<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [governance] JPA - final draft for comments</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Bill, read all the comments – carefully. From my reading there is very little left if we take into account all comments received critical of various sections. I cannot find consensus text on either models or JPA, not acceptance of text which tries to accommodate differing beliefs. This leads me to believe that simpler and shorter is better. <BR>
<BR>
I am very happy for someone else to advance a draft of course!<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Ian<BR>
<BR>
On 3/06/09 7:24 PM, "William Drake" <william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Hi Ian,<BR>
<BR>
Looking over the recent comments, I'm not clear on why you think they require gutting the statement and simply endorsing generic principles that already apply to varying degrees. The prior text, if amended to take on board some tweaks that were suggested, seemed fairly balanced and accommodative of the various views expressed. <BR>
<BR>
Why are we tossing the work that was done?<BR>
<BR>
Best,<BR>
<BR>
Bill<BR>
<BR>
On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:52 PM, Ian Peter wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> Folks, having read the various responses, I think our only path forward is a much reduced response which concentrates on principles. So at this stage what I would propose for a consensus call in 24 hours or so is what follows. I would be happy however for someone else to suggest a wider ranging draft covering additional points, but I have come to the conclusion that anything we are likely to agree on at this stage would only take emphasis away from the main points we want to make.<BR>
<BR>
I have dropped all references to models and the varying arguments as to whether the JPA should continue or not. I do suggest that people make individual submissions to cover their concerns in this area. For IGC as a whole, I think we have to aim for something much simpler. <BR>
<BR>
My new suggested draft follows. Let me know what you think of this approach, and of course any suggested improvements in wording.<BR>
<BR>
Ian Peter<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>The Internet Governance Caucus is a global coalition of civil society and non governmental organisations and individuals actively involved the UN’s Internet Governance Forum (IGF) process. Formed during the lead up to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), our mission is to provide a forum for discussion, advocacy, action, and for representation of civil society contributions in Internet governance processes. We have several hundred members, with a wide spread of geographic representation; more about our coalition can be found at www.igcaucus.org <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org"><http://www.igcaucus.org></a> .<BR>
<BR>
We are thankful for the opportunity to comment on the JPA with ICANN, and respectfully submit as follows.<BR>
<BR>
In responding to your call for comments, we are mindful of the WSIS principles, which " recognize that Internet governance, carried out according to the Geneva principles, is an essential element for a people-centred, inclusive, development-oriented and non-discriminatory Information Society”. We also recognise the need for high levels of global co-operation from all stakeholder groups to ensure Internet stability and security. <BR>
<BR>
Irrespective of whether the JPA continues or not, we believe that certain principles outlined below need to be embedded in ICANN’s operation. We believe these should be covered by an undertaking by ICANN to perpetuate in its constitution, by laws, or some similar accountability mechanism, various principles which follow. The principles need to be embedded in such a way as to ensure they cannot easily be changed to exclude any stakeholder group. The principles which need to be permanently embedded are:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><FONT FACE="Symbol">· </FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">bottom up co-ordination<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><FONT FACE="Symbol">· </FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">balanced multi stakeholder representation, including civil society interests and Internet users<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><FONT FACE="Symbol">· </FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">ensuring the stability of the Internet<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><FONT FACE="Symbol">· </FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">transparency<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><FONT FACE="Symbol">· </FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">appropriate accountability mechanisms<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><FONT FACE="Symbol">· </FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">continuing evolution of an effective and appropriate governance model which is multilateral, multistakeholder, democratic, and transparent<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><FONT FACE="Symbol">· </FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman">decision making driven by the public interest<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>We also propose to replace "private sector management" with “multistakeholder management”, in line with the multistakeholder principle which has evolved from the World Summit on the Information Society and the Internet Governance Forum process which the US Government has supported, and which is an important facet, we believe, of effective internet governance arrangements.<BR>
<BR>
We think the establishment of firm principles to guide the evolution of a model is the appropriate way to proceed. This should explicitly recognize that ICANN is a global governance institution with regulatory authority over an industry (domain name registration) and over critical resources (IP addresses, root servers and addresses). The standards of due process, rights, and accountability that apply to ICANN must be developed with these facts in mind. <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'> <BR>
____________________________________________________________<BR>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR>
governance@lists.cpsr.org<BR>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR>
governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org<BR>
<BR>
For all list information and functions, see:<BR>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:13.5pt'>***********************************************************<BR>
William J. Drake <BR>
Senior Associate<BR>
Centre for International Governance<BR>
Graduate Institute of International and<BR>
Development Studies<BR>
Geneva, Switzerland<BR>
william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch<BR>
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html <a href="http://www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html"><http://www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html></a> <BR>
***********************************************************<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>