Hi Salanieta,<br><br>Have attached a copy of the case. <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 April 2010 19:28, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Thanks Keerti. Do you have a copy of the Judgment?<br>
<br>
Sala<br>
<div class="im">On 4/7/10, Keerti Nagappa <<a href="mailto:keerti.nagappa@gmail.com">keerti.nagappa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> A federal appeals court (US) has ruled that the Federal<br>
> Communications Commission (FCC)lacks the authority to require<br>
> broadband providers to give equal treatment to all Internet<br>
> traffic flowing over their networks.<br>
><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/technology/07net.html?hp" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/technology/07net.html?hp</a><br>
><br>
</div>> *Court Rules Against F.C.C. in ‘Net Neutrality’ Case*<br>
> <<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/technology&pos=Frame4A&sn2=d59993d0/2e9a4d4e&sn1=54576ea3/a621c698&camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225557c_nyt5&ad=ch_02_120x60anim_10k&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fcrazyheart" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/technology&pos=Frame4A&sn2=d59993d0/2e9a4d4e&sn1=54576ea3/a621c698&camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225557c_nyt5&ad=ch_02_120x60anim_10k&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fcrazyheart</a>><br>

<div class="im">><br>
> WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court has ruled that the Federal<br>
> Communications<br>
</div>> Commission<<a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/federal_communications_commission/index.html?inline=nyt-org" target="_blank">http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/federal_communications_commission/index.html?inline=nyt-org</a>>lacks<br>

<div class="im">> the authority to require broadband providers to give equal treatment<br>
> to all Internet traffic flowing over their networks.<br>
><br>
> Tuesday’s ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of<br>
> Columbia is a big victory for the Comcast<br>
</div>> Corporation<<a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/comcast_corporation/index.html?inline=nyt-org" target="_blank">http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/comcast_corporation/index.html?inline=nyt-org</a>>,<br>

<div class="im">> the nation’s largest cable company. It had challenged the FCC’s authority to<br>
> impose so called “net<br>
</div>> neutrality<<a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/net_neutrality/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" target="_blank">http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/net_neutrality/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier</a>>”<br>

<div class="im">> obligations.<br>
><br>
> It marks a serious setback for the F.C.C., which needs authority to regulate<br>
> the Internet in order to push ahead with key parts of its national broadband<br>
> plan.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Keerti Nagappa<br>
> LLM Candidate 2010<br>
> University of California,<br>
> Berkeley School of Law<br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>--<br>
Salanieta Tudrau Tamanikaiwaimaro<br>
P.O.Box 17862<br>
Suva<br>
Fiji Islands<br>
<br>
Cell: +679 9982851<br>
Alternate Email: <a href="mailto:s.tamanikaiwaimaro@tfl.com.fj">s.tamanikaiwaimaro@tfl.com.fj</a><br>
<br>
"Wisdom is far better than riches."<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Keerti Nagappa<br>LLM Candidate 2010<br>University of California, <br>Berkeley School of Law<br><br>