Dear All<br><br>My earlier email refers (CCd only to involved parties).<br><br>I apologise for wrongly attributing to Eric emails CCd to me, whereas I was referring to Joe Baptista. In the email I did in fact email the list AND (and only) Joe, BUT in the body of the email errouneously referred to Eric and thereafter the name stuck in my mind and I repeated the error. I do apologise to Eric for any inconvenience caused.<br>
<br>I am conveyed that to Eric in a reply to an email from him on that subject. <br><br>I would however like to refer to my earlier email below and include a point 5 that reads as follows:<br><br>5. Using the "Reply to All" function, therefore emailing a former poster's personally CC'd recipients shall equally contitute an act of unsilicited emailing, i.e., spam. Put differently, if a member of the list decides to CC any of his acquaintances, that does not entitle another member to include those members in his/ her reply/ comment/ reaction.<br>
<br>Please read points 1 to 4 below (taking into account that the name Eric in fact refers to Joe: <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Rui Correia</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:correia.rui@gmail.com">correia.rui@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
Date: 2009/8/20<br>Subject: List Posting Rules: Unsolicited CCing is SPAM [was Stop CCing me]<br>To: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <<a href="mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com">jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com</a>>, <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br><br>Jeffrey and Eric<br><br>Apologies to others, but this is pertinent as we are now engaged in the exercise of redefining list participation rules. <br><br>1. I am a subscriber to the list, therefore there is no need to CC me or any other subscriber.<br>
2. Email that is sent unsolicited is the primary criterion of what constitutes spam. Sending spam is against the current rules (and the proposed new rules). You are therefore in breach of the rules. The recipient informing the sender that the mail is unwelcome merely constitutes an aggraving factor.<br>
3. Any one is free to further disseminate list debates/ discussions to external interested parties by means of CC/ BCC/ FWD whenever one has reason to believe that the recipient(s) will welcome receiving such posting(s). <br>
4. Depending on applicability, anyone resorting to CCing when that person's posting rights have been suspended is guilty of contravening the suspension. <br><br>In view of the above, I am asking you one last time - STOP CCing me.<br>
<br>I trust that the above is in order.<br><br>Rui<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/8/20 Jeffrey A. Williams <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com" target="_blank">jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<p>Rui and all,</p>
<p> </p>
<p> I would think that the IGC/IGF would welcome anyone to the discussion that is CC'ed if the discussion</p>
<p>is open and transparent in accordance with UN and IGC charter. After all the issues discussed are of,</p>
<p>or do directly or indirectly the global public do they not?<br><br><br></p>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 0px;"><div><div></div><div>-----Original Message----- <br>From: Rui Correia <br>Sent: Aug 19, 2009 8:22 AM <br>To: Joe Baptista , <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a> <br>
Subject: Re: STOP CCing me: [was Child Porn in Internet governance Re: [governance] Monroe Doctrin for Cyberspace?] <br><br>Dear Joe<br><br>I know how the list works. However, you will see that whenever Eric posts, he adds a whole range of people to the CC field - whether you have been part of a discussion or not.<br>
<br>Regards,<br><br>Rui <br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2009/8/19 Joe Baptista <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:baptista@publicroot.org" target="_blank">baptista@publicroot.org</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi Rui:<br><br>I don't think Eric cced you. In any case - that is the nature of this list. The problem is in the reply-to headers. When one replies to the list the cc is automatic - as in this case when I reply to all. If you just reply - the response goes directly to the poster and not the list.<br>
<br>Hope that clarifies the issue for you. The best way to fix this is to ensure the reply-to governance bit is set and that control is with the list admins - not with me.<br><br>regards<br>joe baptista
<div>
<div></div>
<div><br><br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/19/09, <b class="gmail_sendername">Rui Correia</b> <<a href="mailto:correia.rui@gmail.com" target="_blank">correia.rui@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear Eric<br><br>I've been on the governance list since its inception - there really is no need for you to cc me - and possibly others - when you post to the list. Your gesture is duly acknowledged, but really not necessary.<br>
<br>Yours<br><br>Rui <br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2009/8/19 Joe Baptista <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:baptista@publicroot.org" target="_blank">baptista@publicroot.org</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/18/09, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jeffrey A. Williams</b> <<a href="mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com" target="_blank">jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<p>act childish in the seeking of internet governance, which is why at present Internet Governance is a child.</p></div></blockquote>
<div><br></div></div>No - I would not say child. More like a prepubescent teenager. The education process is at best very slow. I think I have returned to this reasoning on a numerous occasions. Many people involved in internet governance have no idea what the Internet is. They know the buzz - believe the fiction and completely miss the point and are amazed to find out the Internet is very dangerous. I was the first to point that out in 1995 - <a href="http://bit.ly/Rp0fB" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/Rp0fB</a> - and time has proved me correct on this.<br>
<br>If Internet governance people had any idea just how dangerous the Internet always was - is and will be more so as time passes and protocol evolves - then they would be seeking less government reliance on the internet and they would be warning people on the dangers awaiting them. Most of the infrastructure is completely insecure. DNS over UDP is a mess - DNSSEC a public relations disaster. And thats just two little protocols.<br>
<br>This is an example of a child porn issue. If people here are serious about protecting children from predators and porn on the Internet then ask legislative assmblies to legislate children off the Internet. The only way to protect them is by cutting the source of the danger.<br>
<br>Unfortunately - as I said what I see of Internet governance here is more wide eyed teenagers. All full of hope but completely unaware of the dangers. It takes time to grow up - or else become irrelevant - tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur en illis.<br>
<br>regards<br><font color="#888888">joe baptista<br>Personal: <a href="http://www.joebaptista.wordpress.com" target="_blank">www.joebaptista.wordpress.com</a> </font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>________________________________________________<br>
<br><br>Rui Correia<br>Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Consultant<br>2 Cutten St<br>Horison <br>Roodepoort-Johannesburg, <br>South Africa<br>Tel/ Fax (+27-11) 766-4336<br>Mobile (+27) (0) 84-498-6838<br>_______________<br>
áâãçéêíóôõúç<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></div></div>-- <br>Joe Baptista<br><br><a href="http://www.publicroot.org" target="_blank">www.publicroot.org</a><br>PublicRoot Consortium<br>----------------------------------------------------------------<br>
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.<br>----------------------------------------------------------------<br> Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)<br>
Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
<div>
<div></div>
<div><br><br>Personal: <a href="http://www.joebaptista.wordpress.com" target="_blank">www.joebaptista.wordpress.com</a> </div></div></blockquote></div>
<p><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>________________________________________________<br><br><br>Rui Correia<br>Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Consultant<br>2 Cutten St<br>Horison <br>Roodepoort-Johannesburg, <br>
South Africa<br>Tel/ Fax (+27-11) 766-4336<br>Mobile (+27) (0) 84-498-6838<br>_______________<br>áâãçéêíóôõúç<br></p>
</div></div><p>Regards,</p>
<p> </p>
<div>Jeffrey A. Williams<br>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders strong!)<br>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<br> Abraham Lincoln<br><br>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<br>
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<br><br>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<br>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<br>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<br>
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<br>===============================================================<br>Updated 1/26/04<br>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<br>
Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<br>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail <a href="mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com" target="_blank">jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com</a><br>Phone: 214-244-4827<br></div></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>________________________________________________<br> <br> <br>Rui Correia<br>Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Consultant<br>2 Cutten St<br>Horison <br>Roodepoort-Johannesburg, <br>
South Africa<br>Tel/ Fax (+27-11) 766-4336<br>Mobile (+27) (0) 84-498-6838<br>_______________<br>áâãçéêíóôõúç<br>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>________________________________________________<br> <br> <br>Rui Correia<br>Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Consultant<br>2 Cutten St<br>Horison <br>Roodepoort-Johannesburg, <br>
South Africa<br>Tel/ Fax (+27-11) 766-4336<br>Mobile (+27) (0) 84-498-6838<br>_______________<br>áâãçéêíóôõúç<br>