<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [governance] Re: Separate statement on themes for Vilnius</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>I’d certainly like to see network neutrality/ open internet advanced as a theme, and seeing net neutrality can be so confusing I’d like to see open Internet added after it.<BR>
<BR>
IGC co sponsored a very successful three hour workshop on this at Sharm with Diplo. There are many issues, content neutrality probably sitting highest in my mind. Its worthy of a main session as the current main session themes we have repeated for some years are getting a little tired. <BR>
<BR>
And yes we should continue to support the human rights and development agendas. We need to find a way to overcome the block on rights discussions which was evident last year – if anyone has suggestions on how we might achieve this I would be interested.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="95%"><B>From: </B>Jeremy Malcolm <<a href="jeremy@ciroap.org">jeremy@ciroap.org</a>><BR>
<B>Reply-To: </B><<a href="governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>>, Jeremy Malcolm <<a href="jeremy@ciroap.org">jeremy@ciroap.org</a>><BR>
<B>Date: </B>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:40:27 +0800<BR>
<B>To: </B><<a href="governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>><BR>
<B>Subject: </B>[governance] Re: Separate statement on themes for Vilnius<BR>
<BR>
On 29/01/2010, at 6:47 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>So, let's get to work on such a statement now. I don't think it needs to be very long, and indeed we could just put forward some bullet points for Ginger to elaborate upon on the day. So far we have on the table the following substantive themes:<BR>
<BR>
* Human rights<BR>
* Development agenda<BR>
* Network neutrality/Open Internet<BR>
<BR>
Comments, please, particularly on the last of these which Parminder has just introduced?<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
With just over a week to go there have still been no comments on this thread so far, so I will try to summarise some of the arguments that are usually made for and against this theme, as a way of kick-starting discussion:<BR>
<BR>
FOR:<BR>
<BR>
Network neutrality (or "open Internet") emphasises the interest of Internet users in being able, by default, to access content, services and applications free from corporate or governmental interference (though there are cases in which compelling interests may require exceptions to this general principle). Network neutrality also stands for the treatment of intermediaries (again, by default) as conduits for information, rather than gatekeepers who bear liability for the content they carry.<BR>
<BR>
AGAINST:<BR>
<BR>
Network neutrality is a confusing phrase with many different meanings to different people. For example it is still wrongly thought of as preventing individual network operators from managing their bandwidth, which will only lead to misunderstandings in Vilnius (like the arguments over whether "critical Internet resources" includes electricity). On the other hand "Open Internet" doesn't seem to add anything to the existing "Openness" theme, so why not just keep using that existing theme instead? <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="1"><FONT FACE="Helvetica, Verdana, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:9pt'>-- <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><B>Jeremy Malcolm<BR>
Project Coordinator<BR>
</B></SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT COLOR="#808080"><FONT SIZE="1"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:9pt'>Consumers International<BR>
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East<BR>
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia<BR>
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#CC9900"><FONT SIZE="2"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><B>CI is 50<BR>
</B></SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#993366"><FONT SIZE="1"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:9pt'>Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in 2010.<BR>
Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer rights around the world. <BR>
<U><a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/50">http://www.consumersinternational.org/50</a></U></SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="1"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:9pt'><U><FONT COLOR="#0000FF"> <<a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/50">http://www.consumersinternational.org/50</a>> <BR>
</FONT></U></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT COLOR="#999999"><FONT SIZE="1"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:8pt'>Read our email confidentiality notice</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="1"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:8pt'><FONT COLOR="#0000FF"> <<a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=100521&int1stParentNodeID=89765">http://www.consumersinternational.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=100521&int1stParentNodeID=89765</a>> </FONT><FONT COLOR="#999999">. Don't print this email unless necessary.<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="95%"></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Consolas, Courier New, Courier"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>____________________________________________________________<BR>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR>
<a href="governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><BR>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR>
<a href="governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><BR>
<BR>
For all list information and functions, see:<BR>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><BR>
<BR>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>