<div>Dear all,</div><div><br></div><div>Irrespective of my previous comment on Parminder's analysis of the motivation of governments, Yrjö has a very valid point : Parminder's document is shorter and more direct. Probably better as a base to work from. Sometimes, less is more. Bill also mentions rightly that there is no real urgency. </div>
<div><br></div><div>The key point is indeed : "Desirability of the continuation of the IGF" can certainly be qualified as a WSIS-follow-up question. Not respecting the normal process for WSIS follow-up issues (ie : the circuit : CSTD, ECOSOC, UN GA) should be justified by fact-based reasons. None has been provided so far and the option that is envisaged has two clear drawbacks :</div>
<div>- it prevents fruitful interactions that can take place in the CSTD - and there only</div><div>- the ECOSOC cannot send the report back to the CSTD (like it did on enhanced cooperation) because a decision must be taken before the end of this year.</div>
<div><br></div><div>In any case, as mentioned in the previous post, the key question for the UN GA should be Yes or No, as the question is "desirability of the continuation". </div><div><br></div><div>Best</div>
<div><br></div><div>Bertrand </div><div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Yrjö Länsipuro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yrjo_lansipuro@hotmail.com" target="_blank">yrjo_lansipuro@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
I could certainly live with all alternatives we are now discussing. They all convey the same message, with different emphasis on our main points.<div><br></div><div>I'm quite attracted by Parminder's new text, because it is short and starts from the fact that many governments already opposed cutting out the CSTD. This way, joining our voices with other stakeholders, our statement might carry more weight than otherwise. </div>
<div><br></div><div>However, maybe I'm biased, having worn the government hat for so long...</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Yrjö</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div><div> </div><div><br>> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:34:52 +0000<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu" target="_blank">jeanette@wzb.eu</a><br>> To: <a href="mailto:jeremy@ciroap.org" target="_blank">jeremy@ciroap.org</a><br>> CC: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>; <a href="mailto:williams.deirdre@gmail.com" target="_blank">williams.deirdre@gmail.com</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [governance] REVISION 3 Draft statement to UNSG on bypassing<div><div></div><div><br>> <br>> Hi again,<br>> <br>> I agree with Deidre that we shouldn't use a statement to explain <br>
> matters. Particularly, we shouldn't explain UN procedures including <br>> timing in a statement to the UNSG. Therefore, I would take only the <br>> following para from Parminder's text and integrate it, perhaps after <br>
> rewriting it a bit to make it sound polite:<br>> <br>> We therefore request that in the interest of an open and transparent <br>> process, UN Secretary General's report on continuation of the IGF be <br>
> made available to the CSTD's annual session in May 2010, which will help <br>> the 'UN membership' make an informed and considered decision on this <br>> matter as per the requirements of the Tunis Agenda.<br>
> <br>> jeanette<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<br>> > On 18/02/2010, at 7:04 PM, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:<br>> > <br>> >> I support Deidre's reasoning (for dropping para 5) and her suggestions.<br>
> > <br>> > Then we have you and Deirdre who don't want paragraph 5 and Yrjö, Wolfgang et al who do.<br>> > <br>> > We also have Parminder who has contributed a completely different text (and I don't think there's any point in integrating it with the existing text, because it's written as a complete alternative).<br>
> > <br>> > I now need to know what each of you can live with. Jeanette and Deirdre, could you live with paragraph 5? Others, could you live with losing it?<br>> > <br>> > All, could you live with Parminder's draft instead of the one we've been discussing, or Parminder could you live with the original one?<br>
> > <br>> ____________________________________________________________<br>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>> <a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>> <br>> For all list information and functions, see:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>> <br>> Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
</div></div></div></div><div> <br><hr>Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. <a href="https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969" target="_blank">Sign up now.</a></div></div>
<br>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>____________________<br>Bertrand de La Chapelle<br>
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the Information Society<br>Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs<br>Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32<br>
<br>"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry<br>("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")<br>
</div>