<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;font-size:10pt"><div>Hmmm. What great pause that gives. First I must consider the source. Was it from thoughtful philosophy or was it from bureaucrats?</div><div><br></div><div>One must be aware that taking out the main concept and adding a group that completely changes the primary Idea is noteworthy.</div><div><br></div><div>What does it mean to direct a policy to get the "best and most knowledgeable minds in civil society together" in order to "improve and guide the setting of Internet Governance and to advise and recommend best practices" and then to have some non-qualified in the subject matter determine the focus of debate.</div><div><br></div><div>I believe this is exactly what Jefsey and Karl have been so patiently explaining to us on the list. Clearly we are being told to
support the existing regimes and not to stray from the status quo. After all a revolutionary concept is just the changing of the dominion of thought and control.</div><div><br></div><div>Rather than a "they" or a "committee" can someone reveal just who directed the dropping of the word and the adding of the group???</div><div style="position:fixed"></div>
</div></body></html>