<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Arial">I also agree. It is an excellent and important
point. Remember, not everyone interested in IG and IGF processes are
present at the IGF.<br>
Thanks!<br>
<br>
The Remote Participation options are excellent and there are some
Twitter feeds.<br>
<br>
If you are not in Egypt, you can still keep up.<br>
<br>
Best, Ginger<br>
</font><br>
Izumi AIZU wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:a5509d940911160221g6a4bc508s756164dae71ad34a@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I support this request.
izumi
2009/11/16 Ian Peter <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com"><ian.peter@ianpeter.com></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I think IGC should endorse this request. What do others think? As discussed
at our meeting, this review session appears as if it will not hear all
viewpoints people want to express and the extra comment period would allow
this to be redressed in some way.
On 16/11/09 4:20 PM, "Willie Currie" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:wcurrie@apc.org"><wcurrie@apc.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi all
We learned during the IGC meeting on Saturday that the number of
speakers at the Stocktaking session would be limited and that
governments would have precedence. Other stakeholders were asked to
cluster their inputs. At the MAG meeting on Saturday, it was made clear
that the UN secretariat would be running the session and would not take
comments after the session. Written comments can be made up to the session.
Because of these limitations I propose that we should make a request for
an additional three week comment period in the IGC statement to the
Stocktaking session. It's unclear if APC will be able to speak, but if
we can, we will make a similar request. We should also encourage other
academic and CS speakers to do the same. I understand ICC Basis will
also include a similar request.
Willie
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>
For all list information and functions, see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>
For all list information and functions, see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>