<div>After a day? I am right now going through a program with the Diplo foundation where my course instructor has assigned me two essay questions to be answered by noon tomorrow ! If I don't do that I will be ranked useless.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Sivasubramanian Muthusamy<br><br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ginger Paque <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gpaque@gmail.com">gpaque@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Shiva, great that you are addressing this question. Could you please synthesize your thoughts into a proposed text to answer Question 3? Thanks.<br>
<br>Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Hello,<br> 3. What has the impact of the IGF been in direct or indirect terms? Has it impacted you or your stakeholder group/institution/government? Has it acted as a catalyst for change?<br>
IGF, irrespective of its direct impact on the policy making process of Governments, is changing the way Government's perceive Civil Socity involvement in the policy making process. During the preparatory pahase as also during the last three IGFs, Governments had an opportunityh to experience the mutli-stakholder participatory process of the IGF and are becoming comfortable with the process of consultation. This 'roundtable' equality is largely an IGF achievement.<br>
As for the direct impact, it has been minimal. The policy making process has not sufficiently paid attention to the deliberations at the IGF. A point that I raised at the IGF session at the ICANN meeting may be relevant: <br>
(from the meeting transcript)<br> IGF does not have powers to decide, not have the powers to recommend.<br> But at the same time, 2,000 or 3,000 brilliant minds to get together.<br> These are people committed to Internet and they spend three days<br>
deliberating on various issues and there could be a way by which<br> session reports could be generated and positions of each stakeholder<br> could be classified and identified, grouped. And that could become<br> some kind of a reference paper. It could become a reference document<br>
for governments which could -- when it makes decisions, it could refer<br> to that paper, "This is the idea of paper on privacy. This is the<br> idea<br> of paper on security and what we want to do is in conflict with<br>
this or<br> in agreement with this." And that could guide them and may not<br> comfort<br> them, but it could be a very good reference paper that could give an<br> idea of what is happening in the real world. Right now the decisions are taken by government, by businesses in<br>
complete isolation of what is happening at the IGF and does not<br> reflect<br> the mood of the IGF.<br> So this is something that can be proactively done by the IGF<br> Secretariat to prepare summaries, prepare position papers and<br>
report on<br> the mood of IGF. Thank you.<br><br> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy<br>Sivasubramanian Muthusamy<br>Blog: <a href="http://isocmadras.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://isocmadras.blogspot.com</a><br> facebook: <a href="http://is.gd/x8Sh" target="_blank">http://is.gd/x8Sh</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a href="http://is.gd/x8U6" target="_blank">http://is.gd/x8U6</a><br>Twitter: <a href="http://is.gd/x8Vz" target="_blank">http://is.gd/x8Vz</a><br> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:<br>
<br> Hi, I support Bill's approach but would prefer if we didn't start<br> with all questions at the same time.<br> Perhaps an amended version of Ginger's text could be used for<br> question 6?<br> jeanette<br>
William Drake wrote:<br> <br> Hi Ginger<br> On Jul 8, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Ginger Paque wrote:<br> <br> Below is a combined proposal, mostly of Michael Gurstein's<br> and Garth Graham's previous suggestions:<br>
<br> My recollection is that about a half dozen of us expressed<br> significant concerns about that text and you then withdrew it,<br> so it's not obvious why we'd put it back on the table as a<br>
starting point. In any event it was not formulated as<br> responses to the secretariat's specific questions, so one<br> could not readily set it next to the questionnaire responses<br> by other stakeholders for comparison and contrast and<br>
development of the synthesis paper. Why not just do it the<br> way they're asking us to?<br> Since we don't have a wiki to compile structured responses, an<br> ugly but workable option would be to start a separate thread<br>
for each of the questions below, let any caucus members who<br> are so inclined respond to taste, then aggregate the responses<br> by Sunday and then we can try to boil them down into a few<br> coherent paragraphs per Monday-Wednesday?<br>
There might be more elegant procedures imaginable, but this<br> might stimulate some low barrier to entry engagement; I doubt<br> anyone's got the time to draft a complete text covering all<br>
points, but people might pick and choose the bits of<br> particular interest to them. And the result would be more<br> reflective of the various views here and more responsive to<br> the points the secretariat needs to address.<br>
Just a thought,<br> Bill<br> PS: you are using a very old email address for me that is no<br> longer forwarded.<br> <br> 1. To what extent has the IGF addressed the mandate set<br>
out for it in the Tunis Agenda?<br> 2. To what extent has the IGF embodied the WSIS principles?<br> 3. What has the impact of the IGF been in direct or<br> indirect terms? Has it impacted you or your stakeholder<br>
group/institution/government? Has it acted as a catalyst<br> for change?<br> 4. How effective are IGF processes in addressing the tasks<br> set out for it, including the functioning of the<br>
Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG), Secretariat and<br> open consultations?<br> 5. Is it desirable to continue the IGF past its initial<br> five-year mandate, and why/why not?<br>
6. If the continuation of the Forum is recommended, what<br> improvements would you suggest in terms of its working<br> methods, functioning and processes?<br> 7. Do you have any other comments?<br>
<br> ____________________________________________________________<br> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br> <mailto:<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br> <br> ____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br> <a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br> <mailto:<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br> <a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br> <br> <br></blockquote></blockquote>
</div><br>