<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Verdana">Hi Eric,<br>
<br>
You are free to make a formal complaint about Parminder's post by
private email or on the list. In that case, the complaint will be
reviewed by a small advisory group, and a decision will be made. Either
party (you or Parminder, for example) could then appeal that decision
to the Appeals Committee.<br>
<br>
This is the same procedure that was followed recently when there was a
formal complaint alleging that you made an <i>ad hominem</i> attack on
Wolfgang. In that case, you were censured, not censored. <br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Ginger<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font><br>
Eric Dierker wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:232828.33364.qm@web83911.mail.sp1.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td
style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;"
valign="top">
<div>What up here Ginger? This Parminder directly attacks
Roland and specifically calls what he is doing bad, this is Rolands
livelyhood so it is definate defamation if not true. Why when I use
the same concept far more abstractly. am I called on the carpet -- but
not Parminder???</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I think you should retract your censorship of me. I think
that your attempt to curtail my participation and not Parminder shows
just how innappropriate censorship is.<br>
<br>
--- On <b>Wed, 1/27/10, Parminder <i><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net"><parminder@itforchange.net></a></i></b>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"><br>
From: Parminder <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net"><parminder@itforchange.net></a><br>
Subject: Re: [governance] IGC statement FINAL VERSION<br>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>, "Roland Perry"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:roland@internetpolicyagency.com"><roland@internetpolicyagency.com></a><br>
Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 6:04 PM<br>
<br>
<div class="plainMail"><br>
<br>
Roland Perry wrote:<br>
> In message <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=4B602988.8030603@wzb.eu"
ymailto="mailto:4B602988.8030603@wzb.eu">4B602988.8030603@wzb.eu</a>>,
at 11:54:48 on Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Jeanette Hofmann <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jeanette@wzb.eu"
ymailto="mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu">jeanette@wzb.eu</a>> writes<br>
>> I don't think it is a good idea to renegotiate the agenda two
months before an IGF meeting. It is neither possible to invite speakers
nor to arrange workshops around main sessions if the last MAG meeting
before the IGF may revise the agenda.<br>
> <br>
> Which is exactly why I have earlier suggested that having a MAG
meeting (rather than another September09-ish meeting) in July 2010 is a
bad idea.<br>
<br>
Let us tie our hands, lest we do something wrong!<br>
<br>
This just comes from lack of faith in governance processes. Why would
we think that a MAG like group will be so stupid as to go about doing
stuff that is not in the best interest of the IGF?<br>
<br>
Why then, lets not have any MAG and even any IGF at all, who knows what
they may come up with and upset happily settled apple carts.<br>
<br>
(No one really spoke about 'renegotiating' agenda at the last moment!
Did anyone. So this rhetoric is unnecessary and distracting. Only about
fine-tuning language, getting closer to specific topics/ policy
questions, deciding things about structural evolutions, detailing
agenda for moderators etc, anything that may need a last minute
decision - why preempt? And also why such an eagerness to forget that
it is not only the third meeting we are speaking about dispensing with
here, but also the second!!)<br>
<br>
Parminder<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org"
ymailto="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org"
ymailto="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>