<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">This was a statement for civil society participants at the OECD Ministerial Meeting on the Future of the Internet Economy. <div>Signatures endorsing the statement are available here:<div><a href="http://thepublicvoice.org/events/seoul08/signatures.pdf">http://thepublicvoice.org/events/seoul08/signatures.pdf</a></div><div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Feb 7, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><p><b>Greetings</b></p><p><b>I am pleased to copy below the Civil Society Statement issues for the OECD Ministerial Meeting on the Future of the Internet. This statement makes clear that Civil Society Agenda is a Human Rights Agenda (in reply to Yehuda).</b></p><p><b>The original text is available here: <a href="http://csisac.org/seoul.php">http://csisac.org/seoul.php</a></b></p><p><b>I have tweak the text a little to show that all those issues is under the Human Rights Umbrella. </b></p><p><strong>A BROAD FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET </strong></p><p>The policy goals for the Future Internet should be considered within the broader framework of protection of human rights, the promotion of democratic institutions, access to information, and the provision of affordable and non-discriminatory access to advanced communication networks and services. Compliance with international human rights standards and respect for the rule of law, as well as effective human rights protection, must be the baseline for assessing global information society policies. Economic growth should be for the many and not the few. The Internet should be available to all. We therefore call attention of all the stakeholder to the following civil society priorities, and we make the following recommendations:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Freedom of expression. </strong>Freedom of expression is being violated around the globe by state censorship and by more subtle measures such as content filtering, privatized censorship and restrictions on so-called “harmful content.” We urge all stakeholder to defend freedom of expression and to oppose mandated filtering, censorship of Internet content, and criminalization of content that is protected under international freedom of expression standards.</li> <li><strong>Protection of Privacy and Transparency.</strong> We reaffirm our support for the OECD Privacy Guidelines as a fundamental policy instrument setting out minimal requirements for the transborder flow of personal data. We call countries to adopt and enforce data protection laws covering all sectors, both online and offline, and to establish international data protection standards that are legally enforceable. We further urge member states to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability for all data processing for border security, identification, and decision-making concerning individuals. </li> <li><strong>Consumer Protection.</strong> Trust and confidence are critical to the success of the Internet economy. The OECD should ensure that consumer protection laws are properly enforced and cover digital products to the same extent that other consumer goods and services are covered. We recommend that the OECD adopt the policy proposals on Empowering Consumers in Communications Services and in Mobile Commerce as Council Recommendations, and that the OECD member countries implement these recommendations. We support the OECD’s efforts to facilitate cross- border enforcement of anti-spam laws and to develop effective online dispute resolution mechanisms.</li> <li><strong>Employment, Decent Work and Skills. </strong>We recommend that OECD Member countries promote learning and training opportunities for workers and address the technological and organizational change in the workplace. We further urge the OECD to lower the carbon footprint of the ICT industry and to promote compliance with core labor standards and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.</li> <li><strong>Promotion of Access to Knowledge.</strong> countries should oppose extensions of copyright terms and private ownership of essential knowledge and cultural information that can be made available on the Internet. We recommend to discuss the importance of copyright exceptions for education, libraries and archives, the disability community, and new innovative services.</li> <li><strong>Internet Governance. </strong> Internet governance structures should reflect democratic values and be transparent and publicly accountable to users. Global Internet policymaking should involve equal participation of all people, countries, and stakeholders.</li> <li><strong>Promotion of Open Standards and Net Neutrality.</strong> Standards-making processes should be open and should encourage competition. This promotes innovation and development. We support the procurement policies that promote open standards, open data formats, and free and open software. We further recommend Countries oppose discrimination by network providers against particular applications, devices, or content and preserve the Internet's role in fostering innovation, economic growth, and democratic communication.</li> <li><strong>Balanced Intellectual Property Policies.</strong> We urge t countries to maintain a balanced framework for intellectual property protection that is least intrusive to personal privacy, least restrictive for the development of new technologies, and that promotes creativity, innovation, and learning. Countries should oppose proposals that would deny individuals access to all Internet services and opportunities based on alleged copyright infringement. We are also concerned about the secrecy of the "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement" (ACTA) treaty process and the possibility of policies that may limit legitimate business activity, the participative web, and e-government service delivery.</li> <li><strong>Support for Pluralistic Media.</strong> The Internet is a universal platform for innovation, growth, and the ability of people to express and share their views. New forms of media and new applications are emerging that challenge old paradigms and enable broader public participation. At the same time, dominant Internet firms are moving to consolidate their control over the Internet. It is vitally important that countries develop a better understanding of the challenge industry consolidations pose to the open Internet. </li> <li><strong>Inclusive Digital Society.</strong> The Internet should be accessible to all. Countries should ensure that all residents have the means to access the Internet and should provide public Internet access, training and support. Particular attention should be paid to rural, remote and aboriginal populations, as well as the disability community.</li> <li><strong>Cultural Diversity.</strong> We support the efforts of the members countries to promote access to the full range of the world's cultures and to ensure that the Internet economy reflects the true diversity of language, art, science, and literature in our world. The deployment of International Domain Names should be a priority.</li></ul><div><br></div><div><div>On Feb 7, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>IMO - Ginger has placed a last minute 'Bait-N-Switch' disguised for the HR<br>agenda.<br>It has no place in the OC-IGF meeting or IGF, the UNSG has pleanty of Agencys*<br>which handel Human Rights issues with plenty of Forum. <br><br>At best to my opinion the: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for<br>Human Rights** is the proper place to seek venue of which Ginger et.al. is<br>seeking.<br><br>The IGF platform is not the proper venue for HR. The consquences of tableing<br>the HR agenda with the MAG (UNSG etc...) could result in the ITU receiving the<br>ballance of power in regards to the IGF. It is a risk that does not need to be<br>taken by the IGC.<br><br>Drop it.<br><br>-<br><br>*<br><a href="http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/UN-inter-agency-links.htm">http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/UN-inter-agency-links.htm</a><br><br>** <a href="http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/UN-inter-agency.htm">http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/UN-inter-agency.htm</a><br>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br><br>For all list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br><br>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br><br>For all list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br><br>Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></body></html>