<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi Parminder,<div><br><div><div>On Jun 7, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Parminder wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"><p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;"><font face="Arial, sans-serif"><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">I wonder if we can try and propose merger of our network neutrality workshop with another one on the same subject, and apply for a 3 hour slot. We can point to the fact that in at least one country (Norway) all stakeholders have been able to agree to set of NN principles, and it is worth making such efforts at the global level. At the least we can try to agree to some basic set of principles that flow flow from the defining characteristics of 'openness' and 'neutrality' of the Internet.</font></font></p></div></blockquote><br></div><div>I agree. We might want to consider widening the lens an little and placing NN in the context of the whole NGN trajectory, of which it is part and parcel. The issue is the telcos/manufacturers/ministries plans for the future of information infrastructure and the Internet by extension.</div><div><br></div><div><div>On Jun 7, 2009, at 7:29 AM, Parminder wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><br>It will be good to go through numerous statements on the IGF that the IGC has developed, including the recent one specifically on the subject of review, and pull out all key points from these. I think the current context and opportunity is to get as much of our perspective as possible into the synthesis paper on the comments on the subject of IGF review which will be presented to the IGF at its annual meeting. Our effort should be directed by this imperative. And since there is time till 15th July to give our comments to be included in this synthesis paper, we can pull out important elements from our earlier submissions, as well have a good discussion on the subject on the list.</font></div></blockquote><br></div><div>Saw this after replying to Ginger. We agree again :-) We have a month, let's do it right.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Bill</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br></div></body></html>