose the EC
process (in whichever evolutionary form) as well as oppose possibilities
of the IGF making recommendations (I see Wolfgang, Katitza, Bill, Jeanette
among others state that position). Moreover, they all seem to closely
associate with OECD/ CoE policy making processes, which are in fact much
less open, transparent, multistakeholder etc than even the 'enhanced
cooperation' model which, for instance, I proposed and they strongly
resisted.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Interesting. But I have never said I oppose enhanced cooperation. I have
said I prefer recommendations from the IGF to recs of the IGF, which will
not work. I am not closely associated with the OECD. I don't think it
makes sense to advocate a Global Internet Council until someone can
convincingly explain why it is needed, how it would operate, and why it
would not end up being like what the caucus rejected during the WGIG period.
On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Lee W McKnight wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Yes from me too...let's see if we can reach a 'rough consensus' amongst
ourselves at least.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I don't know who the selves in question are, but this needs to follow the
procedures for consensus calls we agreed in the charter.
Cheers,
Bill
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>