<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>Ginger,</DIV>
<DIV>(I am just about rested up from western holidays -- Only to start up again with Chuc Mung Nam Moi -- and Tet)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I would like to see a set of ideals that we would propose for every occassion that would require a paper contribution. The occassions and sponsors and subject de jour can change but our overriding ideals should always be put forth::::: on the practical side we would always be ready and always plug (shamelessly I hope;-) our ideals.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. Seeking the highest levels of participation and contribution.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2. Consistency with the notion of individual rights.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3. Openness and transparency.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>4. Inclusive as is reasonable.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>5. As bottom up as is reliable.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>These are not particular goals or principles. They are just what we have seen time and time again help to prevent bad governance. In keeping with good mandate, we are best serving the Internet, and non-internet community by reminding others of these good ideas. Of course there are many more, but this can encompass all and is never repeated enough.<BR><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 1/11/10, Ginger Paque <I><gpaque@gmail.com></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Ginger Paque <gpaque@gmail.com><BR>Subject: [governance] Deadline for written Contributions to IGF<BR>To: "'governance@lists.cpsr.org'" <governance@lists.cpsr.org>, "Jeremy Malcolm" <jeremy@ciroap.org><BR>Date: Monday, January 11, 2010, 11:44 AM<BR><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1512854452><FONT face=Arial>Hello everyone,<BR>I hope everyone is back and energetic for a productive (happy, healthy) 2010.<BR><BR>Jeremy is still collating his efforts towards IGF reform, and will report as soon as he can.<BR><BR>On less complex topics, is there interest in a short IGC written contribution, for example:<BR>1. supporting rights and principles as an overarching theme<BR>2. workshop structure to include a remote participation moderator and some kind of pre-event training for remote participation.<BR><BR>Can we agree on a short concrete written contribution, or is it too short a time? Any thoughts?<BR><BR>Best,<BR>Ginger<BR></FONT></DIV><BR>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>____________________________________________________________<BR>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR> <A href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org" ymailto="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</A><BR>To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR> <A href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" ymailto="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</A><BR><BR>For all list information and functions, see:<BR> <A href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target=_blank>http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table>