Eric says "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; "><i>America has never and most likely will never have any decrees. We do not run our rig that way</i>."</span><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><br>
</span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif">As one who also thinks and define my own existence from that action, I am truly surprised here. This could be the minority jaundiced view but I have never believed that ICANN would/could exist without substantive USG oversight. Given what I know of the US political order and with eyes wide open and mind engaged, it is unlikely. When the smoke clears, invoking the national security of the United States on any issue trumps all other considerations.</font></span></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms'" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif">Here we stand. If JPA - or by whatever name its replacement is finally implemented - is to go, I am opposed to a replacement of one suzerain power with another to the exclusion of the rest of us in the world.</font></span></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif"><br></font></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif">All this aside, the deed is done and the die is cast. I must and am willing to be proved wrong on this. </font></span></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif"><br></font></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif">Speaking of revisionism, historical and otherwise, I wonder in what context would we interpret [US presidential] executive orders? And what do you make of the instances where their execution have - by means fair and foul - imposed the American will elsewhere in the world? </font></span></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif"><br></font></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'comic sans ms', sans-serif">Carlton Samuels</font></span></font></div>
<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Eric Dierker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cogitoergosum@sbcglobal.net">cogitoergosum@sbcglobal.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" style="font:inherit"><div>I am concerned that with the JPA significant dates edging ever closer, this type of anti American revisionist history will become more prevalant. Let us hope not. Let us begin by making it known that innaccuracies such as this will be challenged.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>America has never and most likely will never have any decrees. We do not run our rig that way. Doctrines are a statement of intention by executives in governance, they are not law or treaty. The Monroe Doctrine is a statement against a <em>Holy Alliance</em> that threatened to reinstate colonialism. It was a statement to our lawmakers how the executive planned on dealing with others.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>All nations are allowed to make moves to secure their borders. Internet governance must accept and enjoy the cultural integrity that goes along with this forever necessity. All nations should feel confident and indeed plan for future independence regarding telecommunications. If the United States can effectively maintain and control access to information for other countries, it would be incumbent upon those countries to change that reliance.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><br><br>--- On <b>Sun, 7/19/09, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <i><<a href="mailto:isolatedn@gmail.com" target="_blank">isolatedn@gmail.com</a>></i></b> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote style="padding-left:5px;margin-left:5px;border-left:rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><br>From: Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <<a href="mailto:isolatedn@gmail.com" target="_blank">isolatedn@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [governance] Monroe Doctrin for Cyberspace?<br>
To: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>, "Vanda Scartezini" <<a href="mailto:vanda@uol.com.br" target="_blank">vanda@uol.com.br</a>><br>Cc: "Carlton Samuels" <<a href="mailto:carlton.samuels@uwimona.edu.jm" target="_blank">carlton.samuels@uwimona.edu.jm</a>>, ""Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"" <<a href="mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de" target="_blank">wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de</a>><br>
Date: Sunday, July 19, 2009, 1:10 PM<br><br>
<div>Hello All,<br><br>President James Monroe decreed in 1823 that any attempt to extend foreign political systems onto U.S. soil would be considered an act of aggression requiring U.S. intervention. This was essentially for national defense.<br>
<br>Mary Ann Davidson proposed to invoke the Doctrine" to put the world on notice that the <b>US has cyberturf,</b> and that we will defend our turf" It would be a distortion of this doctrine, if quoted to propose policies that would amount to no less than an US aggression of a space that it common to the whole world. What is proposed is the opposite of Monroe Doctrine in that sense. <br>
<br>Why would Oracle say this?<br><br>Sivasubramanian Muthusamy<br>Blog: <a href="http://isocmadras.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://isocmadras.blogspot.com</a><br><br>facebook: <a href="http://is.gd/x8Sh" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://is.gd/x8Sh</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a href="http://is.gd/x8U6" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://is.gd/x8U6</a><br>Twitter: <a href="http://is.gd/x8Vz" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://is.gd/x8Vz</a><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2009/7/19 Vanda Scartezini <span dir="ltr"><<a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vanda@uol.com.br" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">vanda@uol.com.br</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="padding-left:1ex;margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Carlton</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> I guess I could add many others examples to your comments. Lets not be naïve on this. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div><b><i><span lang="PT" style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)">Vanda Scartezini</span></i></b></div>
<div><b><i><span lang="PT" style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)">POLO Consultores Associados</span></i></b></div>
<div><b><i><span lang="PT" style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)">& IT Trend</span></i></b></div>
<div><b><i><span lang="PT" style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)">Alameda Santos 1470 cjs 1407/8</span></i></b></div>
<div><b><i><span lang="PT" style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)">01418-903 Sao Paulo,SP.</span></i></b></div>
<div><b><i><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)">Fone + 55 11 3266.6253</span></i></b></div>
<div><b><i><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)">Mob + 5511 8181.1464</span></i></b><i><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(49,132,155)"></span></i></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div>
<div style="border-right:rgb(181,196,223);padding-right:0in;border-top:rgb(181,196,223) 1pt solid;padding-left:0in;padding-bottom:0in;border-left:rgb(181,196,223);padding-top:3pt;border-bottom:rgb(181,196,223)">
<div><b><span style="font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt"> <a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=carlton.samuels@gmail.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">carlton.samuels@gmail.com</a> [mailto:<a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=carlton.samuels@gmail.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">carlton.samuels@gmail.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Carlton Samuels<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:39 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>; "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [governance] Monroe Doctrin for Cyberspace?</span></div></div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Um, see, history matters! Those of us on the periphery of empire can attest to that. <br><br>Seems I share some common reading material with Ms. Davidson. And while we read the same books, her worldview leads her to count all other actors in the space as merely collateral damage.<br>
<br>The Monroe Doctrine is an unfortunate metaphor applied to either cybersecurity or Internet governance. I shall take the most benign explanation and insist she is blithely unaware of the deleterious impact of the Monroe Doctrine on Latin America and the Caribbean. Honduras is just the latest gasp in a sorry history of an execrable policy that delivered "repeated injuries and usurpations greviously committed" and unilateral extraterritorial interventions resulting in stunted democratic institutions, mayhem and murder. Other stakeholders, the local people for one, were never recognized as having
worthwhile much less sovereign interests. She clearly does not know the true history of the United Fruit Company in Central America and other implementing tools of this doctrine. I won't even mention Haiti. <br>
<br>Let us be clear. The views expressed by Madame Reding of the EC inre ICANN-related Internet governance issues are merely more, well.....shall we say nuanced...as befits a better understanding of the sweep of history and its impact on the future.<br>
<br>History is not bunk. And culture is a helluva thing!<br><br>Carlton Samuels</span></p></div>
<div>
<div>2009/7/15 "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <<a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de</a>></div>
<div>Here is a good statement from Mary Ann Davidson, CSO from Oracle, where she proposes a "Monroe Doctrin" for Internet Governance. This is an extended version from a statement she made in a Congressional Hearing recently.<br>
<br>If somebody expected that we will soon the end of the IG debate, the contrary will be the case: The discussion has just started and the risk is, that all the new entrants in the discussion will probably not understand, what multistakeholderism is and why this has been an achievement for the diplomacy of the 1st decade of the 21st century. The 2nd decade could look rather different.<br>
<br>Wolfgang<br><br><a href="http://blogs.oracle.com/maryanndavidson/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://blogs.oracle.com/maryanndavidson/</a><br>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>For all list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a></div></div>
<div> </div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> <a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>For all list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br><br></div></blockquote><br><br>
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br><br>
<div>____________________________________________________________<br>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> <a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br><br>For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br></div></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote></div><br></div>