<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Arial">Lisa and all,<br>
I like this version much better (needs a final typo edit).<br>
<br>
Is it possible to include a specific reference to the UDHR?<br>
<br>
Thanks everyone for this effort. We are short on time, but we should
work to get a solid consensus in time for this statement to be included
at the OC next week.<br>
<br>
ginger<br>
</font><br>
Lisa Horner wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:43E4CB4D84F7434DB4539B0744B009A025C925@DATASRV.GLOBAL.local"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi all
I agree that the original wording was too sweeping, but also think that Meryem's point that it's not just governments who are the culprits is an important one. Companies are obviously involved in online censorship and privacy violations, whether wittingly or unwittingly, and many are pushing for overly restrictive copyright which can limit access to information and expression. Organisations and individuals who are involved in technological design and standard setting also need to be aware of their impact on the nature of communications technologies and whether they support or undermine human rights.
However, as has already been discussed, we need to strike a balance between a general, awareness-raising statement and being explicit enough so as not to confuse/mislead. How about:
"Fundamental human rights such as the rights to freedom of expression, privacy and education are threatened by some internet governance processes and practices. Of particular concern are the policies that many governments are pursuing at the national level."
New draft statement 3 pasted below, incorporating Meryem's suggestions about rights instruments.
Thanks,
Lisa
---------------------------------------
DRAFT STATEMENT (v.3)
The Caucus [and undersigned DCs] repeat their request that the programme for IGF-4 in Egypt gives the required attention to human rights. The WSIS Declaration and Tunis Agenda reaffirmed the centrality of human rights in the information society, but human rights and associated principles have received very little attention at the IGF so far. This is problematic as:
* Fundamental human rights such as the rights to freedom of expression, privacy and education are threatened by some internet governance processes and practices. Of particular concern are the policies that many governments are pursuing at the national level.
* The internet presents new opportunities for upholding and advancing human rights, for example through enhancing access to knowledge and resources. It is vital that we build on and enhance these opportunities.
* International human rights instruments are legally binding. Governments who have signed these covenants have a legal obligation and responsibility to uphold their citizens' human rights actively, in the Internet era as before.
* The human rights framework is an internationally agreed set of standards that has also has practical as well as ethical value. It balances different rights against each other to preserve individual and public interest. In addition to its legally binding implications, the framework is therefore a useful tool for addressing internet governance issues, such as how to deal with security concerns on the internet in compliance with the rights to freedom of expression and privacy. Besides stating the obligations of states and governments, the framework also allows us to derive the rights and responsibilities of other stakeholders.
The Internet Governance Caucus [and undersigned DCs] call for human rights standards to be included in the planning and implementation of all IGF sessions, so that they are given the attention they deserve as cross-cutting issues. This should include explicit consideration of how global, regional and national policies affect fundamental rights, and the development of positive policy principles to build an open and accessible internet for all. The Caucus [and undersigned DCs] would like to offer assistance to the organisers of the main plenary sessions to do this, and would like to support all stakeholders through providing access to relevant guidelines and experts.
-----Original Message-----
From: William Drake [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch">mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch</a>]
Sent: 08 September 2009 11:07
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>; Meryem Marzouki
Subject: Re: [governance] Statement by IGC supporting rights and principles
On Sep 8, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Meryem Marzouki wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Le 8 sept. 09 à 11:38, William Drake a écrit :
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Meryem,
On Sep 8, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Meryem Marzouki wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Such a short statement, which purpose is to put the HR issue on
the table at IGF -- and nothing more -- should remain general
enough.
If there is real and shared insistance that the sentence be
watered down, then we could says "... threatened by SOME current
IG processes and practice". Although this seems obvious..
Finally, a statement should be read in its globality. The final
paragraph mentions "global, regional and national policiies",
showing that the statement makes a difference between these
policies at different levels.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">My suggestion pertained to the examples Ginger gave, which were of
national level government censorship. If you'd like to suggest
more encompassing yet differentiated language and try to get
consensus on it feel free, but as McTim notes, "are threatened by
current internet governance processes and practice" seems too
sweepingly totalizing.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">If it seems totalizing, then let's make sure there is no
misunderstanding, and have the statement simply says "... threatened
by SOME OF THE current IG processes and practice". Is that agreeable
to you and Mc Tim?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Sure it's agreeable, but I doubt it ensures there'll be no
misunderstanding.
Cheers,
Bill____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>
For all list information and functions, see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a>
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4404 (20090907) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a>
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4405 (20090908) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.eset.com">http://www.eset.com</a>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>
For all list information and functions, see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>