<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Nyangkwe and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> Unfortunately many in the west face the same ligitimacy considerations but perhaps to a lessor</P>
<P>degree, as you articulate is being faced or recognized in Africa. Ergo expecting assistance</P>
<P>from the west as you suggest may be a slippery slope and not generate the kind of assistance</P>
<P>you seem to be asking for.</P>
<P> </P>
<P> This said, Africa will need to solve it's own governmental ligitimacy problems and expect little</P>
<P>to no significant positive help from the west. Perhaps the EU can aid Africa in this regard, but</P>
<P>again some of the same ligitimacy problems exist or are precieved in the EU as well.<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Nyangkwe Agien Aaron <NYANGKWEAGIEN@GMAIL.COM><BR>Sent: Nov 15, 2009 3:21 AM <BR>To: governance@lists.cpsr.org, Lohento Ken <LOHENTO@ORIDEV.ORG><BR>Subject: Re: [governance] the IGF : what does it mean for Africa? <BR><BR>Hi All<BR><BR>Thanks Ken for the research<BR><BR>However:<BR><BR style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(102,255,255)"><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(102,255,255)">The involvement of the academia is laking, as well that of regional economic organizations (ECOWAS, SADC, etc.), maybe because governments seems less interested in the process.</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255)">This is due to the fact nearly all the governments of the regions are illigitimate and have less concern for issues that concern those governed<BR><BR></SPAN><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(51,255,255)">The mandate of the Forum (which is not seen as a space for solutions that Africa is urgently longing for), due to the basic access to ICT needs and to the crucial need to strengthen internet governance on the continent,</SPAN><BR><BR><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255)">You hit the nail square</SPAN> Ken. <BR>Capacity building is what is mostly needed here. Internet access dispite the availability of a down stream optical fibre that is not optimally exploited (nobody know why, may be reason is due my remarks above) <BR>May I say that after a Marshall plan to rebuild Europe after the second world war, we need an ICT plan for Africa that includes AN EFFECTIVE ROUTING OUT OF ILLIGIMATE GOVERNMENTS SUPPORTED BY THE WEST.<BR><BR>Best regards<BR><BR>Aaron <BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote><BR><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(102,255,255)"></SPAN>On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Lohento Ken <SPAN dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:lohento@oridev.org" target=_blank>lohento@oridev.org</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">Dear all,<BR><BR>One the eve of Egypt 2009, for your info, this article I wrote on the IGF and Africa - in French however, but please find a summary in English below - our list/caucus is somehow concerned - comments welcome - Regards KL<BR><BR>The Internet Governance Forum: what does it mean for Africa? - Octobre 2009 - working document in French - Download here <A href="http://www.iafric.net/benin/gouvernanceinternet.html" target=_blank>http://www.iafric.net/benin/gouvernanceinternet.html</A><BR><BR>SUMMARY<BR><BR>This article seeks to understand the representation and interest of the IGF process within the African ICT community, and to give illustrations of its eventual impact. To do this, we, primarily, have analyzed exchanges on two key discussion lists on which African views on Internet governance are conveyed. To complement and validate if necessary observations, we have consulted some documents produced by some players and have questioned others. We have also based conclusions on our observation of the process since its launch in 2006.<BR><BR>The two lists analyzed are a panAfrican list (the AfrICANN list, created by the AfriNIC, the body responsible for managing IP and ASN addresses for the continent) and an international list (the Governance list, a discussion space for the international civil society Internet Governance Caucus). The first space was analyzed during six months (November 2008 - April 2009) and the second during a year (May 2008 - April 2009). These lists are two public lists, the most relevant for our analysis. It has been observed only 7% of contributions dealt with IGF on the AfrICANN in the period; this figure shows an interest in the international process, but it is minimal, on a space that gathered key African ICT governance players. However, as contributions on other subjects discussed on the list illustrates, Internet Governance as an issue is of a strong concern, specifically when it relates to its consolidation in Africa. “Localising IGF” has then become a common leitmotiv on the continent. From another point of view, 5.43% of the Internet Governance Caucus list came from African subscribers during the twelve months analyzed. This figure is at least below the continent's presence on this space (about 10%). However, it has to be stressed that Africa do contributes to life in this group at all levels, including during development of contributions submitted to IGF. On both lists, the feeble African participation that may be understood by several factors is regretted, by African stakeholders themselves first of all, and calls for reversing this trend are often made. All these conclusions are validated by the observation of the whole process, the analysis of some written productions and discussions with some key actors.<BR><BR>A main conclusion after this research is that, although Africa contributes and participates in IGF in different manners and for various reasons, its interest in the international process is minimal; this is due to the mandate of the Forum (which is not seen as a space for solutions that Africa is urgently longing for), due to the basic access to ICT needs and to the crucial need to strengthen internet governance on the continent, which is seen as a greater priority. In addition, the involvement of the academia is laking, as well that of regional economic organizations (ECOWAS, SADC, etc.), maybe because governments seems less interested in the process. The other main conclusion is that, capacity building for some African ICT actors, and the increased awareness on the importance of the multi-stakeholder approach in policy making the sector, are seen as the key advantages gained from the international process.<BR><BR>It is therefore crucial, in this period of mid-term “evaluation” of IGF, and some days before its fourth annual meeting organized in Africa, that mechanisms that support capacity building are strengthened and made more visible, if further enhancing the importance of the international process in the eyes of actors of the continent is an aim.<BR><BR>____________________________________________________________<BR>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR> <A href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target=_blank>governance@lists.cpsr.org</A><BR>To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR> <A href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target=_blank>governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</A><BR><BR>For all list information and functions, see:<BR> <A href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target=_blank>http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<P><BR><BR clear=all><BR>-- <BR>Aaron Agien Nyangkwe<BR>Journalist-OutCome Mapper<BR>Special Assistant The President<BR>ASAFE<BR>P.O.Box 5213<BR>Douala-Cameroon<BR><BR>Tel. 237 3337 55 31, 3337 50 22<BR>Fax. 237 3342 29 70<BR></P>
<P>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com<BR>Phone: 214-244-4827<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>