<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<pre wrap="">McTim: "I think that our submission will not be ignored even if late."
Not only can it be submitted late, (although then it might not be included in the Synthesis Paper) it can and should be read aloud during the OC meeting.
It is important to take the necessary time to discuss this statement and reach consensus.
This is an important process. It is what the IGC is meant to do. Keep up the good work everybody!!!
Best, Ginger
</pre>
<br>
<br>
McTim wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:f65fb55e1001151215n78d9ac6cx8a79e2a4f7258378@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:isolatedn@gmail.com"><isolatedn@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello Oliver,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ocl@gih.com"><ocl@gih.com></a>
wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Jeremy,
Le 15/01/2010 17:46, Jeremy Malcolm a écrit :
Submission of the IGC in taking stock of the Sharm el Sheikh meeting of
the IGF
We thank you for the opportunity to present you with these thoughts, which
reflect a "rough consensus" of our several hundred members from civil
society, with a wide spread of geographic and gender representation. We
look forward to continuing to constructively engage with and participate in
the IGF over the course of its renewed term.
About the IGC
The IGC is an association of individuals in civil society who are actively
engaged in internet governance and the IGF. Formed during the lead up to the
World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), our mission is to promote
global public interest objectives in Internet governance policy making. It
now comprises more than 400 individual subscribers to its mailing list, who
have subscribed to its Charter. More about our coalition can be found at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.igcaucus.org">http://www.igcaucus.org</a>.
Thank you for writing this statement but I am really sorry - I *strongly*
object to the statement as it is currently phrased.
Okay - I'm not sure whether I am "allowed" to be saying this, but whilst I
think that your writing style and ability is impeccable, and whilst I agree
with some of the points developed, I also need to point out that the
statements which make up this submission are seriously misleading about the
amount of support this statement has behind it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I agree with you on this observation.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
As do I.
In addition, our charter says: "The IGC will use its mailing list -
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>, as the priority working space.
Work shall also be done with the website : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.igcaucus.org">www.igcaucus.org</a>"
I do recall the questions were posted to the list. I don't recall
anyone saying "what a good idea, go ahead with that". Perhaps I
missed some mails over the holidays.
There does seem to be consensus to go para by para. I think that our
submission will not be ignored even if late.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>